EPTA Bluelightz Mafia "The Attack"
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
| ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
I also will not break the rulez that Bluelightz has set forth | ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
replacement -> in I can play this one now. | ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
We must lynch this Redville scum and take revenge for the mayor!!! Down with FirmTofu!!!! Up with SilkenTofu!!! Constructively discussing? Are we dreaming about a different type of forum mafia. If we wanted constructive discussion, might as well lop off about 24 hours of time and get closer to the voting deadline. Beginning of games is always fluffy and I like fluffy. | ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
Firstly, I'm looking at lynching rules. Is it majority or plurality. I'm going to assume majority by default. Secondly, do we have a countdown clock for the action deadlines? Would be much appreciated. FirmTofu just giving out those scum points. Anyways, we should be happy about these hydras. Two separate people trying to fake town have a much harder time of keeping their Redville lies straight, it's much harder to pull off those scummy conspiracies, and scum slips are twice as likely. Be glad of hydras. | ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
Let's go look over the who might look like a surer lynch among the actives. If no clear candidate, let's go with an inactive. | ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
 Fuck! This is going to be bad for town. At this point I'm looking at the most active filter: getmoript. All this stuff looks townie for me right now. | ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
Getript suggests that we should be lynching him. A bit later, he shows up for a short little post about Tofu and then promptly goes to sleep. As getript suggests "convenient." Also 5T, what are you doing leaving me off your lists!!! You too Tofu!!! I am useless. Totally useless. | ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
On July 22 2013 09:49 austinmcc wrote: Explain the first sentence please. The pressure/suspicion vote bit. HOPEFULLY JJD shows up for discussion after sleeping. | ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
From my point of view, as vanilla town, it's just stupid and I called out both 5T and Tofu for it. | ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
On July 22 2013 10:50 austinmcc wrote: Wut? It's interesting that he made a lurker list, and, assuming marv has been doing the posting, has basically ONLY made the lurker list and contributed little else, yet left you off of it. 48 hours to make a lurker list in a mini and he leaves a dude off. Just interesting for now. You say it's stupid. Anything else? Do you think it's alignment-indicative at all? Looking at the post timing, it wasn't that bad of any omission at the time. I don't see it as alignment indicative. | ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
On July 21 2013 07:48 TheAwesomeAll wrote: Hey guys look at my townie townieness im talking about being a good townie so i must be a good townie right? It's a first post so it could be telling or it could just be fluff. The other posts do throw some shit around but bring me back to my sentiment about this game. We're doomed with how many inactives there are currently. So as town, we do have to throw some shit around and watch for what the reactions are from the active players. Then we can come up with a plan or something like that and pose a challenge for scum. | ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
On July 22 2013 11:33 getmoript wrote: @TG. You think I'm town right? I think so. Yes. On July 22 2013 11:35 austinmcc wrote: As best as I can tell, TAA was calling FirmTofu kind of scummy or useless in that post. You disagree with the assessment and think TAA is just making a fluff post? I believe that TAA was actually calling Tofu scummy. I say that it is his most scummy post. It's not fluff in that it's completely meaningless, but rather Day 1 type interaction. As a first post, it could either be extremely revealing (a slip) or just sort of a getting into the game type entry. I favor the latter interpretation. | ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
| ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
Coming into the post, JarJar jumped on Tofu who was the most obvious target and then leaves. This is most likely not indicative of scum as townies seem more likely to do it. But it does provide a quick way to try to pick up on some scum tells. | ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
On July 22 2013 12:15 getmoript wrote: This is an awful post. Town wants nothing more than to be active and completely transparent with their reads at all time. Why are you trying to get us to think about what scum want to do with your post before you even post it? -Wave I'm in the middle of doing a read into a couple people as Geript and I have been talking in the QT. I post it because it's not going to be used anymore. It's only applicable to meta in the future. The other hydra head already has said that JJD is town by meta. | ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
I'm multitasking. Doing two things at the same time. When votes are counted, lynching an active based on evidence is preferable to lynching an inactive. I'm poking the inactives while I still have time. | ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
On July 20 2013 14:23 Bluelightz wrote: This is where you vote. This game uses Majority Voting, please use the format outlined in the main thread. | ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
On July 22 2013 12:45 austinmcc wrote: Waiting on friggin' getmoript to post. Actually interested in their thoughts on TanGeng. I found that first post of his scummy, where he voted JJD. I found his absolutely refusal to give reason for it, while commenting on a couple of other things and just repeatedly ducking something like giving reasons for his vote or explaining a comment he made to be mind-boggling. I don't understand it as EITHER faction. He didn't say no, he just consciously avoided specific things and yet answered other questions and poked at me once or twice. I can't understand townies not giving reasoning for their votes/reads, especially when I've seen him do it. I can't understand mafia just straight up going "Nope nope nope, better not acknowledge that someone wants my read here, better just drop my head in the sand." Because it's not a read, yet, and if I'm probing, I am not going to telegraph how I will be probing. It isn't effective. I was clear that it was a pressure vote and I stand by that. Still not seeing where I am dropping head in the sand. | ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
On July 22 2013 13:05 austinmcc wrote: There's what I'm talking about. Big bolded bits are me asking you what discussion you wanted, why you were voting, whether it bothered you that getmoript, the hydra you read and whose suspicions you were voting off of, had unvoted, etc. etc. etc. You talked about TAA. You talked about why TAA was also somewhat scummy. You talked about being left off of lists. About inactives. But dear sweet jesus you REFUSED to discuss your actual vote, what you wanted JJD to discuss, etc. etc. I see I ignored you for the longest time and that was because I was read the thread and giving thought on other things, rather than wanting to reveal what questions I wanted to spring on JJD when he is back that he would want to answer because I had my vote on him. Also I don't think TAA is scum. What he did in his first series of posts can be considered scummy. | ||
| ||
