• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:59
CEST 06:59
KST 13:59
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview25Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL46Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30
Community News
[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates7GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th12Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0EWC 2025 Regional Qualifier Results26Code S RO12 Results + RO8 Groups (2025 Season 2)3
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Magnus Carlsen and Fabi review Clem's chess game. BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th
Tourneys
Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Cheeseadelphia 2025 - Open Bracket LAN! $25,000+ WardiTV 2025 Series
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void
Brood War
General
Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans? BW General Discussion BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ I made an ASL quiz [BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 2 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 1
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
What do you want from future RTS games? Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0 Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Cognitive styles x game perf…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Poker
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 22634 users

Newbie Mini Mafia XXXVII

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
1 2 3 Next All
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 13 2013 20:17 GMT
#956
Hey guys. As you know I'm replacing 9-bit.

As it turns out I was somewhat of a last resort as a replacement and am actually pretty busy today with work. I should be able to catch up on the thread later tonight, hopefully by a little before the time night 1 is ending, and as such don't expect to be active in the thread until about then.

I look forward to playing once I get caught up. GLHF everyone~
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 13 2013 20:19 GMT
#957
On February 14 2013 05:13 zarepath wrote:
It almost sounds like the mods constructed a specimen made of the parts of fallen mafia vets, designed and and brought back to life with a single purpose of winning this game of mafia.

Haha, yeah. Let's go with that.
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 14 2013 00:59 GMT
#994
So I just finished reading the thread, although it was long enough that I felt the need to push myself to do so more quickly than I otherwise would have liked. (Thanks Mocsta and warbaby. ) I'm putting together a post with my overall thoughts now.
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 14 2013 01:59 GMT
#1025
On February 14 2013 10:17 Mocsta wrote:
(3) Your RB; town JK or scum RB?


Sylencia, I'd really like to know the answer to this.


Working on a post right now guys, will be up soon.
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 14 2013 02:00 GMT
#1026
EBWOP: Sorry just saw that he answered it. Misread it the first time.
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 14 2013 02:17 GMT
#1029
I was getting ready to write up a post about my thoughts on everyone so far, but when I got the results of the night actions I realized that that post would probably be overshadowed when I posted this, so I scrapped it for now.




I am the Tracker. As we know from the rules, the mafia chooses who will carry out each kill. From this we can conclude that the mafia will choose the player they percieve to be least suspicious on their team to carry out the kill. In an attempt to catch a potential least suspicous scum player, last night I tracked ObviousOne. The results were that he visisted WaveofShadow.

This means that one of the following is true:
(A) ObviousOne is a Vigilante, Jailkeeper or Watcher who targeted WaveofShadow.
(B) The framer chose to frame ObviousOne for the WaveofShadow kill.
(C) ObviousOne is the Nosy Neighbour and the RNG hit the 2/11 chance that he'd visit someone who was killed.
(D) ObviousOne is scum or serial killer and killed WaveofShadow.

A is unlikely for the following reasons. ObviousOne said himself that a Vigilante should have checked in ahead of time, making it unlikely that that is his role + Show Spoiler +
On February 14 2013 10:23 ObviousOne wrote:
Still have some time for a possible Vig to check in. I'm surprised there wasn't a claim given there was an hour window during which night actions were being put through, but that might just mean they're not able to respond yet. Going to have to assume SK if there isn't a claim in the next 24 hours.
. We know that he is not the Jailkeeper, because the Jailkeeper visisted Sylencia tonight. And its unlikely that he is a Watcher, not only because we already have a Tracker, and therefore it is less likely that we have a Watcher, but also because if he watched WaveofShadow he would have said something about who visited the person who was killed.

B is unlikely becuase there is little reason for the mafia to think that ObviousOne will get tracked.

C is unlikely mathematically. (Even if there is a 10% chance that OO is the Nosy Neighbour, a very high estimate, that means that there is a less than 2% likelihood of this occuring.)

From this I conclude that ObviousOne is the serial killer or scum and killed WaveofShadow.

##Vote: ObviousOne
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 14 2013 02:24 GMT
#1034
Oh, shoot, I did read it right the first time. Somehow I read this post as saying that he got role blocked by the good guys. Either way, I think that case is unlikely enough that we have no choice but to lynch OO today.
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 14 2013 02:28 GMT
#1036
On February 14 2013 11:22 Sevryn wrote:
alright so first holy shit at these Night kills I would imagine its a sk because of the vigi being one shots and there not being a great case on either of the people who died.
second I would like to point out some points of concern for me on corazon
1. He didnt vote for the person he claimed was the scummiest d1 instead voting for glurio with only two votes on glurio so it was still anybodys game as to who got lynched at the time he swapped his vote.
2.this part of his recent post seemed odd because a vote for me wasnt really a non vote seeing as I was the second closest person to being lynched.
Show nested quote +


WoS- I know this point has been discussed to death but I really don’t like the fact that he threw his vote away D1 (scum don’t usually care about the lynch unless it’s one of their own) and his non-vote for Sevryn was scummy as well.



