I am caught up, i am not posting if i am not caught up.

Hey Blazinghand. Why exactly are you voting for Oats? I have read like 20 different reasoning for your vote and every time it's different. Like at least three time you say "it's not RNG", then "and also RNG", then "not RNG". I have a hard time figuring out why do you exactly think Oats is scum.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43270 Posts

October 02 2013 17:52 GMT

#319

I dunno yet. I am not going to vote for marv or clarity, that's for sure.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43270 Posts

October 02 2013 17:55 GMT

#321

On October 03 2013 02:53 Clarity_nl wrote:

Show nested quote +

Actually it goes:

1) Let's vote whoever gets rng'd by my post number!
2) it's oats, let's lynch him, my idea is good because X
3) oh look his reaction to my random lynch on him makes him look scummy to me, so we should lynch him

It's really not that hard to follow.

Yeah but he also gives policy reasons and all kinds of shit besides that, and brings up the RNG reasoning too later on.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43270 Posts

October 02 2013 17:57 GMT

#322

On October 02 2013 15:09 Blazinghand wrote:
Yeah basically I'm mad at him so we should lynch him. Then he won't make me mad in future games cause I can basically lynch players on a whim due to my great influence. This is actually an okay reason imo because it will make him play good and not like oats.

Also RNG.

Like, for example, this is probably the worst post in this game.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43270 Posts

October 02 2013 18:02 GMT

#325

I dunno, maybe it's just BH making him mad. He's kinda... over-analyzing stuff in non-Oats' manner.
I'll look into Dirkzor, gimme a sec.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43270 Posts

October 02 2013 18:11 GMT

#326

I am trying to find out myself if i believe his "feel reads" are legit or if he is scum.
Dirkzor if you base your early day 1 reads on feels, why did you say somthing completely different in your post where you voted for HF? If it's a gut read why frame it to something else?

raynpelikoneet

Finland43270 Posts

October 02 2013 18:35 GMT

#329

On October 03 2013 03:31 Clarity_nl wrote:

Show nested quote +

No seriously. Details would be nice.

What is analyzing stuff in an "oats manner" and how is it different from this game?
Quote the post where he is over analyzing.

It's nothing specific in any specific post. He is using a lot of words, that's something he usually does not do. His posts are usually short and i would have expected him to not fight with BH as he did. I would have expected him to say "whatever man, you're scum or retarded for doing this shit" or something.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43270 Posts

October 02 2013 18:49 GMT

#335

So what do people think about Risen's post. I'm kinda sure he is town.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43270 Posts

October 02 2013 19:05 GMT

#337

I didn't reword anything, I asked BH a question because (as rayn pointed out just now) BH was being unclear as to why his vote was on oats. It was rng then it was reasons then it was rng again.

Wait what Clarity. why did you clarify BH's actions to me if you are not sure what he was doing?