EPT/in
Fruity Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
/in | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 07 2013 18:03 VisceraEyes wrote: I wanted to lynch risk.nuke once for being a meanie. Radfield dickslapped me and so I shot the Godfather instead. The moral of this story is: risk.nuke is always a townie...and never not a townie. Spare the risk.nuke, spoil the mafia agenda. Or something like that. BYE I didn't know WBG already sent out the roles, VisceraEyes. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 14 2013 07:13 Coagulation wrote: hey guys im town. Clear scumtell, scum. Only scum would claim to be town while not actually town. You mind as well confess now. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
##vote: Zessionar For making statements that don't make sense. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 14 2013 21:25 Zessionar wrote: anyway... do you think syllos play is strange if he's town? No, because you want to get information out of others since you already know your own role. You can do that by pressure or by asking questions. Since apparently they have history, I don't find it surprising he'd go after Sandroba. if not, do you think yamatos question implies that it's strange? if yes, do think it's scummy to call syllos play strange, when it actually isnt strange at all? His post was before risk clarified that syllo and sandroba knew eachother well and that they can tell if the other is scum quickly. If he simply didn't understand the logic behind it, then I would consider it null. If he does know about their meta, then I'd consider it slightly strange/scummy. I would assume they have meta from the way syllo formulated his question, but I can understand the question. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 14 2013 21:29 Vivax wrote: Zess, scumreads? Do you think I'm town? Why are you asking someone if they think you're town, especially this early in the game? | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
Can't think of any where asking about scumreads wouldn't be better than town reads. Speaking of which. Who do you currently think is scum? | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 14 2013 22:17 Vivax wrote: Mattchew and WeWin have made bad posts so far, layabout didn't give a fuck about the votes on him and his activity has been grotesque. What about your scumreads?You think I'm town? I don't like Risk.nuke questioning posts that are obviously meant as a joke and taking them seriously (Zessioniar's initial vote), then defending himself by saying he's a poor scum player. I don't like WeWin or hiro for keeping information from town but I don't put much weight on it. I don't think Mattchew looks scum, that post doesn't feel scummy to me. Bad, yes, but not scummy. I also don't like your posts because they focus a lot on you and trying to find out what your image is. If you're town, you should be finding scum, not trying to find out how other people think about you. The post on WeWin I like though. Points out the same thing Risk.Nuke was doing; taking peopel posting for a laugh too serious. Considering both things you're null to me. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 14 2013 22:29 Mattchew wrote: Artanis what do you think of Vivax's scumreads post Anyone can name three names, but there's not much to go off yet. It doesn't really say anything to me other than information to help with reads later. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 14 2013 22:40 Vivax wrote: Artanis, why hasn't a single of your posts been directed towards these players if you have reason to believe they are scum? WinWin and HiroPro were already being pressured with the exact question I had, so I didn't feel the need to post it as well. I also don't see what answer risk.nuke could give to a question regarding not taking my post seriously yet taking that of Zess serious in any way that would help my read on him since it was about a gut response that would now be reasoned. Also, it's only a small tell to me, not enough to judge someone over immediately. I'd rather see if he gives me more reason to suspect him in future interactions. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 15 2013 04:28 Zessionar wrote: how is revealing me "protown" especially after i revealed myself to toad... Because then we have a reference point for how you usually play so we can figure you out rather than you remaining an enigma? Meta can help heaps, obviously. On February 15 2013 01:18 risk.nuke wrote: What are you talking about, are we playing the same game? I questioned somebody who put their vote on me. How did you interpret his post as obviously a joke? Furthermore I didn't say I'm a poor scumplayer to defend myself. I used the empirical evidence that I hadn't performed well as scum to prove that his claimed reasoning was false or more to the point, made up. So if you vote on someone it's suddenly serious? In that case, I suggest we analyze ObviousOne and Grush57 for their votes on LayAbout too. I don't think anyone that uses the average chance of lynching a mafia as reasoning is being serious, though with how he's been playing I may have been wrong on that. Zess, do you feel you're playing well this game? Do you think posting a lot of oneliners is better for town than putting your thoughts concisely into one post? If not, why are you doing so? | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
frantic: On February 15 2013 01:03 Zessionar wrote: where are you going with that shit, marv? do you want to make me look bad because of my super-earlygame posts? screw you. discussion ends right here. horribly reasoned: On February 14 2013 08:41 Zessionar wrote: i picked risk.nuke, because he's decent as scum and useless and paranoid as town... if he's town, i hope he'll prove me wrong this game... Without content Downright atrocious: On February 15 2013 02:18 Zessionar wrote: Another topic: Masons, claim! In general your game has been horrible. I don't know if you're scum or bad town, but I don't see any better candidate so far. How about you take your own advice and reason why your list is good? I'm guessing it's going to come down to the amount of posts, which is a terrible reason as you have a shitton of posts which amount to nothing. Furthermore On February 14 2013 21:25 Zessionar wrote: i am not sure if it's alignment indicative just yet. but yes, i never thought about pretending i am someone else, like he is... at least not as town, since smurfing in general is rather antitown - confusing everyone else with even more strange stuff seems to be too much. but he just could have made that part up, to keep his identity covered. right now he looks like toadesstern to me... with all the smilies... anyway... do you think syllos play is strange if he's town? if not, do you think yamatos question implies that it's strange? if yes, do think it's scummy to call syllos play strange, when it actually isnt strange at all? You say here that smurfing is anti town, yet you decided to smurf yourself without giving away your identity immediately after getting your role. Yet later, you state On February 15 2013 04:28 Zessionar wrote: how is revealing me "protown" especially after i revealed myself to toad... So smurfing is antitown, yet YOU getting revealed is antitown. Care to explain? | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 15 2013 23:34 Zessionar wrote: because a townie that wants to win is either honest and says he didnt do his homework or he fucking does his homework and doesnt come up with terrible cases. first four players... speedanalysis... Are you serious? | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On February 15 2013 23:40 Zessionar wrote: I said ____IN GENERAL____ IF you FAIL to read, I cannot help you Idiot. If you'd just read some of my former games, you'd see that i fucking die extremely early if i reveal myself. Calling people idiots is generally not a good way to hold a discussion. I also see precious little reason to presume you'd get shot early given how you've been playing. Last two games: Dessert: I got the Serialkiller day1 but couldnt get him lynched, Scumteam AND Serialkiller shot me night1 we lost that game Toads mafiagame: I got shot n2 and I correctly named the last two remaining scumteammembers in my final list. We won that game ________________ if I smurf and make sure, that I survive to day3, we win this game. So the general rule doesnt apply for me. Though I didn't know that, I'm not about to rely on you winning us the game by day 3. I haven't seen your previous game. I'm expecting you to prove to me THIS game that you're an 'exception', and so far you've been playing poorly (until these cases at least which I still need to read through more thoroughly) | ||
| ||
