EPTIf not...happy to sit and replace either a player or a nuke that goes missing.
[T] Nuclear Winter Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
If not...happy to sit and replace either a player or a nuke that goes missing. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 07 2013 07:05 geript wrote: Dandel, why do you nuke me with the first post instead of even trying to divine my alignment? Why take an easy potshot like that? Why even pretend to nuke when we don't even know if nukes have to be posted in the thread? On July 07 2013 07:07 geript wrote: Yo Dandel. I already asked you why fake nuke? Don't fucking do that shit. It's quite possible other teams 3P/Scum don't have to post their nukes in the thread and then that just fucks shit up of the rest of us. STOP 'splain please | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 07 2013 07:23 geript wrote: In Hydra 2 nukes could be pm'd to the host to be sent without having been posted in the thread. Had scum noticed they would've nuked Fivetouch when Palmar/DP fake nuked them. I didn't see anything requiring nukes be posted in the thread in the OP so there's no reason to fake nuke as it can really fuck up town if a hidden nuke is launched off of a fake nuke. maaaaaan. That's a way better explanation than "I wanted to sound like I was saying something protown but got a little tripped up and just spoke nonsense." Also, still kinda nonsense, cuz lol who would ever nuke fivetouch. His reads are worse than my herpes flareups. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 07 2013 09:29 raynpelikoneet wrote: vayne try to make some sense if you are town. This is the fucking worst nuke of the century. On July 07 2013 09:26 VayneAuthority wrote: This was actually an original thought posted in thread on that page.It's probably a bad idea to do the fake nukes as it narrows down for scum who actually has a nuke when your fake nuke doesn't work. However, his other post was nonsensical, that's true. At least that's my opinion, which is probably wrong. Also, as a note, now that we've seen a nuke. If you think you know all sorts of stuff about the nukes in this game, you're probably horribly, horribly wrong. Game themed around nukes. OP mentions different types of nukes, multi-nukers, and we could easily see dud nukes/nuke retargeters/silent nukes/whatever. You can't freak out because chez shot a nuke, that's...sort of what this game is about. Nor do you know if it will land, or where, or anything. So knock it off with the caps and the freaking out. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 07 2013 09:31 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: ^ Nobody listen to this. This is what loses town high kp games. People need to sit back and chill the fuck out. Xat is most likely dead, now lets not do anything rash. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 07 2013 09:52 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Right now I pretty much just hate this thread. I'm reading it, but not fully processing it, because a lot of it has nothing to do with anything and I wish people would quit posting so much. The post-chez stuff is shitting up the thread but doing so in a very obvious and very...wrong way. If he's scum and just trying to get chez nuked, that seems silly AND is going to put a target on his head if chez were town (OMG CHEZ NUKED TOWN, NUKE CHEZ, OMG CHEZ WAS TOWN....NUKE ME?). Congratulations, you may be the dumbest person currently playing this game. You're also easily the scummiest. You start off super defensive, then proceed to shit up the thread with a dumb argument and then go after chez who is a pretty easy (but incredibly bad) target since he launched a nuke. Then you omgus. I'd be down a for a rayn lynch. Dandel, wos, austin, geript lets get some input here. Therefore, I don't want to lynch him right now. But I also don't want to read filter at this point because he's been involved in all this early silliness. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 07 2013 09:56 raynpelikoneet wrote: You'll notice that at no point in the OP does it say ANYONE has silent nukes. You'll notice that it doesn't say "scum has silent nukes and town doesn't." Xata, because if he did not announce it in thread it was "sure" to be scum nuke and someone would anti-nuke it if possible. If he does announce it, everyone goes: "why the fuck would he nuke if he was scum??. THAT*S WHY"! You are assuming both of those things to be true and then using those assumptions to justify something. You may be assuming that because one/both of those things were true in another game, but this game is not that game. Stop. