EPTI have 3 games already. Is it ok to subscribe both here and in another game at the same time ?
Newbie Mini Mafia XXX
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
I have 3 games already. Is it ok to subscribe both here and in another game at the same time ? | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
| ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
On November 02 2012 11:45 marvellosity wrote: I'd rather you played one game at a time. I think this game is going to fill up way faster that Sandy game. I guess I should be fine. Also I would like to thank you guys to call me a retard in the previous scumQT  My case against dandel was spot on but nobody took the time to read it. | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
| ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
##Vote: Alsn | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
Whatever read I have on you, I shall conclude with the opposite  | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
| ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
| ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
| ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
| ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
This is all because of you thrawn by the way  | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
With the player list that we have, I don't think we to need to use an anti-lurker policy this time. Nevertheless, the last game is still a great trauma for me, so I'm going to get a little wary if your expected activity level is not matched. Regarding last game, I think we made a poor use of the plurality lynch system. I started an argument with sylver about this the last game and he shut me down because he thought I was mafia. [QUOTE]On October 26 2012 22:56 Djodref wrote: [QUOTE]On October 26 2012 22:47 Dandel Ion wrote: //snip We have plurality lynch system, so we don't need to consolidate, and I have no idea how many people are actually going to vote today... Could you tell us more about why you want to lynch Ini ?[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]On October 26 2012 23:05 sylverfyre wrote: /snip Finally just now claiming "not needing to consolidate" is fishy to me too. If we don't consolidate, we're going to have someone get lynched with like 3 votes, reducing scum's need to assist in the lynchwagon as well as improving scum ability to make sure one of their own cannot be lynched - so we're less likely to find scum today, but equally importantly, we would have less information later in the game (and could cause town to go rabid on itself) We want to consolidate. /snip[/QUOTE] I think we should avoid to reduce the possibility for the lynch to only 2 players like we did in D1 last game. Everybody votes for his top scumread and the guys with the more votes gets lynched... At this point, I think we should argue who is the best to lynch or why we shouldn't lynch this one or this one among 3 or 4 players and not only 2. It creates more discussion than a faked majority lynch. | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
Sorry for the morning quote failure. | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
-Newbie Mini Mafia XXVIII as Cop -Looney Lynching Mini Mafia as mafia pardoner -Newbie Mini Mafia XXIX as VT @ Rad The only potential lurkers that we have in this game are daoud and maybe Obzy (but it doesn't look like it). My problem with your policy is that it is directed towards these players in this game. What we have to be wary of is active lurking (refer to the mafiaQT in the previous game) and people blending in. Do you see anyone else possibly lurking ? | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
I don't think this one deserves a FoS. When Alsn says that it is technically a lie, that's just Alsn arguing about math and logic. @ everyone I'm going to be around at deadline but it is 10am for me so please expect me to take some time to catch up with the thread and not being able to think very clearly. I was seriously pissed off last game when you were jumping at me for my waking-up posts. | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
That's my problem with a lurker policy this game, I think that it can be used only against daoud or Obzy (maybe sylverfire). I think it would be much better to call directly these players for lurking rather agreeing on a policy which could be a perfect excuse for the mafia to push a mislynch on them, assuming that they are town. It's a small game and if you have a problem with the activity level of anyone, you can call them on it, no need for a policy. | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
On November 03 2012 11:07 debears wrote: @djo Why are you addressing lurker policy still while me and alsn are arguing? Afraid to jump in and actually talk about something that doesnt make you commit? @ debears Your statement was incorrect, Alsn called you for it. Your FoS was a bit overreacting in my opinion. I didn't like him using the red font neither but he has his reasons for it. Last game was horrible for us. | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
On November 03 2012 11:12 Rad wrote: @Djo If no one lurks, the lurker policy has done its job. That's all it's there to do, stop people from lurking. Nothing more, nothing less. Let's move on shall we? The policy prevents mafia players from lurking but it doesn't stop anyone from being inactive. And the policy is the best excuse ever for mafia to lynch an inactive town player with IRL issues. This game is full of active players and small enough to call directly a player on active lurking, blending in or pure lurking. I don't think we need the policy and I'm going to get very suspicious on players lynching according to the policy only. | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
On November 03 2012 10:11 Clarity_nl wrote: Hopefully we won't have to deal with lurkers altogether, but yes. A roco or inig lynch instead of a daoud lynch would've been much better for us. So yeah, information is good which means we want people talking which means policy lynch on lurkers is a good thing unless we have an exceptional read on someone. But I wouldn't enforce any policy other than that. I will be here and active before every lynch. @ Clarity What other policies did you have in mind ? | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
I think I'm making a good point and I'm feeling like you are trying to shush me. But I would agree that it's not good to spend to much time discussing it too much. What else do you want to talk about ? | ||
| ||
