|
I will /in correctly when I get home.
|
|
|
pre-game excuses: I do not have access to TL while at work, so if I'm working I will only be able to play 2-3 hours in the evening max. Thankfully this coincides with the deadline so at least I'm able to be around when it counts. My schedule (this week) is Friday to Tuesday.
|
On November 19 2014 03:48 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2014 03:27 raynpelikoneet wrote:On November 19 2014 02:39 Hopeless1der wrote:
pre-game excuses: I do not have access to TL while at work, so if I'm working I will only be able to play 2-3 hours in the evening max. Thankfully this coincides with the deadline so at least I'm able to be around when it counts. My schedule (this week) is Friday to Tuesday.
I have the opposite problem because of 7am deadline.  Get up at 6:55 and ninja vote lol
more like 6:45, have to draw a couple options up just in case.
|
|
|
is that an iceberg or a water monster?
|
On November 20 2014 13:59 Fecalfeast wrote:
It's a boat
i was referring to chezinus post on last page.
and now we have a very special snowflake to decipher...
|
VE colored me green, I see no reason to comment further.
|
On November 20 2014 15:06 VisceraEyes wrote:
And yo, Chez is the one with the case on you Hopeless. Gotta respond to him. I just agree with him.
lol wut. there is no case, there's me seeing a ridiculous picture and wondering "what the fuck?"
|
On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
Well there's a vote for you and a link to your filter. That's case enough for me, for reasons I provided. If you WANT to, I GUESS you could answer MY points.
What value is there in "deciphering" chez's snowflake or figuring out what the blue thing is on Chez' first picture? Is that going to help you get a read on Chez?
I think it's more likely that you just wanted to appear contributory. You even throw in a "we" there talking about the special snowflake, implying that you're a part of town.
I think you are overjustifying way too hard.
|
On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
Well there's a vote for you and a link to your filter. That's case enough for me, for reasons I provided. If you WANT to, I GUESS you could answer MY points.
What value is there in "deciphering" chez's snowflake or figuring out what the blue thing is on Chez' first picture? I wanted to know what the painting was in the first one, and then wondered wtf the snowflake was about. On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:Is that going to help you get a read on Chez? Not really.
On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
I think it's more likely that you just wanted to appear contributory. You even throw in a "we" there talking about the special snowflake, implying that you're a part of town. "Implying?" What the fuck is this VE, you have no grounds to call me scum and yet already you're turning confirmation bias bullshit.
|
On November 20 2014 15:49 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:44 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:36 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:26 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:24 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:22 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:18 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:17 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 14:51 VisceraEyes wrote:
So my first instinct when I want to appear active as mafia is to just get in the thread and comment on something - ANYTHING. Like, it doesn't even have to be important, it just has to be a random comment about something happening in the thread.
On November 20 2014 14:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
Does anyone want reasoning? I'm like itching to give some, but I want someone to either ask or guess what it is. ![[image loading]](http://www.alanzosblog.com/wp-content/uploads/skeptical-baby.jpg) Cute. Do you think I'm mafia? If yes, then where's your vote? If no, then what's the problem? well according to yourself you're playing your mafia meta, and i should trust you as you are a reliable source when it comes to yourself. You didn't answer the question. Are you mafia ritoky? you're the most mafia person in the thread, mainly cuz you're a hypocrite. and nope. I'm not a hypocrite. There's a very STARK difference between what I'm accusing Hopeless of, making contentless posts to appear contributory, and what I'm doing, which is making a read on someone based on my observation of their play. There's literally nothing mafia about what I've done in the thread so far, you're either butthurt about the last game or you're mafia. I'll accept either one, but I'm voting for Hopeless because he claimed mafia first. claims town -> hey guys this is my mafia meta -> does exactly what he says his mafia meta is. you can believe your read all you want, but seems more like you just waiting to take a shot at one of the early posters trying to get a cheap "gotcha" moment. whether that's from a town mindset or a mafia mindset at this point i am unsure, but i think as of now it leans more scummy to me. certainly more than anything anyone else has posted. you shouldn't bring up last game cuz then i will have to dig up your reads and we will see how little we should believe this read of yours. This is LITERALLY what you just did to me. I didn't "gotcha" anything about Hopeless, he did some things, and I explained why I thought they made him mafia. I didn't "catch" him doing anything. You're the one who is saying I'm mafia for doing this, and YOU are doing this. What does that make you ritoky? and i think your description of how you formulated a read on hopeless is the exact same process as to how i formed a read on you. doesn't really matter now though, i am less skeptical of you just making crap up after hopeless overreacted.
Why do you say I overreacted?
|
In what way does my response CHANGE what VE did?
