Trying to get the attention off you by using a personal insult about the first game I ever played seems a bit shit, you got anything to say about the actual case I made, instead of about me?

Show nested quote +

And yeah, right off the bat on that game, he voted on some random guy, followed by being called out by someone as scum, then proceeded to WAY overreact in the guise of being "Afraid of death"

Obviously, now he's tried to run away in the face of being called out, his replacement will have to convince us he isn't mafia.

A couple of things about this post and in general.

Firstly I will not be held responsible for Acro's posting, deal with it. I will be held responsible for my own. I replaced into SNMM XI and said this, and I was townie:

On May 01 2012 07:02 marvellosity wrote:

Second of all, I am not AcesAnoka. You may think his posting is terrible as hell or that he was scummy and lurky or whatever, but please approach my posting with an open mind. If you're gonna call me scum, call me scum because of what I've done.

Secondly, your post I quoted. Were you seriously having a go at Acro for insulting you for your first game played, when your entire case on him rests on his scum-play on the first game he played?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2012 14:00 GMT

#120

Read through the filters, and I know it's early but good god is it lurker central atm. One thing that caught my eye is the following

On May 21 2012 07:36 Navillus wrote:
Does it matter?

No but seriously I'd say it's generally advice, I'm not sure that I agree on the DT advice but then if all the other stuff is him actually trying to help that probably is too and I'd defer to his judgement on that over my own.

Navillus places a dumbly explained vote on wbg, and the justification is that... the advice was helpful and good? Something doesn't add up here.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2012 14:32 GMT

#123

You're such a darling.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2012 14:34 GMT

#124

The point, Zealos, is that whether it was addressed as an insult or not, Acro said your scumreads were bad that game. I am going to presume he is telling the truth, or you would have corrected me.

You cry "but it was my first game douchebag!" before using Acro's first game as the basis for your case.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2012 15:23 GMT

#128

Anyway, anyone agree with my point on Navillus that got buried at the bottom of the last page?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2012 15:38 GMT

#132

The irony of Navillus' post on the matter being dodgy is that I do agree wbg's post was dodgy in itself. Who is wbg giving advice to here? This is not a newbie game.

+ Show Spoiler +

On May 21 2012 05:03 wherebugsgo wrote:
Cool.

A few notes I want to share with everyone:

1. Please don't lurk.
2. With that said, please don't spam either; if we have like 50 pages by the end of d1 it'll probably be looking really good for mafia.
3. If you are a blue role: don't breadcrumbyour role; you may choose to breadcrumb your actions, as that is more useful (and much harder to fake for scum). Don't play diffferently simply because you have a power role; scum will notice.
4. DTs: choose players who are unlikely to be framed or shot n1. Choose players who you think will live for a while.
5. Medics/JK: don't bluehunt, just protect the most sensible townies.
6. Vigis: don't be MrZentor (case in point: Game of Thrones)
7. Veterans: please don't do stupid shit to try to ensure you get shot. Chances are far stronger you'll be lynched for being a moron than take a bullet from scum.

Anyway, all general advice and all stuff most of you should know, but read it over anyway.

On May 21 2012 05:03 wherebugsgo wrote:

Show nested quote +

I don't support policy lynching but I do agree we should keep an eye on VE because his play can be quite erratic. If he's the focus of attention as either alignment it becomes very difficult to discern what he is. So for now I think we should look elsewhere so we don't have that problem, and let VE decide for himself what he wants to do.

This paragraph says remarkably little. He's talking about VE but what does any of it actually mean? The two bold parts are somewhat contradictory as well.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2012 15:44 GMT

#133

Hiro: I can't say it's tingling my spidey senses at the moment.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2012 17:46 GMT

#137

I don't think I'd agree to a Nova lynch unless something very particular came up. Atm he's playing to his not-very-useful town meta rather than his post-extensively scum meta

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2012 19:41 GMT

#153

I'm totally up for lynching Mattchew because it seems like he's gonna post like a dick.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2012 20:07 GMT

#167

Do you know what omgus means?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2012 20:20 GMT

#175

On May 22 2012 05:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
'chew you're meta-defending I guess? You're not alone, marvel lacks spine as well.

Hey. Hey! Watch your mouth.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2012 21:03 GMT

#197

##Vote: Mattchew

I just can't bear it.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2012 21:03 GMT

#199

To be clear: this is absolutely a policy lynch.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2012 21:30 GMT

#206

Holy moly I have two votes

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2012 21:36 GMT

#208

You're right, I don't, Zealos unvoted me.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2012 22:27 GMT

#213

Guys. Look at Nova's filter in LIV where he was also town (and where I won on your behalf, Katina dearest). Very similar. Not convinced by his lynch at all.