Aperture Mafia 2: Episode 2

On August 31 2013 02:05 VayneAuthority wrote:


uh no the problem you just clearly addressed is that people give trolls towncred. Don't try to turn this on me when it's not specifically limited to me. All trolls receive towncred for whatever reason. Zero reason not to troll as this game was just ruined for me because I actually tried to play.

So no, I'm not the problem here.

On August 31 2013 07:01 geript wrote:
Ok. Feel free to vote then.

On August 31 2013 07:34 Cephiro wrote:


One possibility could be is that his powers have to do with people voting on him. I would imagine town has many other possibilities than just lynching to get rid of someone, thus it may very well be that he's baiting votes on himself to cause us trouble.

Or then he's just being in-your-face daring. In any case, it can be dealt with by night actions if we'd rather decide to do so.

Have you thought about giving me the item?

On August 31 2013 07:46 Blazinghand wrote:
I'm not getting lynched today Hiro. Even if you don't like me and want to lynch me, I'm still in the townier half of this town and it's sub-optimal to lynch me D1 regardless

On August 31 2013 07:44 HiroPro wrote:
I think geript has no idea what he's doing (yes I'm well aware that he's played a number of games). He's seen other people do nothing, antagonize other players in the games, yet not be lynched and thinks that he can do the same. The post where he claims "unlynchable" strikes me in the same vein - it's a joke post just designed to annoy. I don't see anything about his play that suggests specifically that he's mafia other than that he hasn't attempted to scumhunt in any manner (which can honestly be said about half the thread).

Furthermore, BH's play right now is striking me as very opportunistic:
This post in particular appears very suspicious. There's no evidence to indicate that BH had any prior suspicion of geript and he doesn't even attempt to offer any sort of reason for lynching geript. Think about this carefully - what's the first reaction that a town player would likely have when they see someone claim "unlynchable". They'd either think that it's a ludicrous claim or they'd start wondering why someone would claim this (as either alignment).

Why is BH's first response to simply just throw down a vote? Why is he so quick to abandon a case on Cephiro that has some sort of reasoning to just blindly go "he said to vote him, LET'S DO IT!"

Think about what I said earlier about BH's play (if you haven't read my earlier post on him, go back and do it, think about what I'm saying, read between the lines, and don't just go "oh he's roleplaying, guess I should ignore him").

Be Strong. Be Brown. Vote BH.

On August 31 2013 07:55 HiroPro wrote:

Clarity and strong. I haven't found the others yet, but I will!

On August 31 2013 07:55 HiroPro wrote:

Clarity and strong. I haven't found the others yet, but I will!

On August 31 2013 08:04 HiroPro wrote:

Because neither of you have actually voted for geript, haven't completely abandoned your big case on someone else, and haven't struck me as suspicious before this? Come on clarity, think -_-

On August 31 2013 08:04 HiroPro wrote:
<snip>
Think about this carefully - what's the first reaction that a town player would likely have when they see someone claim "unlynchable". They'd either think that it's a ludicrous claim or they'd start wondering why someone would claim this (as either alignment).
<snip>

On August 31 2013 06:56 Clarity_nl wrote:
I think we should try to lynch the unlynchable, worst case we nolynch which might have happened anyway in such a big game.

On August 31 2013 07:01 WaveofShadow wrote:

I agree with this completely.