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 07 2013 09:56 austinmcc wrote: Does this make sense, MZ? If he were scum, he's either trying to sac chez for credit or he's trying to get someone to nuke town chez for nuking town xat. (Or both are scum and then rayn wouldn't be doing this probs, because he'd look bad/odd when xat flipped)The post-chez stuff is shitting up the thread but doing so in a very obvious and very...wrong way. If he's scum and just trying to get chez nuked, that seems silly AND is going to put a target on his head if chez were town (OMG CHEZ NUKED TOWN, NUKE CHEZ, OMG CHEZ WAS TOWN....NUKE ME?). Therefore, I don't want to lynch him right now. What, specifically, are you seeing in terms of him going from defensive --> shitting, and why does it give you a scumread? | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 08 2013 04:34 Onegu wrote: I'ma interested in this.Just the way he admited he launched it but didnt explain why gives me a really big scum vibe Had he explained himself (also, he more or less did - + Show Spoiler + On July 07 2013 09:20 Chezinu wrote: Chezinu Rulez! So don't break Chezinu's Rule. ##Nuke: Xatalos xat fakenuked chez, chez nuked xat back If it's not just giving an explanation, but the actual explanation given, can you give me 1-2 examples of a townie explanation for a nuke and a scummy explanation for a nuke? | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 07 2013 10:19 austinmcc wrote: Does this make sense, MZ? If he were scum, he's either trying to sac chez for credit or he's trying to get someone to nuke town chez for nuking town xat. (Or both are scum and then rayn wouldn't be doing this probs, because he'd look bad/odd when xat flipped) What, specifically, are you seeing in terms of him going from defensive --> shitting, and why does it give you a scumread? Even in your big list post, you drop "lolscum" as your only reasoning. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 08 2013 05:51 Xatalos wrote: What is my town meta? More specifically, my town meta in a large game?I'll go ahead and vote austinmcc now. ##Vote austinmcc He's been basically just asking (filler) questions and not scumhunting or showing effort so far. At least he's less lurky than in PTP, but that's not a hard feat, and it's still not even close to how I remember his townie self. Just comparing his town meta to this game (or PTP) makes it feel like he has to be scum or 3rd party etc. I didn't push this stance hard enough in PTP, but I'm not going to repeat the same mistake now - unless he starts appearing townish ASAP. geript, you still want to lynch WoS or whom? Also, do you have interest in the answers to the questions that I have asked, but have not gotten answers to? | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 08 2013 05:57 geript wrote: Why do you care more about your town meta than scum hunting? On July 08 2013 05:51 Xatalos wrote: Mainly because I've not been saying anything, but been seeing a couple posts saying I'm not playing like my normal town self. Add the vote and his reasoning for it, and I care about the answers to the questions I asked, given the bolded bit.I'll go ahead and vote austinmcc now. ##Vote austinmcc He's been basically just asking (filler) questions and not scumhunting or showing effort so far. At least he's less lurky than in PTP, but that's not a hard feat, and it's still not even close to how I remember his townie self. Just comparing his town meta to this game (or PTP) makes it feel like he has to be scum or 3rd party etc. I didn't push this stance hard enough in PTP, but I'm not going to repeat the same mistake now - unless he starts appearing townish ASAP. geript, you still want to lynch WoS or whom? | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 08 2013 06:04 raynpelikoneet wrote: Right now?Austin can you say something that helps us finding scum? Super active people need to stop posting so much. AMG THAT'S NOT SCUMHUNTING? Nope. Posting so much makes scumhunting harder, makes it more likely people will skim over important things, allows scum to hide, makes people who aren't contributing feel like they don't need to because other people are doing the work. If you guys calm down a little, finding scum will be easier. Other than that, I can't tell you anything at the moment, I don't think. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 08 2013 06:06 Xatalos wrote: As far as I can tell, you gave three reasons for thinking I'm scummy.Paranoia Mafia. That's the only game where we've played together as town so far, I think. Actually I suspected you there for some time (role-related stuff) but I didn't think your overall posting was scummy. In fact, I mentioned at several points how townish your posting was, and ultimately I came to the right and simple conclusion that you were indeed town. I can't say I get any of that same feeling in this game so far though. What does your last sentence mean? I'm basically just asking filler questions I'm not scumhunting/putting in effort I am not my townie self/I am not playing in accordance with my town meta My last sentence is in relation to your first reason for thinking I'm scum. If my questions are filler, they don't matter, and I'm not going anywhere with them. However, if you're actually interested in the answers to my questions, then they don't seem like they are filler. If you're not interested in the answers to my questions, I ... I dunno, I think you should be. As far as meta, go look at any larger game. Especially a larger game where I don't know 1/2 or 2/3 the people. My play in a single medium-size game, where I was blue, and almost got lynched because I was an idiot, doesn't seem like the perfect point of comparison. Or go look at my scum games. I was interested in what exactly you were pulling meta from, seeing as it appears to be a large part of your reason for voting me. That's it, was just poking at your reasons for voting me. