EPTNewbie Mini Mafia XXXII
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On December 02 2012 18:20 Oatsmaster wrote: CC IS NOT PLAYING??? </3 On December 02 2012 19:34 DarthPunk wrote: You should /in. Then we can dub you all the class of XXXI-XXXII. <3 On December 02 2012 19:47 Promethelax wrote: Cheese, brah, why you gotta play me like this? C'mon man, this game is for you. Don't leave me hanging. Convinced. You all have earned the honor of the Cheesecake's last /in /unOBS /in I'm 3 for 3 right now, so you all better not fuck it up. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
edit: host never trolls, EVER. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On November 27 2012 11:57 Oatsmaster wrote: also to everyone who said that I tunneled CC, You do not understand what tunneled MEANS. On December 03 2012 11:49 Oatsmaster wrote: Step 1: Tunnel the vettiest player off their first post Step 2: Lynch All Lurkers Step 3: Claim Blue Step 4: ???? Step 5: WIN Nice contradiction, brah. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
Howdy y'all! My name is Mr. Cheesecake, sheriff 'round these parts. A few questions to start things off: 1.) How many games of Mafia have you played / obs'd? Include roles if you wish. 2.) Would you lynch a lurker (I.E, few posts, little content) over a minor-moderate scumread? Explain. 3.) What is your favorite color? For me: 1) Never obs, played three games. First as scum, next two as town. 2) Considering the last game, no. I should have stuck to my Yamato lynch because, as the game progressed, him being scum kept recurring in my head and I couldn't shake the possibility. The munk lynch, esp. it being a last minute switch by me, was a mistake. 3) Crimson. RIP GMarshal  | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
Also, Axle, opinion on lurker lynching over a moderate scumread - GO. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On December 04 2012 10:55 Kickstart wrote: Yes, that is why you say "don't lurk or else" and move on, not spend numerous pages discussing it and asking questions about policy lynching - spending tons of time discussing policy lynch is unproductive. As soon as everyone agrees that lurking will make people seriously consider lynching you move on. It's been like a page. Calm yourself. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
What do you believe is the best thing for a good town atmosphere Day 1? @Kickstart You seem totes paranoid right now, lol. @Oats Besides not being a total obv scummer, what was the best thing you learned from last game? | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
In your opinion, what differentiates bad(newbie) town play from scum play? | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On December 04 2012 11:15 yamato77 wrote: EBWOP: Also, why do you ask? I struggled with reading the terrible town (obvious scummers were actually town) from the actual scum lying underneath the surface. Think to yourself what you will need to look for in scum this game. Analyze everyone's cases for motive and rhetoric: Do they actually believe this guy is suspicious? Or is he just calling him bad / putting on a show?. Bad logic can be applied by either faction. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On December 04 2012 11:16 Rad wrote: @kick sorry missed the jkjk =/ I'm quick to jump on shit ideas ^^ What did Kick's "shit idea" tell you in terms of alignment? If Kick truly believed he wanted to lynch Oats for behavior last game, is that scum motivated? @Sylencia Come dip your feet in the water of discussion, it's fine once you get used to it. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On December 04 2012 11:36 Rad wrote: Yes, lynching someone strictly based on their play in a previous game seems stupid. Town wants to lynch scum, not shoot in the dark and hope. Scum wants to do stupid shit like lynch the easy target. Do you read that idea differently? Would you be ok with the idea of lynching oats due to his play last game? Of course we shouldn't lynch Oats for his play last game. But I would disagree on the scum motivation part. It makes no sense from either alignment because you'll be outcast for wanting to do it in the first place. Either way, the fact that you jumped on the joke idea made me lol on the inside.  | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On December 04 2012 10:29 Rad wrote: @yamato I'll answer your #3 because it is so relevant: cheesecake of course (of the Mr. variety) Now on to CC's questions... =P 1. I've played 2 games of mafia, NMM XXVIII and XXX, town in both. First was vig, second vt. I obs'd a good amount of chrono until it became overwhelming (think I got 140 pages in then my head exploded) and all of last NMM, and some of paranoid. Played a lot of sc2mafia the past week or two which probably translates to shit for TL mafia skills, but we'll see. 2. No idea cheese, I feel like that scenario would have to be played out however it should be at the time. I can't see myself leaning one way or the other 100% of the time =/ Probably lean towards lurker lynch I guess? minor-moderate is going to be pretty subjective... 3. Green. I'll let you figure out why (spoiler: it's cause I'm a genius). "I have no idea who to lynch, but I can justify it because of this post!" On December 04 2012 11:16 Rad wrote: @kick sorry missed the jkjk =/ I'm quick to jump on shit ideas ^^ Townies don't jump on shit ideas. We jump on scum ideas. Shit ideas can come from either faction. On December 04 2012 11:36 Rad wrote: Yes, lynching someone strictly based on their play in a previous game seems stupid. Town wants to lynch scum, not shoot in the dark and hope. Scum wants to do stupid shit like lynch the easy target. Do you read that idea differently? Would you be ok with the idea of lynching oats due to his play last game? Rhetorical question pretty much. What's the purpose in asking this? On December 04 2012 12:59 Rad wrote: I think he goes red with anger easily and if town, confirmation bias will kill his ability to reason. However, his actions are pushing for conversation and that's a good thing (especially at the beginning). If axle feels pressured to talk more, great, and if he doesn't, we can read the situation based on that. I don't really like how you stopped it early on though. Would you prefer yamato ask a question, get ignored, and drop it? Another useless, rhetorical question. I read this post as "Why aren't you guys bickering at each other more?" @Rad, jiodboy, scylencia What are your thoughts on the game so far? Scumreads? | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On December 05 2012 01:29 Oatsmaster wrote: Kickstart is scummy. Last game, we lynched lurkers and it didnt go too well, vets posted and said that its unlikely that a scum is a lurker and STILL Kickstart posts this. It reads as very wishy, washy allowing him to keep all his options open. Lynching a lurker is good for scum because it doesnt really show strong opinions either way because its a lurker, coinflippy. This vote is so bad, no explaination why this is scum.. Kickstart is looking for town support here, he doesnt want to vote yamato if no one else votes for him... His whole case on yamato is just him jumping on a small thing that he doesnt even explain how it is scum aligned or even aligned at all. ##Vote: Kickstart "Kickstart is bad, I'll vote for him." I see no motivation for scum here. How is Kickstart pushing a scum agenda? And that's not a vote. It's a FoS. | ||
| ||
