• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:20
CEST 16:20
KST 23:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week2[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation14$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China10Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL68
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Season 1 - Final Week Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL BW General Discussion Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [G] Progamer Settings
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 628 users

[M] (4) TPW Hunting Grounds

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
1 2 3 Next All
lefix
Profile Joined February 2011
Germany1082 Posts
October 05 2012 09:58 GMT
#1
[image loading]

TPW Hunting Grounds
by lefix
Map Size: 158x158
Tileset: Bel'shir
Spawns: 4
Bases: 16
Published: NA/EU

About:
Sharing some thoughts on this maps, other than that I love space platforms:
I haven't really done any 4p maps in a long time. It's just so much easier to make a good 2p map than a good 4p map. But you got to step out of your comfort zone every once in a while, right?
I was aiming for a layout where expansions were evenly spread out on the map, as opposed to all lining up along the map borders. I tried to provide an attractive expansion pattern in both directions (CW and CCW) after taking the first 3 bases.Overall I personally think the map flows very nicely.
There's Xel'Naga Towers that give you good vision of the center area of the map (the shortest attack path leads through the center), while not giving actual vision of the center bases.
Obviously, in close positions, there's some little advantages and disadvantages to each side, which I tried to even out as best as I could. So far I have gotten very positive feedback. It will require some more testing of course.

Screenshots:
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
Map of the Month | The Planetary Workshop | SC2Melee.net
See.Blue
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
United States2673 Posts
October 05 2012 10:54 GMT
#2
Gorgeous and love the idea behind.
lefix
Profile Joined February 2011
Germany1082 Posts
October 05 2012 11:34 GMT
#3
here's a quick walloff example as some people thought the nat choke was too wide
http://i.imgur.com/PNHhq.jpg
Map of the Month | The Planetary Workshop | SC2Melee.net
ZeroStarCraft2
Profile Joined March 2012
Malaysia154 Posts
October 05 2012 11:37 GMT
#4
First look and all I saw was Tal'Darim Altar. Then I looked closer...
Looks good, though it's funny to see a dirt platform floating in space...
The centre looks like a nightmare for zerg with all the chokes and high ground. I'm probably wrong though.
Squirtle, PartinG fighting!
Qikz
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United Kingdom12022 Posts
October 05 2012 12:12 GMT
#5
Looks awesome. The third and fourth are not immediately next to each other so you've promoted army movement and the center is chokey enough, but with enough routes to run around and flank to make it balanced.

Will certainly look forward to playing this.
FanTaSy's #1 Fan | STPL Caster/Organiser | SKT BEST KT | https://twitch.tv/stpl
Feldo
Profile Joined June 2012
Netherlands1 Post
October 05 2012 12:18 GMT
#6
Looks good man, like the relativity easy third.
Babru
Profile Joined September 2010
196 Posts
October 05 2012 12:36 GMT
#7
Looks really good. You might want to consider cross only spawns though.
Kaelaris
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United Kingdom788 Posts
October 05 2012 13:26 GMT
#8
On October 05 2012 21:36 Babru wrote:
Looks really good. You might want to consider cross only spawns though.


I would concur. Cross Positions only imo is the way to go. Rotational symetry allows for advantages that should just not be there in an RNG sense if close spawns occur.
CommentatorESL Commentator ♞ Facebook.com/Kaelaris ♞ Twitter.com/Kaelaris ♞ Youtube.com/Kaelaris ♞ Twitch.tv/Kaelaris
Prog
Profile Joined December 2009
United Kingdom1470 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-05 13:43:56
October 05 2012 13:42 GMT
#9
I disagree. While it is certainly true, that rotational symetry allows for some imbalances, it really destroys the whole purpose of 4 player maps and turns them into just bigger 2 player maps. If the positional advantages are very small, the different kinds of playstyle from genuine 4 player maps outweight them in my opinion. It just provides more variance in playstyle with all possible spawns.

So the better way in my opinion is to create genuine 4 player maps with as small of rotational advantages as possible, not design pseudo 4 player maps. I think this map looks promising in that regard.
Sated
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
England4983 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-05 13:52:16
October 05 2012 13:52 GMT
#10
--- Nuked ---
Aunvilgod
Profile Joined December 2011
2653 Posts
October 05 2012 13:59 GMT
#11
Generally this map is very similar to a 4-player version of CK, not bad. 4-player maps suck though.