"Contentless throwaway"
3 posts within the first hour of the game...yeah okay. Totes scumread.
|
On November 20 2014 15:52 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:50 Hopeless1der wrote:On November 20 2014 15:49 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:44 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:36 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:26 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:24 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:22 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:18 VisceraEyes wrote:
[quote]
Cute. Do you think I'm mafia? If yes, then where's your vote? If no, then what's the problem? well according to yourself you're playing your mafia meta, and i should trust you as you are a reliable source when it comes to yourself. You didn't answer the question. Are you mafia ritoky? you're the most mafia person in the thread, mainly cuz you're a hypocrite. and nope. I'm not a hypocrite. There's a very STARK difference between what I'm accusing Hopeless of, making contentless posts to appear contributory, and what I'm doing, which is making a read on someone based on my observation of their play. There's literally nothing mafia about what I've done in the thread so far, you're either butthurt about the last game or you're mafia. I'll accept either one, but I'm voting for Hopeless because he claimed mafia first. claims town -> hey guys this is my mafia meta -> does exactly what he says his mafia meta is. you can believe your read all you want, but seems more like you just waiting to take a shot at one of the early posters trying to get a cheap "gotcha" moment. whether that's from a town mindset or a mafia mindset at this point i am unsure, but i think as of now it leans more scummy to me. certainly more than anything anyone else has posted. you shouldn't bring up last game cuz then i will have to dig up your reads and we will see how little we should believe this read of yours. This is LITERALLY what you just did to me. I didn't "gotcha" anything about Hopeless, he did some things, and I explained why I thought they made him mafia. I didn't "catch" him doing anything. You're the one who is saying I'm mafia for doing this, and YOU are doing this. What does that make you ritoky? and i think your description of how you formulated a read on hopeless is the exact same process as to how i formed a read on you. doesn't really matter now though, i am less skeptical of you just making crap up after hopeless overreacted. Why do you say I overreacted? Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:33 Hopeless1der wrote:On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
Well there's a vote for you and a link to your filter. That's case enough for me, for reasons I provided. If you WANT to, I GUESS you could answer MY points.
What value is there in "deciphering" chez's snowflake or figuring out what the blue thing is on Chez' first picture? I wanted to know what the painting was in the first one, and then wondered wtf the snowflake was about. On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:Is that going to help you get a read on Chez? Not really. On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
I think it's more likely that you just wanted to appear contributory. You even throw in a "we" there talking about the special snowflake, implying that you're a part of town. "Implying?" What the fuck is this VE, you have no grounds to call me scum and yet already you're turning confirmation bias bullshit. bolded part is a massive overreaction to someone calling you scum for a shaky reason at best 1 hour in. to me overreactions imply a person has something to hide.
He took an already shaky premise and twisted the word "we" into a scumread. That is fucking ludicrous and I will not stand for it.
|
On November 20 2014 15:56 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 15:53 Hopeless1der wrote:On November 20 2014 15:52 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:50 Hopeless1der wrote:On November 20 2014 15:49 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:44 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:36 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 15:26 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 15:24 VisceraEyes wrote:
[quote]
You didn't answer the question.
Are you mafia ritoky? you're the most mafia person in the thread, mainly cuz you're a hypocrite. and nope. I'm not a hypocrite. There's a very STARK difference between what I'm accusing Hopeless of, making contentless posts to appear contributory, and what I'm doing, which is making a read on someone based on my observation of their play. There's literally nothing mafia about what I've done in the thread so far, you're either butthurt about the last game or you're mafia. I'll accept either one, but I'm voting for Hopeless because he claimed mafia first. claims town -> hey guys this is my mafia meta -> does exactly what he says his mafia meta is. you can believe your read all you want, but seems more like you just waiting to take a shot at one of the early posters trying to get a cheap "gotcha" moment. whether that's from a town mindset or a mafia mindset at this point i am unsure, but i think as of now it leans more scummy to me. certainly more than anything anyone else has posted. you shouldn't bring up last game cuz then i will have to dig up your reads and we will see how little we should believe this read of yours. This is LITERALLY what you just did to me. I didn't "gotcha" anything about Hopeless, he did some things, and I explained why I thought they made him mafia. I didn't "catch" him doing anything. You're the one who is saying I'm mafia for doing this, and YOU are doing this. What does that make you ritoky? and i think your description of how you formulated a read on hopeless is the exact same process as to how i formed a read on you. doesn't really matter now though, i am less skeptical of you just making crap up after hopeless overreacted. Why do you say I overreacted? On November 20 2014 15:33 Hopeless1der wrote:On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
Well there's a vote for you and a link to your filter. That's case enough for me, for reasons I provided. If you WANT to, I GUESS you could answer MY points.
What value is there in "deciphering" chez's snowflake or figuring out what the blue thing is on Chez' first picture? I wanted to know what the painting was in the first one, and then wondered wtf the snowflake was about. On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:Is that going to help you get a read on Chez? Not really. On November 20 2014 15:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
I think it's more likely that you just wanted to appear contributory. You even throw in a "we" there talking about the special snowflake, implying that you're a part of town. "Implying?" What the fuck is this VE, you have no grounds to call me scum and yet already you're turning confirmation bias bullshit. bolded part is a massive overreaction to someone calling you scum for a shaky reason at best 1 hour in. to me overreactions imply a person has something to hide. He took an already shaky premise and twisted the word "we" into a scumread. That is fucking ludicrous and I will not stand for it. then advance the game in a more positive direction rather than just sitting there whining about it and being defensive?
that falls in the OMGUS VE category.
|
I could conceive of you being mafia VE. self-meta holds little to no weight with me.
|
|
|
Rayn, would you use words like "consistent" and "reasonable" to describe VE this game?
Sicklucker, do you have any comment on VE's CONTENT, as opposed to his filter length?
|
liancourt when are you going to stop playing "douchebag meta". Or should be just lynch you like you want us to?
|
what is it that you'd like to see HF?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/T9azdtC.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Gazbsv0.jpg)
