EPTTL Mafia LVI
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
| ||
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
On June 30 2012 11:28 NoSmurfHere wrote: I'm not kidding, my role PM is like "you're a Role Name.". Let's kill this guy: ##vote mKmKmK My role PM also said I'm a "Role Name". So NoSmurfHere is definitely town in my books. | ||
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
| ||
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
I agree that BKEXE's initial posts were a tad scummy. But what gave it away to me was that after casualman voted for him, both Mattchew and BKEXE immediately returned the favour and voted for casualman to be lynched. Both without any explanation other than saying "Wtf is this". And then later, both went MIA for quite a while instead of explaining their votes or trying to defend BKEXE. You may ask why would casualman throw his vote at BKEXE so early. It could be he is either just noob, or it could be he read BKEXE as scum (like many people are now) but just before a lot of people had the chance to. As for other players: I find many people are soft defending BKEXE and in their posts trying to put suspicion onto others (with little reason). I see these as scummy moves. | ||
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
BKExe gained first suspicions. Votes were put on him. His posting increased at a rapid rate where he wasn't so much as defending himself as he was putting suspicion on others. There was also a increase of posting by a few others who were soft defending him while pointing fingers at others. mkmkmk get read as scum by numerous people. All while being pretty much just missing in action. Votes are pushed to him as an easy D1 lynch. Somehow (I have no clue how his posts were read as scum), people hint and drop Fox's name as a possible scum candidate. After testing the waters, a bandwagon is launched on him and it get's the votes. This lynch not only killed a fellow town, but it also netted 0 information on who else could be scum. I'd like to throw suspicion on those who are actively throwing suspicion onto others. As the people they are reading as scum are giving me no sense of scumminess at all. While the people who do appear scummy seem to have a team of like minded individuals backing up their claims and dismissing others. For the love of town, if you're town, don't settle for these mislynches. If we were going to lynch someone, it should have been someone that actually had people defending them. At least this way their death (in vain or not) would give us some valuable information on the people posting in this thread. Any lynch that doesn't support this idea, is a lynch that is proposed by the mafia, and we should look to those who propose it as our next targets. | ||
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
PS. @ Mattchew Foxtrot by all means did NOT deserve the noose he got. He posted late, and said sorry for being busy. Is that an obvious "scum post"? Yes. So obvious that any scum with any sense would NOT post it. Any read on him being scum tells more about the person pointing fingers than it does on Foxtrot himself. Also, why should we noose twelve next? Did he push the bandwagon any more than you when it came to Foxtrot? No. Do you simply want to noose him or discredit him because he made some very good arguments in the past against you and towards the idea that BKEXE is scum? I'll let my fellow town member answer that last one themselves. | ||
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
The only justification I can think of for the Foxtrotter wagon, was that there was a tie between BroodKingExe, Foxtrotter, and mkmkmk. Since they couldn't push enough votes onto mkmkmk to ensure BroodKingexe wouldn't get ninja lynched by some last minute votes, they sprung a new bandwagon on Foxtrotter. I do agree with Bill Murray in that some people who pushed for the Foxtrotter wagon need to be lynched. Although I'm curious as to who he thinks would be a good target. To me, the best target is already apparent. But since I have no good town read or scum read on Bill, I'd like to hear what he thinks. | ||
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
See how it excludes BKexe for example? | ||
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
If he's scum, everyone on that list is town. And we have 5 (6th person would have been foxtrott) people who can be labelled confirm town for the rest of the game. | ||
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
And yes mkmkmk was in the lead but that was only at vote count. Prior to one of the vote counts someone mentioned it was 7/7/7 (mkmkmk, bkexe, foxtrott). Leaving it as anyone's game to determine who would be lynched. And if one of those 3 are Mafia, than that's something to spur some last minute vote changes and bandwagoning. I'd like to lynch whoever will give us the most information next. If you disagree with this, or see someone as SOOO scummy that it would be more beneficial to lynch them, than please feel free to try to dissuade me. | ||
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
On July 02 2012 17:55 kingdedede wrote: Even if Mattchew is scum you're horribly wrong. Want to see how pro Mattchew is at bussing his teammates? Go look at holy roman. Every single one of his lynch targets was scum with him. I don't believe in taking peoples past actions and using them as some sort of meta in this game. Chances are if he made mistakes in previous games, he'd correct them in this one. If he made good memorable plays in other games, he'd use them to trick people into believing him this game. There's 26 people left in this game. If we can't lynch a red (we can't.. he's gotta be a half lurker at this point), we lynch who gives us the most information. | ||
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
@ ET. Can you please add something constructive to our discussion here? | ||
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
If your town, please post and discuss this with us. Else this is just going to be washed out by all the Mafia's random finger pointing / speculating / useless crap posts. | ||
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
| ||
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
| ||
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
If we lynch Mattchew, it will give us the most possible information that a lynch can give us. That's the point I'm making here. | ||
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
@ Acrofales, I have no clue how you can say ET Is making sense here. All he's doing is trying to shut down our suspicions, and here you are trying to branch onto a completely different topic. | ||
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
I'm done here for now. If your town, please read and consider my posts. | ||
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
1. He WAS a driving factor behind the Fox lynch. Him putting Fox on his list spurred the push to have Fox lynched. 2. This is possible, but if he was scum before, and made a list before, don't you read his making a list again as a possible tell that he could be scum again? Do you not agree that lynching him would give us the most information possible? and would be a good lynch, despite how strong your "reads" may feel to you? 3. The case on him, is that he was defended, softly, by a few people when he was put in hot water. Where as mkmkmk and FT (confirmed town now) were both not defended at all, yet had people bandwaggoning them like crazy (the same people who soft defended bkexe). | ||
|
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
In this thread, mafia supporting mafia in misguiding train of thought that will lead to lynching mafia. | ||
| ||
