EPT/in
TL Mafia LIV
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
/in | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
:3 | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
:3 | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
- D | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
Everyone is doing that. - D | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
On May 04 2012 02:47 DoYouHas wrote: Palmar's confrontational and empty 1 liners make it impossible to get a read on him. (anti-town) He is shutting down conversation instead of fostering it. (anti-town) I have no interest in keeping someone around who I won't be able to get a handle on and who I think is hurting the town. ##Vote: Palmar What? You're voting for someone because you're not good enough to work out his alignment? :3 | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
:3 | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
On May 04 2012 03:01 marvellosity wrote: That's not what he said, why wilfully represent his post? I also read it as hassy stated and as someone who also has a chaotic posting style there is generally at least 1 scum on these easy "anti town" lynches just trying to slip in and look useless. -D | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
:3 | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
On May 04 2012 03:30 DoYouHas wrote: Oh, and btw. You are defending Palmar by attacking the person going after him. You discredit me and Palmar no longer has a need to respond. This is wrong - D | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
On May 04 2012 02:47 DoYouHas wrote: Palmar's confrontational and empty 1 liners make it impossible to get a read on him. (anti-town) He is shutting down conversation instead of fostering it. (anti-town) I have no interest in keeping someone around who I won't be able to get a handle on and who I think is hurting the town. ##Vote: Palmar Firstly, confrontational and empty is an oxymoron in Mafia. Confrontation brings discussion. Discussion good. Discussion not make posts empty. Secondly, not having a read on someone does not make him anti-town. It makes him just another player in the game. It sure as hell isn't a reason to vote him. Thirdly.....well see the first point about your second one. He got you talking didn't he? :3 | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
On May 04 2012 03:47 DoYouHas wrote: How is fitting the definition of a chainsaw defense wrong? If a player ever uses a chainsaw defence as an actual defence they are scum there is no leeway about it and its bad play all around. People should never use other peoples arguments to make them appear either townie or scum its just bad play and they deserve to be lynched if they do so. Me and Hassy both still expect things from Palmar at some stage we just both dislike you at the moment. -D | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
:3 | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
On May 04 2012 04:43 Drazerk wrote: If you have not played with Palmar you should read his last like 30 games or so this is pretty much is town meta (See that? That is defending someone. You should learn the difference and then ignore it completely as it is worthless) Also I have actively played anti town multiple times and once caught the entire scum team because of it so it is not a bad strategy it just requires some form of brains before you actually attempt it. -D D is a noob -D | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
On May 04 2012 05:14 Drazerk wrote: It only brings confusion and chaos if everyone is bad -D Im a noob -D | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
:3 | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
##Vote: layabout -D | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
-D | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
:3 | ||
|
BlackRaven
43 Posts
Also, Happy Birthday N_T! (that's a messed up smiley) :3 | ||
| ||