I'm very suspicious of Corazon too. I was thinking about writing up a case on him, the timing of that vote was just so scummy to me. I'll hold off on that for now though as I assume people will want to discuss ObviousOne and his killing of WaveofShadow last night first.
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 14 2013 02:36 GMT
#1040
Its going to take an awful lot for him to get out of this. I can't see a scenario where we don't kill him today.... I guess we need to wait a little bit to solidify my tracker claim? I guess I'm more confident in this because I have the hard facts of me being the tracker and the results from tracking and you guys are getting it second hand.
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 14 2013 02:40 GMT
#1041
On February 14 2013 11:34 Mocsta wrote:
TestSubject,

I read the logic over a few times; I think the options listed are valid.

ObviousOne is a candidate for SK.. but I need to hear somethings from you first

Can you please clarify:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2013 11:17 TestSubject893 wrote:
B is unlikely becuase there is little reason for the mafia to think that ObviousOne will get tracked.

If scum did not value ObviousOne; why would you target him? That part of the story needs to be complete for me.


As an aside, we know ObviousOne isnt JK, because the kill went through despite a "JK block"
Completely agree on the vig logic deduction.


Second question:
Lets say ObviousOne claims VT => (COULD be Nosy Neghbour, he is not self-aware)
What do we do; do we lynch ObviousOne?
If so, if he flips town; does that mean we lynch you next?

I want to believe your claim; but the umm.. amazingness of it all is making me shocked all over again. I cant handle this twice in 2hours.
Really need your answers on the above; and feedback from ObviousOne.





I don't really understand what you mean by scum not valuing him, can you be more specific?

And since you predicted his action so well, I say yes kill him still. If by some stroke of terrible lick for the town he is the vigilante, we can kill me next, but that would probably result in a game loss since we'd be down like 4 more townies at that point. I think we just lose if he's vigilante, but that's a risk I'm fine taking.
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 14 2013 02:40 GMT
#1042
Terrible luck, not lick.
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 14 2013 02:43 GMT
#1043
On February 14 2013 11:35 ObviousOne wrote:
Well, fuck. There goes my shot at staying null.

I am Pops the Doorman and the Vigilante.

I shot WaveofShadow. I thought he was scum. I couldn't get a good read on him based on D1 and I felt it would give me insight into his back-and-forth with Corazon and thus more information about Corazon. Haven't looked yet at Corazon in light of the flip but now that it's out, you know where I was going with it and why I mentioned it earlier.

I don't believe in breadcrumbs (as you can see in the case of Zarepath, they aren't exactly invisible) and from what I've read/experienced in normal games, breadcrumbs are a good way to get yourself killed with a power role.

I also didn't want to give scum a chance at finding a confirmed town for tomorrow so I just kept quiet.


Give the scum a chance at confirmed town? You guys already know who is town, its everyone who isn't on your team~
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 14 2013 02:52 GMT
#1047
Do you still need me to address B Mocsta? I'm still not really sure what you're asking.
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 14 2013 03:02 GMT
#1052
I'm still not buying it. :/
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 14 2013 03:07 GMT
#1057
I'm pretty new to playing this game online, but I think what he's doing now is called busing.

In all honesty, Corazon is at the top of my list for players to pressure once we're sure we're killing OO.
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 14 2013 03:14 GMT
#1063
Do you really think he's SK though? And even if he is.... I'm not sure that's a great idea, lol.
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 14 2013 03:31 GMT
#1075
I'm heading to bed for the night and will be busy in the morning tomorrow, so I'm out of here for probably 14 or 15 hours. Hopefully there are no more questions about my post.
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 14 2013 20:19 GMT
#1124
Back and getting up to date with the thread now.
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 14 2013 20:58 GMT
#1125
On February 14 2013 13:34 ObviousOne wrote:
I have altered the deal. Pray I do not alter it further.

The rebels shall bow before the power of this fully armed and operational battlestation.

I love the star wars reference, but the answer is no. Its just not worth the risk for town, plus my gut says you're scum not SK anyway. (This post + Show Spoiler +
On February 15 2013 00:33 ObviousOne wrote:
I just wanted to kill someone with my newfangled power.

As for how to play it after the tracker claim I really just winged it. I'm not the best of liars and didn't read the OP super well replacing in nor did I do any setup speculation based on my own role. Really think it could have gone differently without Test's claim but as they say, "They say it don't be like it is, but it do".

screams lying to me.)

On a side note, if OO is SK, this post + Show Spoiler +
On February 14 2013 11:50 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2013 11:35 ObviousOne wrote:
Well, fuck. There goes my shot at staying null.

I am Pops the Doorman and the Vigilante.

I shot WaveofShadow. I thought he was scum. I couldn't get a good read on him based on D1 and I felt it would give me insight into his back-and-forth with Corazon and thus more information about Corazon. Haven't looked yet at Corazon in light of the flip but now that it's out, you know where I was going with it and why I mentioned it earlier.

I don't believe in breadcrumbs (as you can see in the case of Zarepath, they aren't exactly invisible) and from what I've read/experienced in normal games, breadcrumbs are a good way to get yourself killed with a power role.