Your aesthetics are very well done but I think the color-scheme sucks.
ilovegroov | Blizzards mapmaker(s?) suck ass | #1 Protoss hater
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
October 05 2012 14:37 GMT
#12
On October 05 2012 22:26 mouzKaelaris wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 05 2012 21:36 Babru wrote:
Looks really good. You might want to consider cross only spawns though.


I would concur. Cross Positions only imo is the way to go. Rotational symetry allows for advantages that should just not be there in an RNG sense if close spawns occur.


Thanks for commenting Kaelaris, it's great to have some of the SC2 personalities taking an interest, however small, in the map making process.

4p maps are a tricky one. IMO 4p rotational maps should never be cross only, if they are forced cross then they may as well be 2p maps. But then you have the problem that if you don't want slight asymmetries then the entire map pool will be 2p maps with maybe a 4p mirror with close spawns disabled. Personally I don't mind slight asymmetries as long as there are no big advantages for certain spawns, in the same way that the 3 races have differences but they all even out. I would like to get more player's views on this though.

I can't spot any obvious advantages in close spawns except for potentially the 3rd, and that's one of those things that is difficult to tell without a lot of play data. Overall, it's a really solid map, good job! The only thing that I feel is slightly lacking is in the aesthetics which seem like your standard grassy jungle affair, albeit on a floating platform in space! Something a bit more unique would be cool
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
Aunvilgod
Profile Joined December 2011
2653 Posts
October 05 2012 14:51 GMT
#13
On October 05 2012 23:37 OxyGenesis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 05 2012 22:26 mouzKaelaris wrote:
On October 05 2012 21:36 Babru wrote:
Looks really good. You might want to consider cross only spawns though.


I would concur. Cross Positions only imo is the way to go. Rotational symetry allows for advantages that should just not be there in an RNG sense if close spawns occur.


Thanks for commenting Kaelaris, it's great to have some of the SC2 personalities taking an interest, however small, in the map making process.

4p maps are a tricky one. IMO 4p rotational maps should never be cross only, if they are forced cross then they may as well be 2p maps. But then you have the problem that if you don't want slight asymmetries then the entire map pool will be 2p maps with maybe a 4p mirror with close spawns disabled. Personally I don't mind slight asymmetries as long as there are no big advantages for certain spawns, in the same way that the 3 races have differences but they all even out. I would like to get more player's views on this though.

I can't spot any obvious advantages in close spawns except for potentially the 3rd, and that's one of those things that is difficult to tell without a lot of play data. Overall, it's a really solid map, good job! The only thing that I feel is slightly lacking is in the aesthetics which seem like your standard grassy jungle affair, albeit on a floating platform in space! Something a bit more unique would be cool


Of course it is pretty hard to tell what will happen without game-data but that there WILL be imbalances is extremely likely.

However BW did not die due to map imbalance. One of the problems might be the fact that SC2 players don´t adapt at all to a map.
ilovegroov | Blizzards mapmaker(s?) suck ass | #1 Protoss hater
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
October 05 2012 15:22 GMT
#14
On October 05 2012 23:51 Aunvilgod wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 05 2012 23:37 OxyGenesis wrote:
On October 05 2012 22:26 mouzKaelaris wrote:
On October 05 2012 21:36 Babru wrote:
Looks really good. You might want to consider cross only spawns though.


I would concur. Cross Positions only imo is the way to go. Rotational symetry allows for advantages that should just not be there in an RNG sense if close spawns occur.


Thanks for commenting Kaelaris, it's great to have some of the SC2 personalities taking an interest, however small, in the map making process.

4p maps are a tricky one. IMO 4p rotational maps should never be cross only, if they are forced cross then they may as well be 2p maps. But then you have the problem that if you don't want slight asymmetries then the entire map pool will be 2p maps with maybe a 4p mirror with close spawns disabled. Personally I don't mind slight asymmetries as long as there are no big advantages for certain spawns, in the same way that the 3 races have differences but they all even out. I would like to get more player's views on this though.

I can't spot any obvious advantages in close spawns except for potentially the 3rd, and that's one of those things that is difficult to tell without a lot of play data. Overall, it's a really solid map, good job! The only thing that I feel is slightly lacking is in the aesthetics which seem like your standard grassy jungle affair, albeit on a floating platform in space! Something a bit more unique would be cool


Of course it is pretty hard to tell what will happen without game-data but that there WILL be imbalances is extremely likely.

