|
/in
Original Message From kitaman27:
These exclude newbies and themed minis
13 player:
14 mafia wins, 13 town wins, 2 third party wins
12 player:
15 mafia wins, 5 town wins, 1 third party wins
Heh wow that's kinda lopsided....although apparently not as bad as 10 player setups which have a 100% win percentage for mafia (in 1 game)
In it to change some stats.
I also watched 7 seasons of The Office. Did it become a dumb reality soap after Michael left.
|
Just because scum is too lazy to pm properly.
|
Snickers don't downplay yourself bro. Do that thing you do with the catching of liars and manipulations. I know you are a boss at that.
To town: We need a couple good posts in this thread as well. We can't play this entire game in PM land. But we will play it there as well. If you have a good chain with somebody in PM land, consider sharing it with the thread after it is "finished". The bigger the better. Even if there is nothing of value in it, just put it in the thread as a spoiler.
|
Well this game is boring.
|
|
|
I have no idea. I typed stuff that I wanted to type.
|
On February 19 2015 10:10 Snickers wrote:
Those two questions seem very different. Maybe I am just paranoid.
I think that because you are asking a lot of questions. Specifically asking me why i am trying to look townie. But you never said anything to eden about miller claim? Which is a vt claim right?
Idk you are looking more and more like mafia to me.
This looks like mafia scumhunting. Or pretending to scumhunt.
The problem I have with these 2 questions is that the first one is a fine question that puts pressure on geript:
"But you never said anything to eden about miller claim?"
Which is an ok question to ask because geript is going for snickers his balls and ignores Eden. So some inquiry about this is fine.
But the second one completely destroys that purpose and shows some fear/weakness from Snickers:
"Which is a vt claim right?"
The last question really gives geript an out of the pressure and downplays the first question and the scumhunting purpose behind it.
I might be misreading the last question, the intention behind it. But to me it looks like somebody acting dumb on purpose. There is obviously no miller in the set up, so it isn't a vt claim or anything. It is very obvious that Eden is being silly.
If Snickers would be truly scumhunting here I would have expected a stronger question as follow up. Because why does he say it is a vt claim? Is it because he knows there is no miller? It's just odd.
|
Now that I have shown you all the way of the Light. Follow it my children.
|
Awww. I sent LS a pm about how certain he was about his reads. So I could come to Kurumi his conclusion with proof.
|
On February 19 2015 22:03 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2015 20:11 Koshi wrote:On February 19 2015 10:10 Snickers wrote:
Those two questions seem very different. Maybe I am just paranoid.
I think that because you are asking a lot of questions. Specifically asking me why i am trying to look townie. But you never said anything to eden about miller claim? Which is a vt claim right?
Idk you are looking more and more like mafia to me. This looks like mafia scumhunting. Or pretending to scumhunt. The problem I have with these 2 questions is that the first one is a fine question that puts pressure on geript: "But you never said anything to eden about miller claim?" Which is an ok question to ask because geript is going for snickers his balls and ignores Eden. So some inquiry about this is fine. But the second one completely destroys that purpose and shows some fear/weakness from Snickers: "Which is a vt claim right?" The last question really gives geript an out of the pressure and downplays the first question and the scumhunting purpose behind it. I might be misreading the last question, the intention behind it. But to me it looks like somebody acting dumb on purpose. There is obviously no miller in the set up, so it isn't a vt claim or anything. It is very obvious that Eden is being silly. If Snickers would be truly scumhunting here I would have expected a stronger question as follow up. Because why does he say it is a vt claim? Is it because he knows there is no miller? It's just odd. fake. scum. Look, the miller claim is complete bullshit and so no need to talk about it. IMO last question is noob rather than scum and you should know that.DIE KOSHI. DIE. Also VE, i changed my mind about geript, i think hes townie.
IMO = my opinion but there is another opinion possible.
You should know that = it is quite obvious there is only 1 possibility and you don't seeing that possibility is wrong or mafia.
Don't contradict yourself in 1 sentence pls.
Why I don't believe that it is noob rather than mafia is explained. Try to read before you yell fake and gay like some youtube troll.
I think that because you are asking a lot of questions. Specifically asking me why i am trying to look townie. But you never said anything to eden about miller claim? Which is a vt claim right?
Read this Oats. Snickers is saying this:
"You are asking me a lot of questions about why I try to appear townie, but you never pressure Eden, even though Eden claimed miller. Which is VT right?"