I also didn't want to give scum a chance at finding a confirmed town for tomorrow so I just kept quiet.

I have serious problems with this claim

as TestSubject pointed out.
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2013 11:17 TestSubject893 wrote:
A is unlikely for the following reasons. ObviousOne said himself that a Vigilante should have checked in ahead of time, making it unlikely that that is his role
On February 14 2013 10:23 ObviousOne wrote:
Still have some time for a possible Vig to check in. I'm surprised there wasn't a claim given there was an hour window during which night actions were being put through, but that might just mean they're not able to respond yet. Going to have to assume SK if there isn't a claim in the next 24 hours.


Then there is:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2013 10:03 Mocsta wrote:
This is total bullshit:

If there is a vig out there; you better have breadcrumbs.

proper vig play, is to say who you are killing in the last minute before deadline (in this case you had 1 hr)

Newbie games always 1-shot vig; so if present, you are now VT; its safe to speak up

Now, i said @ 10:03 it is SAFE TO SPEAK UP, you are now VT

note @ 10:23 ObviousOne
says
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2013 10:23 ObviousOne wrote:
Still have some time for a possible Vig to check in. I'm surprised there wasn't a claim given there was an hour window during which night actions were being put through, but that might just mean they're not able to respond yet. Going to have to assume SK if there isn't a claim in the next 24 hours.


##Vote: ObviousOne

You just fucked up majorly Mr.SK

from Mocsta looks kind of like a scum slip. (Mocsta did already address it though and say he was just assuming. I'm still up in the air on what to think of it.)




On February 14 2013 13:49 cDgCorazon wrote:

Show nested quote +
On February 14 2013 11:22 Sevryn wrote:
alright so first holy shit at these Night kills I would imagine its a sk because of the vigi being one shots and there not being a great case on either of the people who died.
second I would like to point out some points of concern for me on corazon
1. He didnt vote for the person he claimed was the scummiest d1 instead voting for glurio with only two votes on glurio so it was still anybodys game as to who got lynched at the time he swapped his vote.


Are you fucking kidding me...


+ Show Spoiler +

On February 14 2013 05:33 cDgCorazon wrote:
Why I voted for Glurio

I've justified this vote in a few posts, but since it's obvious none of you are interested in reading my filter, here I go.

First of all, the point has been raised that I didn't follow through on this quote:

Show nested quote +
On February 12 2013 14:38 cDgCorazon wrote:
I want to try something different this game. If we keep LAL-ing we're not going to find scum. We haven't found scum D1 in a long time, so perhaps we should take a look at how we evaluate D1 in order to have a better chance of lynching scum (which would put them at a huge disadvantage if we could get one). We're never going to get better at Mafia unless we analyze what we are doing wrong and trying to make an effort to fix it. We can't just keep sitting here and say "Ok, we're gonna LAL. Cross your fingers everyone". I've said this before, but we need to have faith in our ability to find scum. I'm putting my confidence in scum-hunting into this vote. I think you should too (with whoever you think is scum).


And this one:
Show nested quote +
On February 13 2013 08:50 cDgCorazon wrote:
If we're going to keep thinking that all "loud voices" are town, at least one scum is going to slip by for a long time.
Take a look at my scum play from NMM XXXIII. Why do you think I got away with being scum for so long? Because I was active and looking pro-town.

If we take out a scum with a "loud voice" now, our chances of winning go way up.


Anyone who says this should also have looked at this quote:

Show nested quote +
On February 12 2013 15:23 cDgCorazon wrote:
One thing that I want to add to my paragraph: If the town decides to reinvent it's play, the scum have to adjust to it. This could be a good way to catch scum (in theory), as the changes they would have to make would be a lot easier to screw up than the town's changes. That's only true if all of the town players buy in to reinventing their game, which is hard to do.


Take notice of the bolded part. Me making this change to actually take out scum reads D1 would only work if the whole town bought into the change. This did not happen. Everyone continued to try to get lurkers to talk and to make arguments against 5-6 players (which isn't the best idea in the closing hours before the lynch as we needed to consolidate). I pointed this out in a few posts why I did not vote for WB:

Show nested quote +
On February 13 2013 08:19 Sn0_Man wrote:
On February 13 2013 08:12 cDgCorazon wrote:
On February 12 2013 14:38 cDgCorazon wrote:
Alright, since it's obvious no one is going to look at my filter, here are the reasons that I've already stated why I think WB is scum:

-Claiming town way too hard
-Playing victim from XXXVI
-No actual scumhunting
-Asking Mocsta to stop pressuring him
-

-Sheeping on everything that comes his way
-Hiding in the shadows after the pressure died down on him
-Saying we should vote for Sylencia because he's lurking and playing similar to the game he played scum in
(when in fact Glurio has exhibited the same behavior and multiple people have been lurking)


Everything in bold, I feel like he has continued to exhibit the behavior or has not adequately answered. Everything below the line is in my second case


Warbaby. These are the reasons I'm voting for you.
You're not reading my filter. You're not taking the time to give me full answers, just OMGUSing and making emotional responses.