However BW did not die due to map imbalance. One of the problems might be the fact that SC2 players don´t adapt at all to a map.


I think we are at a point now where we can spot the exploitable things in close spawns like the nat cliffs on Tal'Darim or the 3rds on Antiga, the question is are there other imbalances that we won't spot until a map gets played a lot? Even in symmetrical maps you get map features that favour specific races, the centre bases on cross-only Antiga favour terran for instance, yet the map as a whole still seems pretty balanced. When you have an asymmetrical map such as close spawns you balance it exactly the same way, you just have the 3 mirror matchups to worry about as well. The problem with 4p rotational maps is that you are much more limited in the changes that you can make to balance them. I don't think that asymmetrical maps are inherently flawed though, as the whole game is slightly asymmetrical, they are just harder to balance. I enjoy the challenge
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
October 05 2012 17:04 GMT
#15
This is basically what Burning Altar should have been.

Ah yeah 158x158, extra space gettin the job done.

Best part about this map: center bases that aren't revealed by towers or too close together.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Samro225am
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany982 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-05 17:26:34
October 05 2012 17:13 GMT
#16
On October 06 2012 02:04 EatThePath wrote:
This is basically what Burning Altar should have been.

Ah yeah 158x158, extra space gettin the job done.

Best part about this map: center bases that aren't revealed by towers or too close together.


you think i missed to add 4 bases? :D


edit: forgot something.

asking 4p rotational being cross spawn only is like saying there should no be any 2p maps because of steppes of war. sorry for being harsh.. if your point was true, why should one bother doing 4p maps at all when you can do many more interesting things on 2p maps cause more bases are more divers? cross only is no alternative, only a way to fix broken maps.

there are two actual problems in 4p rotational when design is flawed: rush distances n2n being too short or long and fourth being to easy to decline from the middle while getting towards maxed.

i'd understand complains that it is to easy to control all towers, once ahead. comeback are difficult and fourth bases are then taken away easily.

EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
October 05 2012 17:15 GMT
#17
On October 06 2012 02:13 Samro225am wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 06 2012 02:04 EatThePath wrote:
This is basically what Burning Altar should have been.

Ah yeah 158x158, extra space gettin the job done.

Best part about this map: center bases that aren't revealed by towers or too close together.


you think i missed to add 4 bases? :D

It was another era. We were just kids back then. XD
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
iamcaustic
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada1509 Posts
October 05 2012 17:16 GMT
#18
On October 05 2012 22:26 mouzKaelaris wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 05 2012 21:36 Babru wrote:
Looks really good. You might want to consider cross only spawns though.


I would concur. Cross Positions only imo is the way to go. Rotational symetry allows for advantages that should just not be there in an RNG sense if close spawns occur.

Why on earth would this map need to be cross-position only? I get the idea of making general statements that end up being fairly accurate in terms of 4p SC2 maps we've seen in the past, but at the end of the day the act of disabling certain spawns should always be done on a case-by-case basis. What you're essentially asking is for there to be no 4p maps, only 2p maps with some of them switching the angle between top-left/bottom-right and top-right/bottom-left every now and again.

It's not like BW maps were magically free of these supposed "positional advantages", but that players adapted to the map and specific spawns. That's a key part of the game and what helps keep a map fresh and exciting. Sure, a map like Antiga Shipyard has some pretty big imbalances due to its design -- which forces it to be cross-spawn to simply be playable in a tournament format -- but I haven't really heard a compelling reason as to why this map should be subject to the same kind of patchwork fix.
Twitter: @iamcaustic
Ragoo
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany2773 Posts
October 05 2012 17:36 GMT
#19
On October 05 2012 22:26 mouzKaelaris wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 05 2012 21:36 Babru wrote:
Looks really good. You might want to consider cross only spawns though.


I would concur. Cross Positions only imo is the way to go. Rotational symetry allows for advantages that should just not be there in an RNG sense if close spawns occur.


Well if you make a 4p rotational and you then make it cross only, you essentially just made a 2p map. Except it's not a good 2p map since you worked with the restrictions of a 4p map for a 2p map.
What I want to say is, the idea of making 4p rotation maps cross only is utterly retarded as a concept.

