|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
/in 
On September 28 2013 09:46 iamperfection wrote:
Replacements
Replacements will be done until the start of night 3. If you need to replace pm me immediately and do not make any reference to replacing in the thread and stop posting. I really don't want to use replacements in my game ever please do not sign up if you don't have the patience or time to play
For a 9 player game (or any imo, but especially a 9 player) potentially replacing someone after the day 3 lynch isn't really acceptable, it's too late. I'd ask you to reconsider this timeframe
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I don't know how to meta any of you really
Curses
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
there's no hype.
there is only anti-hype for tardy starting.
ANTI-HYPE.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
l2read
On October 01 2013 05:50 marvellosity wrote:
there's no hype.
there is only anti-hype for tardy starting.
ANTI-HYPE.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 02 2013 00:53 Risen wrote:
I can't wait for this game to start so I can actually try and have fun in a mafia game. Look at that player list.
Edit: But uhh... totally not hype. No hype at all.
Good boy <3
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I'm gonna lynch all of you.
ANTI-HYPE
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Hmm. your newbie game suggests you're going to be unbearable. Policy lynch? :D
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 02 2013 05:46 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2013 05:25 marvellosity wrote:
Hmm. your newbie game suggests you're going to be unbearable. Policy lynch? :D Those words have no meaning on TL, marv, you know that.
I relied on that, I don't want to be mean after all.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
It bugs me intensely that iamp capitalises his name differently in flavour than he does in his own name.
Also, rejoice! etc.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Not doing anything funny at all. No random lynches or policy lynches, even on Holyflare. Straight up.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 02 2013 15:23 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2013 15:20 Blazinghand wrote:On October 02 2013 15:14 Clarity_nl wrote:On October 02 2013 15:10 Blazinghand wrote:
Seriously though if the reason I've given for lynching him are normal oats behavior then that's like a policy lynch reason right there. We should do it, it would be awesome. I know you like your game theory, and technically we have a 2/7 chance (since doc will claim), but the information we get off of people agreeing to a random lynch isn't that telling I don't think. Rather just spark discussion as usual and see what happens. Despite,(according to database numbers) a random lynch being slightly more effective, if it hits town it probably gets less information than if there are a couple of lynch candidates and they are discussed and votes are moved around. That's a reasonable thing to say. That being said, the RNG led (and in general it seems, leads) to a good discussion. I don't think things would have played out as they did unless I RNGed this game, and I'm glad I did. That's fine and I think we have some information that came out of it rather than lurker lynch policy talk which is a dead horse. But do you plan on hanging on to your rng lynch today unless someone becomes obvious scum? Or do you feel that oats is no longer a random lynch now and you think he's most likely to flip scum at this time, and if that changes you'll change your vote?
What info in particular do you think was gained?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 02 2013 18:37 Holyflare wrote:
slOosh at least started asking questions when he initially joined into the discussion although has not really contributed since then at least he read up to date or so it seems. He's not too into meta but is alright saying that oats' play is just like his meta view of him though which was a little odd. Need to hear more on that side of things.
I like this observation :>
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
##Vote: Dirkzor
Not even read his post voting Holyflare, but I don't really think he should be voting HF right now as his entrance into the thread.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Ok now I read it. He provides two quotes as contextual evidence for his non-read on Oats, and none with his scumread on Holyflare. Seems like my vote is quite good.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I explained why I voted.
Your question is silly.
"yes, I was terrified someone might vote him before me, that's absolutely why I voted him like that"
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
HF has tried harder than most other people in the game and at the very least has been active and the centre of attention. He felt quite town reading through to me.
A vote on him feels pretty opportunistic coming in to the thread when you did.
Especially with the line "and he hasn't really done anything" - that's a bit rich.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
That's totally different reasoning to the reasoning you used last page.
At least you've taken to providing contextual evidence to your scumread instead of your null read now. Yay!
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Don't really have any. Annoying.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 02 2013 19:15 Dirkzor wrote:
Not different reasoning. He hasn't done anything. I said the in the first post and I stand by that. Add that to supporting rng "because BH said so" and him walking around BH's shadow is a great reason for me to vote him. I still dont get how it can be opportunistic? Had it been oppurtinistic if I had voted someone else or is it onle because it was HF?
Why can't a townie do this?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Could you also tell me how he's been walking around in BH's shadow, apart from agreeing with the original RNG lynch proposal?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