There are others who post less who have also contributed no actual scumhunting
The "why don't we both stop posting for a bit" post seems quite reasonable to me. The thread was being clouded with a ton of irrelevant yammer.
The fact that warbaby has echoed others is lamentable but not unique. Sometimes you agree with a case that is presented.
The fact that he wishes to vote for Sylencia is also not unreasonable. In fact, it could be construed as scumhunting. It isn't like Sylencia is a WORSE target than many other lurkers.

None of what I say makes any claim to "prove" WB as town, but it gives reasonable doubt to his scumminess (IMO). As such, I still request that we lynch somebody with extremely low post-count and contributions. I feel like you are tunnelling really hard for no reason cora. I'm still willing to look at a WB lynch for sure, BUT NOT TODAY.




Show nested quote +
On February 13 2013 08:57 cDgCorazon wrote:
On February 13 2013 08:53 WaveofShadow wrote:
On February 13 2013 08:50 cDgCorazon wrote:
On February 13 2013 08:47 geript wrote:
Point out what you'd like. I haven't made a case against many people; neither, iirc, have I weighed in on 0 post non-participant vs low count lurker. Those facts are hardly relevant.

I'd point out that no one has really made a case against you at all. As far as I see it, your agenda has been to make the town atmosphere negative. Yes, it takes two to get into a flame war and I'm not giving war baby any credit avoiding those spats either. In the least Mocsta has shown that he's willing to listen, even though I think his vote for me is weak at best. You on the other hand have tunnel visioned on your target of the moment at each point. Scum hunting is fine and being aggressive is fine. But the belligerent tone you've taken at many points, especially over exceptionally minor things, isn't beneficial to the town. Rather, it seems to me like you want everyone to spend their time scrutinizing your target so that they avoid you entirely. Your "We haven't gotten scum day 1 lynching lurkers, so lets try a new tack" comment from a while back (would quote but still on phone) keeps on sounding like "Let's lynch a loud voice" to me. In my experience the louder voices are almost always town; I even think one of the guides says something similar.

Now you're going to ask why I'm not voting for you (likely), but I still think that you're misguided right now and not an active dissident. So my vote remains in place for right now.


Please explain to me why being aggressive is scummy.

If we're going to keep thinking that all "loud voices" are town, at least one scum is going to slip by for a long time.
Take a look at my scum play from NMM XXXIII. Why do you think I got away with being scum for so long? Because I was active and looking pro-town.

If we take out a scum with a "loud voice" now, our chances of winning go way up.

Speaking of loud voices, you were SO adamant for so long on WB lynch now that's it's close to lynch time you unvote? What is your rationale?


Cause it's obvious no one is going to vote with me.
Sometimes, one's agenda needs to be pushed back to benefit the group as a whole. I didn't back down before because I wasn't sure how the votes were going to be consolidated. Since it's obvious town does not want to try something different for D1, it looks like it's not going to be WB.


Show nested quote +
On February 13 2013 09:51 cDgCorazon wrote:
Glurio, I've outlined my reasons why I'm not voting for WB, but still think he's scum.

I would love to see WB get lynched today, but I know it's not going to happen. I have to choose between little things like your OMGUS vote and the fact that I'm not going to make the same vote as my top scumread...


I felt like Sn0 made great points and the fact that he said he was open to voting for WB later made me feel secure that I wasn't going to lose all of the traction in my case due to new developments happening. That's why I switched onto Glurio. But why Glurio? I made a few explanations:

Show nested quote +
On February 13 2013 09:03 cDgCorazon wrote:
On February 13 2013 08:58 Mocsta wrote:
On February 13 2013 08:50 cDgCorazon wrote:
Take a look at my scum play from NMM XXXIII. Why do you think I got away with being scum for so long? Because I was active and looking pro-town.

Disagree.

You got HEAPZ of town cred because Spag was mislynched sticking up for you. Made everyone auto-assume you were town.
You maintained the town cred by being involved in discussion; but IIRC you didnt step on toes or push your own agenda =>> active blendy


Alright we can talk about this later.

Anyways, my vote is for _______. They haven't done much scumhunting, they've lurked for most of the game, and as the evidence shows, there's always a lurker scum.

Who I'm filling in the blank with is still up in the air. I'm looking at either Glurio, Mandalor, or Geript.


Show nested quote +
On February 13 2013 09:23 cDgCorazon wrote:
@WoS Why in the world are you bringing this up now?

It's a hard decision for me to make (because there is nothing to choose from between the two). I'm guessing Mandalor's vote is just him not thinking.

Lynching Glurio would go a long way in either proving or disproving my case towards WB. His town claim is even stupider than WB's as well. There's not much else to say.

##Vote: Glurio


Show nested quote +
On February 13 2013 09:46 cDgCorazon wrote:
I'm not going to vote for Syl because I think WB is scum and he has been trying to get us to lynch Syl for at least 12 hours. It wouldn't make sense for me to vote for my top scumread's scum read (Mandalor would you like to exhibit this logic as well?).