Asymmetry isn't as bad as people make it out to be. You want to avoid it yes, and so we do in 2p maps since its avoidable.
But you can work around asymmetry and you can work with asymmetry. It is simply harder to balance, yet you can have a lot of fun with it by giving different advantages and disadvantages. SC 2 is a game of asymmetry anyway, since races are asymmetric.
Also as well as slight asymmetry, slight imbalance isn't horrible. If you want to have a constantly changing map pool with fresh and new ideas you will always have the danger of maps being slightly imbalanced. Well, just try to fix it or simply remove them then and move on.

BW had many maps that were slightly imbalanced, many maps that were 3p or 4p and also many maps that just had unnecessary asymmetry.
Did it destroy BW? No, quite the opposite.
Constantly playing new maps with new ideas was one of the reasons why the game could be interesting for such a long time.
Member of TPW mapmaking team/// twitter.com/Ragoo_ /// "goody represents border between explainable reason and supernatural" Cloud
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-05 17:40:18
October 05 2012 17:38 GMT
#20
On October 06 2012 02:16 iamcaustic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 05 2012 22:26 mouzKaelaris wrote:
On October 05 2012 21:36 Babru wrote:
Looks really good. You might want to consider cross only spawns though.


I would concur. Cross Positions only imo is the way to go. Rotational symetry allows for advantages that should just not be there in an RNG sense if close spawns occur.

Why on earth would this map need to be cross-position only? I get the idea of making general statements that end up being fairly accurate in terms of 4p SC2 maps we've seen in the past, but at the end of the day the act of disabling certain spawns should always be done on a case-by-case basis. What you're essentially asking is for there to be no 4p maps, only 2p maps with some of them switching the angle between top-left/bottom-right and top-right/bottom-left every now and again.

It's not like BW maps were magically free of these supposed "positional advantages", but that players adapted to the map and specific spawns. That's a key part of the game and what helps keep a map fresh and exciting. Sure, a map like Antiga Shipyard has some pretty big imbalances due to its design -- which forces it to be cross-spawn to simply be playable in a tournament format -- but I haven't really heard a compelling reason as to why this map should be subject to the same kind of patchwork fix.

Antiga cross spawn is more like a band-aid than a fix anyway. It's not really a good way to rectify an inherently bad map. Which this is not.

Positional balance should only be considered for mirror matchups since the other matchups are by definition asymmetric anyway. Here the only potential problem may be the vulnerability of the cw spawn to tank elevator play at the natural, which shouldn't be gamebreaking.

While cw has to take the natural "towards" the opponent, it also has a much easier tower that actually watches the attack paths.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
13:00
King of the Hill #217
davetesta56
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Reynor 489
Lowko401
SC2Nice 75
trigger 27
StarCraft: Brood War
Jaedong 1336
EffOrt 960
firebathero 624
Stork 465
Mini 457
Nal_rA 308
Snow 220
hero 161
ToSsGirL 142
Rush 134
[ Show more ]
Backho 133
Pusan 131
Zeus 125
Mind 125
Hyun 74
Sea.KH 61
sSak 59
Sharp 56
soO 50
JYJ48
sas.Sziky 47
HiyA 38
JulyZerg 35
Shinee 30
Aegong 27
sorry 26
yabsab 23
ajuk12(nOOB) 15
zelot 13
Movie 12
IntoTheRainbow 10
Terrorterran 6
Hm[arnc] 5
SilentControl 4
Rock 4
Dota 2
Gorgc9235
qojqva1973
syndereN327
XcaliburYe270
febbydoto8
Counter-Strike
flusha380
Foxcn157
markeloff104
chrisJcsgo46
Heroes of the Storm
XaKoH 188
Khaldor179
Other Games
tarik_tv26379
B2W.Neo1653
shahzam679
crisheroes644
DeMusliM514
Fuzer 313
RotterdaM190
Pyrionflax169
Hui .118
ArmadaUGS70
QueenE47
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick36919
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 7
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 21
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2997
League of Legends
• Nemesis5942
• TFBlade670
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
9h 40m
RSL Revival
19h 40m
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 1h
OSC
1d 5h
RSL Revival
1d 19h
SHIN vs Clem
FEL
1d 21h
FEL
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
NC Random Cup

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.