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 08 2013 06:05 geript wrote: (1) We don't know if he's dead or not (He claims to be able to survive some nukes, we don't know whether nuke is real, we don't know if nuke kills even if he wasn't special, etc. etc.But he's a dead man walking, why do you care about his reasoning about thinking you're scum? Do you think he's scum? Plus, since he's got a nuke headed towards him why are you more concerned with his thoughts on you being anti-town versus actually trying to find other scum? (2) Even if he's dead, at least the two of you, and I think just a couple others, have said I don't look like myself. I'm interested in why, and he was the most forthcoming about his reasons here, rather than just "AMG SIMILAR TO PTP THAT JUST HAPPENED." | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 08 2013 06:17 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: There isn't a reason not to lynch him eventually, based on his play so far.xata, austin, and geript shut up for a second and tell me why we shouldn't lynch dandel On July 08 2013 06:10 raynpelikoneet wrote: I think that his filter is full of junk. His playful posts in the beginning add nothing. He's very, very ... accusatory/bristly, when I don't see a need for him to be. That's a characteristic to compare to past games. Early post towards you, later post towards johnny, just really being antagonistic when there's no reason. Beyond those, he's chimed in on a couple things but either after others have said the same thing, or with chiming that doesn't actually do anything/go anywhere. He don't look groovy.Austin what do you think of ON? Can you give me one good reason why Chezinu would as town nuke Xatalos? Yes. Xat fakenuked Chez. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 08 2013 06:31 Xatalos wrote: Okeedoke. Those are much better reasons, imo.Well, I did play with you in Paranoia (you were town) and PTP (you were scum). Your current play just seems closer to PTP, and that's my main reason for voting you. Your questions aren't really uninteresting in themself, but your way of posting them feels... uninterested I guess. You've just posted a series of questions here and there, but it's not making any kind of impact on the thread and you're not following up on them in any way. I'm not sure if you've even been answered to any of them? Doesn't look like it, just looking at your filter... There's no sense of discussion, drawing conclusions or anything, just some random questions thrown at the thread and then forgotten / not made use of. Also this post feels wrong. Weird complaining about the state of the thread, yet not doing anything about it or basically doing *anything* useful in the thread yourself. No, I haven't followed up. I reasked MZ, but he seems to be non-scummy on rayn at this point. So...question sorta answered. If he really pushed at scum rayn, I was going to find that scummy from him, because I didn't see his angle at all really in light of rayn's total posting. That may not matter depending on these nukes. Following up with some other stuff needs to wait. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 08 2013 06:33 raynpelikoneet wrote: You asked if I could see Areason. You didn't ask for a good one. But he gave a reason, and that's what it was.Austin: Are you seriously saying that is a good reason to nuke Xata? Like, why? As far as whether it's a good or bad reason, I don't care. His reasoning behind the nuke, IF THERE IS A NUKE, isn't telling on his alignment to me. I assume the fuel that powers that nuke's flight is fun, not scumhunting/fake scumhunting, and that it would be fun for either alignment of chez to fire off the "revenge" nuke. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 08 2013 06:47 Xatalos wrote: I need to wait for contribution in some cases because it's the answer/thought process itself that's more important to me than anything else someone has posted. Or, at least, that's the case with Onegu.Why do you need to wait for contribution.......? That's just a scummy/lazy/reactive approach instead of a townish/contributive/proactive approach. If you want me to unvote you, at least give some valid reason to do that. Also, yes. My play so far has been lazy/reactive. But as of right now, I'm doing what I'm doing. Also also, if you don't die, I have determined that you are town. Huzzah! | ||
| ||