Show nested quote +
On February 13 2013 09:48 cDgCorazon wrote:
On February 13 2013 09:47 glurio wrote:
##Vote: Cora

For blatant sheeping.


OMGUS.



Show nested quote +
On February 13 2013 09:51 cDgCorazon wrote:
Glurio, I've outlined my reasons why I'm not voting for WB, but still think he's scum.

I would love to see WB get lynched today, but I know it's not going to happen. I have to choose between little things like your OMGUS vote and the fact that I'm not going to make the same vote as my top scumread...


Show nested quote +
On February 13 2013 10:18 cDgCorazon wrote:
On February 13 2013 10:14 warbaby wrote:
On February 13 2013 10:09 Mocsta wrote:
On February 13 2013 10:07 warbaby wrote:
On February 13 2013 10:03 Mocsta wrote:
Look, we need a game plan moving forward; this obviously wasnt ideal

can i suggest we stop talking about blues

(im looking at you sn0)... with NK this cycle; lets not help out the scum pls

warbaby
you were the only person dead set against glurio (that commented)
Can you please give more reason than meta to why you thuoght he was town; you said my reasoning was sound, yet you refused to jump on... I want to know why.


I never said I thought he was town, I said I didn't think he was scum. My read wasn't any better than null, in the post I linked earlier. You insinuating I called him town is putting WIFOM into my mouth, which is not what I said.

One of the people that lynched glurio is scum. I refuse to believe 3 towns lynched him. We need to focus on:

Sevryn
Mocsta
cdgCorazon

And perhaps we can find a scum. It's fine if you guys still want to make cases on me, but I didn't just lynch a townie.

Sevryn seems the most questionable. He really needs to post a lot more to show he's not a lurky scum.

True, i just read the post again; sorry for the misrepresentation.
That you stood up for me, made me think you thought he was town.
Not sure why you would step in to defend a "null' read; even now with hindsight, thats an odd move to make.


Because why would I lynch, or agree to the lynch of, someone I have a null read on, when there are lurkers like sylencia (at the time) and sevryn still in the game?


Because Glurio and Syl were/are playing the same type of game (lurking) in my eyes, and apparently others agreed (by looking at the votes).


Show nested quote +
On February 13 2013 10:13 cDgCorazon wrote:
On February 13 2013 10:09 WaveofShadow wrote:
On February 13 2013 10:07 cDgCorazon wrote:
On February 13 2013 08:47 geript wrote:
Your "We haven't gotten scum day 1 lynching lurkers, so lets try a new tack" comment from a while back (would quote but still on phone) keeps on sounding like "Let's lynch a loud voice" to me. In my experience the louder voices are almost always town; I even think one of the guides says something similar.

Now you're going to ask why I'm not voting for you (likely), but I still think that you're misguided right now and not an active dissident. So my vote remains in place for right now.


Hey guess what, we didn't "lynch a loud voce" and he flipped town...

Uh...glurio was plenty loud right at the end with his ass on the line.


But overall he was quiet. His filter is about a page and a half. Not a lot over 48 hours, especially with at least a third of it 30 minutes before lynch.


My justification for the vote was there. I put three people who I felt like voting for:

Geript
Mandalor
Glurio

I didn't vote for Sylencia because I think WB is scum, why would I vote with him?

I didn't vote for Geript because it was obvious he wasn't going to get lynched.

I had to choose between Mandalor and Glurio. Glurio's ridiculously stupid town claim put my vote on him and his OMGUS vote stayed me on him.

I've stated multiple times that there wasn't much to choose from between the 4 players. Glurio's actions the last hour of play (a majority of his posts) looked the scummiest to me and so I voted for him.

I didn't jump on Syl's vote because 2 wasn't enough to lynch Warbaby and (as I've said) it was obvious that no one wanted to lynch him.

I didn't want to stay on WB because the vote was 3-2-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1 (exaggeration) and I didn't want to add another "1". My plan of "sticking with my guns" was assuming for a vote of 5-3-1 (or something similar). I did not want to waste my vote when it became a lot more valuable. So I committed to someone who was going to get lynched today.

If you guys have any questions, feel free to ask.


On February 14 2013 13:51 cDgCorazon wrote:
Just so I can be the first one to point it out...

Show nested quote +
On February 13 2013 08:25 cDgCorazon wrote:
Fine. I'll back down.

##unvote

In the effort of choosing who to vote for, I'd like to point out that WB, Geript, and Glurio have not made any strong arguments against each other (and WB/Geript have explicitly said they don't think the other is scum/is town).


Show nested quote +
On February 14 2013 08:04 cDgCorazon wrote:
My Last Will


Just in case I do get killed tonight. I’m not sure what the odds are, but I know they’re greater than zero. So as a preventative measure, I will post some thoughts on other players in the game.

Warbaby- You all know my thoughts about WB. I’m going to lay off for a little bit and pursue other reads (if I survive). Sn0 is right about the confirmation bias thing. Perhaps it’s started to set in a bit. I’m still suspicious, but I’ll save it for later.

