Normal Mini Mafia II

On July 02 2012 06:05 marvellosity wrote:
VE <33333

On July 03 2012 05:03 MsZontar wrote:
/in

On July 03 2012 11:10 drwiggl3s wrote:


:D

drwiggles was just temp banned for 2 days by Manifesto7.

That account was created on 2011-04-08 12:36:54 and had 15 posts.

Reason: No picture in the picture thrad. Our thrread warnings arent bullshit.

Banned whileni eat dinner.

On July 06 2012 11:27 Zephirdd wrote:
My opinion is that going "besides everyone's usual fill of Policy Lynch is bad" is cutting on the discussion and reducing the potential subjects for dicussing, thus reducing the potential to scumhunting. Who wants to avoid scumhunters? scum.

Bluelightz, you're scum?

On July 06 2012 11:30 Bluelightz wrote:


It's just from my expierience that when someone start's a discussion about policy lynches everyone always think it's bad so therefore I just cut to the chase and get started with scum hunting.

On July 06 2012 11:32 Zephirdd wrote:
you're not cutting to the chase, having that part of the discussion is great. Even if people agree, the way they do it is what matters.

However, if they don't even need to do it, we wouldn't find their "way" and we wouldn't have useful information for scumhunting in the first place.

On July 06 2012 11:37 Bluelightz wrote:


If using Policy lynches for scumhunting is their way, well, that's how they scum hunt,is it important that we know "their" way of scumhunting? Explain the bolded part please, I don't see how having that part of the discussion is great.

My opinions on that Policy Lynch Discussion:
1. That it waste's time that could be used for scum hunting.
2. That from countless games everyone will probably say "Lynch All Liars sucks, Lynch All Lurkers for day 1!" (but if someone has a opinions on LaLiars or LaLurkers please share it)

On July 06 2012 11:55 Dangeresque77 wrote:
Yea I agree.

If we dont find something to talk about then we won't find out Whoes scum.
Policies for lynching is as good a topic as any

On July 06 2012 12:10 Dangeresque77 wrote:




Basically I just say all that lynch all liers lynch all lurkers etc.

But yea it's sircumstantual, I mean im not gonna just condem someone just because he breaks a rule period.

On July 06 2012 12:51 Dangeresque77 wrote:


As response to your first question on me. I don't know what to tell you. I figure that lynching policy is just a good conversation starter. It gets people talking and it helps scum hunt


In response to the second. what I ment was that I believe that we can't just kill someone without stopping to think about it first if he broke a policy.
99 percent of the time I'll be for it but I like to think about it a little bit before I just vote lynch

On July 06 2012 17:49 NoSmurfHere wrote:
sup guys I'm vanilla town

I go sleep now

On July 06 2012 20:06 Bluelightz wrote:


What the hell? What are you doing? trying to shit up town discussion? tell me a good reason why are you doing this please, I don't know why anyone should claim (except if their name is Kenpachi).

On July 07 2012 08:46 Bluelightz wrote:
[b]prplhz[b]

Let's see, he opens this game with this post:



A vote with no reason which is explained with a reason that

On July 07 2012 08:48 drwiggl3s wrote:
I don't think dangeresque is being weird. I think slOosh gave good reason after his initial post and "ninja vote". I am suspicious of sinensis. MsZontar's actions don't seem out of the ordinary to me. I'd attack you to if I didn't just get out of a game with you where you were playing just like this (but were town). And yes I also think prplhz behavior is scummy.

Is any of this enough for a lynch? yes. Is any of it good enough for a sure fire mafia lynch? no. So i want others to talk.

On July 06 2012 22:23 prplhz wrote:
when it comes to sloosh my bullshit tolerance level is pretty low

marv ignoring me because scum

On July 07 2012 08:52 drwiggl3s wrote:
Is any of this enough for a lynch? yes. Is any of it good enough for a sure fire mafia lynch? no. So i want others to talk.

I don't want to throw blame around on behalf of weak cases when I'm actually waiting to see more. I was just stating my opinions so far on what's happened D1.

On July 07 2012 08:48 drwiggl3s wrote:
I don't think dangeresque is being weird. I think slOosh gave good reason after his initial post and "ninja vote". I am suspicious of sinensis. MsZontar's actions don't seem out of the ordinary to me. I'd attack you to if I didn't just get out of a game with you where you were playing just like this (but were town). And yes I also think prplhz behavior is scummy.

Is any of this enough for a lynch? yes. Is any of it good enough for a sure fire mafia lynch? no. So i want others to talk.