Lynch all liars? In that case you are either telling the truth with your mafia claim and we should lynch you

Or you are lying, and we should lynch you because of your own policy

well done you.

Can we lynch Holyflare first at least?

Artanis[Xp]

Netherlands12971 Posts

February 03 2014 23:21 GMT

#76

On February 04 2014 08:20 Holyflare wrote:
do you not want to lynch scum wave?

Nah he doesn't, he's my buddy.

Artanis[Xp]

Netherlands12971 Posts

February 03 2014 23:27 GMT

#87

On February 04 2014 08:26 iamperfection wrote:
Hrm wave are you being serious?

Was wondering the same thing. Accuses marv of taking a joke too seriously right before taking a joke too seriously himself.

Artanis[Xp]

Netherlands12971 Posts

February 03 2014 23:36 GMT

#95

On February 04 2014 08:33 iamperfection wrote:
Wait lynched people don't flip that seems backwards

Yeah. My idea was that we should lynch the person we think is the second likeliest to be scum and tell him to shoot the person we think is likeliest to be scum. If he doesn't agree then he's claiming scum.
Problem with this is that part of the fun in this game is to shoot who you want to shoot and I'm not prepared to sacrifice that so I'm kinda against my own plan. Bit of an objectively best plan vs most fun kinda deal.

Artanis[Xp]

Netherlands12971 Posts

February 03 2014 23:38 GMT

#97

On February 04 2014 08:36 Holyflare wrote:

Show nested quote +

it's not, however, there are a few simple solutions to this that we can do!

1. Whoever we lynch we tell them who to shoot. That way if the person follows with our consensus then they are most likely town. If they don't then you can most likely attribute the shot to scum. This option allows a scum to hide by shooting a towny though.

2.We lynch our 2nd top scum suspect and then get him to shoot our first top scum suspect thus revealing a flip on our intended target.

I'm sure there are other ways just those are the 2 we have tended to use on voice

What's the difference between 1 and 2?

Artanis[Xp]

Netherlands12971 Posts

February 03 2014 23:43 GMT

#100

But aren't they both just the same option with the only difference being that in option 2 we're going with our second strongest scumspect instead of our strongest? It's the same strategy, just a different lynch target.

Artanis[Xp]

Netherlands12971 Posts

February 03 2014 23:47 GMT

#102

The point is you didn't need to describe the same tactic behind it twice. Anyway, this discussion is irrelevant. The question is if the players will listen to the person you want to lynch. I can guarantee I'm going to vigilante it because it's part of the enjoyment and why I signed up.

Artanis[Xp]

Netherlands12971 Posts

February 03 2014 23:52 GMT

#105

On February 04 2014 08:50 Holyflare wrote:
I signed up to win thanks.

I signed up to win while having fun. I'm not planning on sacrificing either of those.

Artanis[Xp]

Netherlands12971 Posts

February 04 2014 14:37 GMT

#493

I don't understand why so much discussion has arisen on my mafia claim. It was clearly in jest. It's sort of an inside joke though; Rayn always counterclaims what I claim on voice, so I claim mafia in thread with the attempt of making him counterclaim it for funsies as well as being a conversation starter. The intent wasn't to have 15 pages littered with people calling it non alignment indicative though, so sorry 'bout that.

I like HF's comments regarding Wave. Rayn mentioned that you can't really meta him because his last scum game was 9 months ago, but if a game is different enough from his usual towngame then that's a point that points towards scumminess. Him finding HF and myself scummy despite agreeing with HF's initial remark is, to put it in scummarv words, smelly.

Speaking of Marv, I'm curious why you find Rayn scummy for what he's poking at. The Rayn I know likes to poke at everything and tends to just post a lot. I like the point regarding his inconsistency between thinking there are clearly reads to be made yet not supplying any, though.

On February 04 2014 23:22 Cephiro wrote:
Back home and briefly read through the thread. I still have some things to take care of, so I will post my thoughts later on in the evening. I like the content available so far, although some back and forth's were taken too far and lost their usefulness in my opinion.

Automatic + for everyone that isn't rushing to get a lynch done too quickly.

What is the purpose of this post? What content do you like? Why did you feel the need to post a comment without any content?
I don't understand.

Artanis[Xp]

Netherlands12971 Posts

February 04 2014 14:44 GMT

#496

On February 04 2014 23:39 marvellosity wrote:
How can you be curious when I literally made a case explaining why?

You said you consider him to be scummy for pointing out things for the sake of it. My experience is that Rayn points out just about anything he finds remotely interesting. So why does it make him scum?

Artanis[Xp]

Netherlands12971 Posts

February 04 2014 14:53 GMT

#503

On February 04 2014 23:45 marvellosity wrote:

Show nested quote +

Because his read on Holy wasn't even remotely interesting, it was simply pointless. As explained.

I'm talking mostly about your second and third points here. As for the first, I could see it as a post basically telling HF to not purposefully enrage DP and his thoughts wandered from there. Posts being pointless does not equal scum, you should be well aware of that.

Artanis[Xp]

Netherlands12971 Posts

February 04 2014 14:57 GMT

#508

On February 04 2014 23:55 marvellosity wrote:

Show nested quote +

Which points?

Be clear, boy.

Second and third means the second and third posts you quoted and commented on.

Artanis[Xp]

Netherlands12971 Posts

February 04 2014 15:10 GMT

#516

On February 04 2014 23:58 marvellosity wrote:
Artanis, be very specific what the issue is with my post, because at the moment I'm not seeing it and it looks like you're just saying things. Quote stuff and explain what is wrong with it.

You might be right because I'm getting confused with specific wording. My point was simply that I considered point 2 and 3 non alignment indicative. That's all there is to it.

I reread regarding point 1 and Rayn's answer and find his answer lacking. It's a bad open and together with the inconsistency I would consider him smelly.

Artanis[Xp]

Netherlands12971 Posts

February 04 2014 15:15 GMT

#520

On February 05 2014 00:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Show nested quote +

How is my answer lacking? I don't even know what you are talking about.

Clarifying your position when you hadn't even entered the thread yet feels unnecessary. And if you felt there wasn't much alignment indicative things in the thread yet, why did you have a problem with Promethelax' post?

Artanis[Xp]

Netherlands12971 Posts

February 05 2014 09:37 GMT

#818

Hey guys, sorry about being AFK for a while. Was at a gig yesterday night. I haven't exactly had the best entry in the game, and I doubt I can cast suspicions aside for some time as I'll be gone for most of today. I wouldn't mind getting lynched as at least it'll give me a chance of redemption; I can shoot scum and make up for the entire game in one shot. I'll have time to truly read tomorrow. Give me my chance then and I'll make amends.

Artanis[Xp]

Netherlands12971 Posts

February 06 2014 00:02 GMT

#1047

I was driving back today feeling motivated to post, then I found out I flamingo'd up on the game I hosted and it severely cut into said motivation. Instead of reading everything I've missed, I'm just going to try to make the game enjoyable for everyone in the meantime by posting pictures of cute animals. Everyone likes cute animals.