Geript- In all honesty, his case against me had a little bit of merit, but most of my answers were in the other posts on my filter. The interesting part is that he is only focusing on my vote for Glurio when there are 2 other people who helped seal Glurio’s lynch. His whole strategy of setting up half-cases so that others can finish them off is lazy town at best, scummy at worse. However, I would still like to give him the benefit of the doubt that he is adjusting to a different way of playing Mafia. I think he got a bit too emotional when he said Moc and I were basically forcing him out of the game.

WoS- I know this point has been discussed to death but I really don’t like the fact that he threw his vote away D1 (scum don’t usually care about the lynch unless it’s one of their own) and his non-vote for Sevryn was scummy as well. I’ll be keeping an eye out on him.

Syl/Mandalor/Sevryn/OO/Testsubject(Basically everyone who fit how Glurio was playing)- Post more (or do a better job than the person you replaced). Don’t wait until the lynch deadline gets close to give us your reads. Be proactive scumhunters.

I’m sorry this is probably shorter than it should be, but I must go to work.



Corazon still has my eye as the scummiest player (other than OO). When I read through D1 I kept asking myself "how does this turn into a glurio lynch?". The answer was Corazon's vote. It made glurio the first to 3 votes, effectively guarenteeing that either glurio or sevryn would be lynched. I also read the begining of his N1 will as "Look at me, I'm town just like everyone else". The first part is just more long-winded than it needs to be, of course you think you can die tonight if you're town; there's no need to explain that.




On February 14 2013 23:14 zarepath wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2013 11:15 Mocsta wrote:
Whoah whoah, dont run away so fast;

This DT stuff is adding even more confusion to my last will comment to you.
On February 14 2013 09:48 Mocsta wrote:
Mocsta N1: Last Will

[zarepath]I am so conflicted with this guy. In my opinion, his "fake case" actually unsettled town and is responsible for creating this split vote outcome.
I am still trying to piece together whether the outcome was simply not thought through enough (town); OR intentional (scum).
My concern is that, zarepath did not deliver the thorough analysis of this "experiment" like promised - at least I dont recall reading it. I also noticed at the end of Night 1, zarepath shared some reads; but these are based on the thread dynamics, not his experiment (conveniently....) I think zarepath needs to provide *VERY* clear reasoning behind his actions this Day2. If needs be; pressure him for this.

Remember, the experiment itself is NULL. It comes down to WHAT he does with the information.

Im going to give you a quick run down on my worst-case interpretation:
  • Scum/SK looking for easy town cred
    spots a claim; cos your not town, run with an assumption that DT exists, and builds a fake case
  • The case doesnt get as much traction as you wanted; though no one broke it down, not many actually supported it with a vote.
  • You decide its better to gain town cred by ousting the play; and you did receive town cred
  • You promise analysis, and never follow through; just providing an easy summary list.

If I look at you in best case scenario:
  • You are VT
  • You spot the "claim" and being VT, u didnt pay attention to the OP and have a brilliant idea to build a fake case to see reactions.
  • The case doesnt get as much traction as you wanted; though no one broke it down, not many actually supported it with a vote.
  • You decide to give up the shenanigans and again spot more reactions.
  • You promise analysis; life got busy, or you saw nothing of note, and did not follow through.

The problem I have with 'best-case scenario" is; if there was nothing of note to provide analysis; why not just spill the beans instead of moving along like nothing happened? (Its obviously too late to say anything now, its just WIFOM)

Lastly, as I said before, i think your case was a major issue to why we could not consolidate votes Day1.

I want need detailed answers behind your reasoning zarepath.


I don't see how my case prevented consolidated votes; the foremost problem was the lack of a clear, compelling case from ANYONE. I can hardly take responsibility for everyone else's lack of strong cases. I can certainly take responsibility for my last-minute Mocsta vote based mostly on the fact that I didn't feel that strongly about any of the other candidates.

I gave up the shenanigans because I determined that in the long run it would do more harm than good, and that we needed several hours of clarity in order to put forth a good lynch. Honestly, a clear lynch target didn't come out of my fake case. I'm curious to see how Obvious flips tonight, because he visited Wave, and if he were mafia I think that people who completely ignored my case look scummier (they saw the DT claim and decided to kill him at night, although there's no nominal DT).

I was looking for two things -- people who liked my case and would agree with it but not actually do anything, and those who do not really process it or look at it critically. Those would be people who knew that person was town but didn't mind them dying and want to take credit for discussion/participation (ie, scum). This is why Warbaby, Sylencia, and Mandalor have all looked scummy to me. Warbaby immediately latched onto the case with no analysis, it was the first case Syl said anything about at all and he pretty much entirely agreed while adding a minor point to it, and Mandalor did something similar.