Does this logic makes sense to you? It shouldn't because you agree the miller claim was complete bullshit. So why are you ok that snickers pushes away geript on the basis that he isn't pursuing a bullshit claim?
|
trying to look town and claiming town is completely different.
|
Why do you assume snickers is new btw? This guy his first game was boss. He caught all 3 mafia D1 and then proceeded to get bullied into oblivion by the bad townies. I am pretty sure he wasn't new to mafia when he played that first game as well.
Such a strange assumption.
I think quite highly of snickers.
|
On February 19 2015 23:10 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2015 23:06 Koshi wrote:
Why do you assume snickers is new btw? This guy his first game was boss. He caught all 3 mafia D1 and then proceeded to get bullied into oblivion by the bad townies. I am pretty sure he wasn't new to mafia when he played that first game as well.
Such a strange assumption.
I think quite highly of snickers. link game
Page 2 for your convinience. Both votes are on mafia.
|
I reread that page from snickers and I think that few here have had a better page in their lives.
Just look at that. It was amazing to see. He was on Release his ass (who everybody had as town) and then mderg made a pretty decent wall of text (which got mderg townreads from everybody) and just destroyed mderg.
The buddying is real.
|
On June 19 2014 04:51 Snickers wrote:
You are an idiot or scum if you can't "see" the scum in mderg's first post. First off saying there is a chance you are only going to contribute one post to day one. This shows his terrible interest in this game. Then he tries to say he votes to prevent mod kill. Id rather him be modkilled than him help lynch someone because he felt a slight scum. You guys must have played so many games of mafia you cannot think logically. You have these rules that you hold so highly. Even if these rules were true you guys cannot even use them right. So assuming they are true they still are no use. And somebody mentioned something about release. If you can't see the scum in his post there is a problem or you are scum.
I cannot believe no one mentioned this aspect of this game. 27nb had the same principles in her posts from the start. Confused, emotional, silly. So has ykz. Cocky , deceiving, focused. We know 27nb was town. If ykz is mafia he is very good at it. Even after the proof that he was wrong or was lying. He perfectly continues his principals after the lynch. Release on the other hand had been inconsistent with his principals. He seems aggressive than passive.
Reactionary than static. I think it should be looked into. I won't be able to post or read until six hours from now. I will look at be (whoever name keeps getting mentioned).
Also koshi seems to be obsessed with me. I am thinking him as third mafia.
Just look at this. JUST LOOK AT IT.
Fuck me. I want to see that guy play like this in this game so I can just awe him and sheep him.
|
Oats were are you? Read that post in which I coloured the 3 scum in that game in. (scum still won btw, addind that to brag and to point out that Snickers was not having an easy game)
Now compare that post with this:
I think that because you are asking a lot of questions. Specifically asking me why i am trying to look townie. But you never said anything to eden about miller claim? Which is a vt claim right?
Because call me crazy but I think he is somehow calling geript scum in here. Or suspicious? Or something?
|
On February 20 2015 00:13 liancourt wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2015 23:34 Koshi wrote:On June 19 2014 04:51 Snickers wrote:
You are an idiot or scum if you can't "see" the scum in mderg's first post. First off saying there is a chance you are only going to contribute one post to day one. This shows his terrible interest in this game. Then he tries to say he votes to prevent mod kill. Id rather him be modkilled than him help lynch someone because he felt a slight scum. You guys must have played so many games of mafia you cannot think logically. You have these rules that you hold so highly. Even if these rules were true you guys cannot even use them right. So assuming they are true they still are no use. And somebody mentioned something about release. If you can't see the scum in his post there is a problem or you are scum.
I cannot believe no one mentioned this aspect of this game. 27nb had the same principles in her posts from the start. Confused, emotional, silly. So has ykz. Cocky , deceiving, focused. We know 27nb was town. If ykz is mafia he is very good at it. Even after the proof that he was wrong or was lying. He perfectly continues his principals after the lynch. Release on the other hand had been inconsistent with his principals. He seems aggressive than passive.
Reactionary than static. I think it should be looked into. I won't be able to post or read until six hours from now. I will look at be (whoever name keeps getting mentioned).
Also koshi seems to be obsessed with me. I am thinking him as third mafia. Just look at this. JUST LOOK AT IT. Fuck me. I want to see that guy play like this in this game so I can just awe him and sheep him. so is he playing like this this game? what about his 2nd and 3rd game the games he supposedly threw.
No + I don't know about those.
My point is that Oats is assuming things that don't make sense and on top of that I can proof the contrary.
|
I knew rayn was going to say that 
|
The only thing we are doing is not being an impatient bitch.
|
Go read VE his post again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