Mocsta, actually, first said "quite a few good points in that case," calling some educated assumptions and others anti-town, but not explaining which ones. In the end, he does do an analysis of Wave's defense as opposed to Warbaby's defense and concludes that Wave actually looks town in comparison to Warbaby. This is at a point when the fake lynch still hasn't taken off, it's sitting at 2 votes (myself and geript). So this makes your reaction to my fake case less scummy than that of Warbaby, Sylencia, and Mandalor, imo.

Sn0 "liked the case" but didn't want to lynch an active player D1, but then really disliked his defense. He wasn't super eager to go after him at first, so I didn't see that as scummy. Corazon liked specific parts of it but cautioned that the same points could be brought up against others. Geript is the one who actually broke down my case the most, and while in the end it led to him voting for Wave, he was obviously thinking critically, which led to my town read on him.

So while I could say that as a result of this tactic Warbaby, Sylencia, Mandalor, and Mocsta are three scum and 1 SK, that's obviously going too far. Sometimes town just says they like a case and don't think real hard about it. Perhaps a desperate Warbaby was just happy to see any case that wasn't on him, etc. But I still think that they are strikes against these people.


My read on zarepath right now and his D1 anit-case or whatever it was is that zare is just overthinking things for a newbie game. I think he did add to the confusion D1, but I see it as a bad town play, not a scum play.




On February 15 2013 01:00 Sn0_Man wrote:
This whole SK situation is pretty awkward. Due to the lack of counter Vig claim by now, it is clear that we do have an SK. On the other hand, we can't prove that it is ObviousOne. If he were mafia, then there is NO WAY the real SK would claim.

Either way, OO is an anti-town role.

However, at this point his actions still make me think it likely that OO is the serial killer not somebody else. If that is true, then town can think about "manipulating" the SK. Because at this point, the SK wants to kill scum anyway (since killing too much town leaves him vulnerable to scum, who are more coordinated than town). So if we let the SK live on the premise that he will shoot scum, then it is good. However, a) I don't think OO knows who scum is any better than anybody else and b) given the roleblock happening, and assuming it is scum, they can roleblock the SK every night and still kill with impunity until they have lynch-control. Because the SK has veteran status (+1 night life), I'm guessing scum want to lynch him not shoot him.

So we arrive at a funny point where scum wish very much to lynch the SK rather than shoot him, yet I believe it is also in towns best interest to lynch him (because scum fairly clearly has the tools to shut down the SK, and because I'm not convinced the SK will be able/willing to hit scum anyway). As previously mentioned, I don't really see how town can "Control" the SK since our votes are so awful. I mean, if we all ask the SK to NK a different person, he can do whatever he wants to right?

Another point of interest: If you read how C9++ setups are rolled, there can be either 2 OR 3 mafia associated with a 13 player SK game. While I'm aware that this setup is obviously not C9++, I'm assuming the balance would be similar. An interesting note is that I'm guessing the power level of our blue roles is lower than that of those in C9++, which would lead me to believe that a more accurate balance would be 2 scum not 3. This is just speculation.

I will point out that if there are only 2 mafia, I expect that they can guess that there is an SK. In that situation, it might be valuable to look and see if anybody "jumped" to the serial killer conclusion (aka already knew).

Long post, but TL:DR; My vote stays.


I agree completely. Good analysis sn0_man.




On February 15 2013 03:20 warbaby wrote:
I'm not quite done talking about the TestSubject/ObviousOne situation. Right now I believe TS's claim, but I'm not sure about OO's SK claim. A few scenarios I don't think we can rule out (although it's very tenuous logic):

1) Both TS and OO are scum, TS is bussing OO in a very elaborate way. OO is not SK, so we still have to deal with 2 night kills after OO flips scum. This seems very unlikely, but would be a huge problem for town.
2) TS is Watcher and OO is scum. OO is trying to save his ass, and anybody giving credence to his SK cooperation offer may be scum trying to help him survive longer. This is also a big problem for town because SK and 2 scum are still alive after OO dies.
3) Assume the game balance is currently 6:3:1 (town:scum:sk). If we lynch OO and he flips SK, this leaves the game balance at 6:3 (town:scum). D3 will be 5:3. If we mislynch D4, we'll be at 3:3 and lose. So if we commit to lynching OO as SK, we can't mislynch.

Thoughts on other stuff:

+ Show Spoiler [Some Mocsta Meta] +

Mocsta's filter from Normal Mini IV where he was Town. Note that he posts a fairly comprehensive analysis of several players shortly after replacing into that game. He didn't do that in this game until the end of N1.
Mocsta's filter from LIX as town. Note the lack of massive wall of text posts and bullshit spewing on D1. Also note the way he's more open to discussing many players, not just the 2-4 players he's willing to lynch.
Mocsta's filter from XXXV as scum. Note the proliferation of big posts D1, lots of aggressive attempts to define the town agenda. Very similar to his D1 play in this game, IMO.

So based on purely this meta analysis, I believe Mocsta could be scum. Maybe he realized he was giving himself away too much, so now he's cooled his jets a bit, to blend back in with the less aggressive towns?


+ Show Spoiler [Zarepath] +

Zarepath tried a fake case on D1 to see if he could get any information either by pressuring WoS or analyzing the reaction to his case. My reaction to the case was "that's interesting, let's see what WoS says, before I consider voting him". Zarepath implies I got all excited about his case, which I did not. He continues to tunnel people based on a fake case from D1 -- he needs to move past this.


+ Show Spoiler [Mandalor] +

Also tunneling me over a falsification of my reaction to Zarepath's fake case. Looks scummy, continues to lurk and make shitty posts. After OO is dead, I'm much more interested in lynching mandalor at this point than sevryn.


As for number 1, if you've got any questions for me, go ahead and ask away. I'm not sure what else to tell you.

I think number 2 is a very likely scenario, but also consider that there could be only 2 scum. As for your numbers concerns in 3, if he is scum the numbers are 6:2:1 after lynch, and then 4:2:1 for D3 if SK hits a townie. We mislynch and then we're either at 1:2:1 or 2:1:1 and probably lose both of those too. I'd say no matter what we can't mislynch tomorrow without being in a bad spot.




On February 15 2013 04:06 Sn0_Man wrote:
The 2 replacements are going to get lynched and NK'ed and we are gonna end up in much the same situation as if they were modkilled rofl. (okay we have more info hopefully).

Either way, what now becomes interesting is what happens tomorrow. It will be EITHER 5-3 OR 6-2 depending on setup. However, we can't know which. This is a fascinating situation because I think it may actually call for a no-lynch. Or at least, I don't know yet who I wish to lynch and a No-lynch is remarkably reasonable. In the 5-3 case we go down to 4-3, which is extremely risky but hopefully town should be able to locate the scum in such a situation. In the 6-2 case we go down to 5-2, which isn't even MYLO so town then has a safe mislynch. While town won't know, it doesn't seem that unreasonable.

Keep in mind that in the 3-scum case, mislynch tomorrow is GG.


Jailer save me~
TestSubject893
Profile Joined September 2009
United States774 Posts
February 14 2013 21:05 GMT
#1126
Also this post + Show Spoiler +
On February 14 2013 12:35 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2013 12:26 Sevryn wrote:
On February 14 2013 12:22 Mocsta wrote:
On February 14 2013 12:19 Sevryn wrote:
Hey mocsta why did you say mr. sk but not scum? do you already know he isn't scum?

Hi Mr. lurker,

Well I didnt think he was scum before the killing, so wasn't a natural thought to assume he is scum now.

Either way; I am certain he is scum/SK now; and should be the lynch candidate for today.

Are you going to continue lurking and taking snipes?
Or
are you going to join town and rid us of EVIL !!

hey im working on not lurking and have posted my views on corazon which I would love to hear what you think about it. if we decide to lynch OO which I think we should We have Two whole days to talk about who to lynch next which is a huge bonus. i do think we should stay away from arguements that involve speculating on what his flip means till he flips that way we dont get distracted on what it means.

hmmm, Corazon hasnt been on my mind to be honest; I think someone made a case (?Geript IIRC) - which I guess is suspect, knowing that that OO killed WoS no matter alignment.

I can look into it; but I still want more information from zarepath first.

this SK dilemna has clouded the thread somewhat (deserving though albeit) so things like my questions to zarepath are buried.

Taking a break regardless

strikes me as Mocsta trying to deflect the conversation away from talking about Corazon. Could be nothing though.
1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PiG Daily
00:40
DH Dallas Replay Casts
Clem vs SHIN
Reynor vs herO
ShowTime vs SHIN
Serral vs Solar
PiGStarcraft477
LiquipediaDiscussion
Replay Cast
00:00
2025 KFC #9: SC Evolution
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft477
Nina 199
StarCraft: Brood War
PianO 364
Leta 317
BeSt 231
TY 106
Mind 50
Noble 13
Bale 5
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm122
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 841
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K677
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang01052
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor64
Other Games
summit1g8746
WinterStarcraft431
Mew2King106
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick902
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH288
• practicex 24
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 32
• Azhi_Dahaki10
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1455
• Stunt417
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
5h 1m
Bellum Gens Elite
5h 1m
Reynor vs ShoWTimE
Serral vs Lambo
Clem vs Zoun
SC Evo League
7h 1m
Fire Grow Cup
10h 1m
CSO Contender
12h 1m
BSL: ProLeague
13h 1m
StRyKeR vs MadiNho
Cross vs UltrA
TT1 vs JDConan
Bonyth vs Sziky
Replay Cast
19h 1m
SOOP Global
22h 1m
Creator vs Rogue
Cure vs Classic
SOOP
1d 4h
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 5h
[ Show More ]
AllThingsProtoss
1d 6h
Fire Grow Cup
1d 10h
BSL: ProLeague
1d 13h
HBO vs Doodle
spx vs Tech
DragOn vs Hawk
Dewalt vs TerrOr
Replay Cast
1d 19h
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
GSL Code S
4 days
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Replay Cast
4 days
GSL Code S
5 days
herO vs TBD
Classic vs TBD
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
GSL Code S
6 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 1
DreamHack Dallas 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
2025 GSL S2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.