Okay, does this game being called 'bastard mafia' carry some implications I'm missing out on? Everyone's talking about changing win conditions, potentially really strange hidden win conditions/setups, etc etc.

Eiii

United States2566 Posts

April 10 2012 02:57 GMT

#165

I did read it! The win conditions seem pretty clearly laid out, even if they're a little unorthodox

Eiii

United States2566 Posts

April 11 2012 00:40 GMT

#341

It's kind of blowing my mind that people are so excited to post their wincon when there are probably other parties out there interested in keeping them from winning :X

I'm a pretty big fan of lynching lay because this

On April 11 2012 07:31 layabout wrote:
Well i only have 2

is not consistent with what little I know about the game. Between that, the other slipups people have dug up, and him not being on *my* list...

##vote layabout

Eiii

United States2566 Posts

April 11 2012 01:34 GMT

#344

On April 11 2012 09:42 VisceraEyes wrote:
E3 have we ever been in a game together?

I believe we have! How did you know to call me E3? :o

On April 11 2012 09:42 layabout wrote:

Show nested quote +

You are terrible

Eiii

United States2566 Posts

April 11 2012 18:41 GMT

#425

Am I the only one really confused that jackal is getting pushed as town? Take a look at his filter, please-- there's zero content there. I

Eiii

United States2566 Posts

April 11 2012 18:41 GMT

#426

wow pressing tab and then space is awesome.

EBWOP:
I'd lean more towards him being scum or survivor than town.

Eiii

United States2566 Posts

April 11 2012 20:01 GMT

#432

On April 12 2012 04:32 Jackal58 wrote:

Show nested quote +

I never have any content. I'm content with that.

Oh, you're fine, Jackal. Just keep on doing what you do, I know there's pretty much no way to stop you. I'm just confused about layabout's Jackal-started-the-wincon-claim-train-so-he's-town argument. I'm leaning more towards him being survivor.

Eiii

United States2566 Posts

April 11 2012 20:40 GMT

#437

Day 1 is, in my experience, more useful to look back on after the lynch and night action is than anything else-- but that doesn't mean it's useless to call out reads that don't make any sense to me or post my own today.

Eiii

United States2566 Posts

April 13 2012 00:43 GMT

#535

On April 13 2012 08:02 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
... is Johnnywup (Claimed survivor) a worse lynch than me?

Between this:

On April 13 2012 06:37 Drazerk wrote:
He only wins with himself

which you haven't refuted, and this:

On April 13 2012 06:38 johnnywup wrote:

My wincon, as a survivor, includes other people so i'm gonna call bullshit

Seems to suggest that the survivors need to work together somehow. But you don't really seem in on that, which makes you out more to be SK than survivor.

Also, I thought we were going to get game-end conditions today?

Eiii

United States2566 Posts

April 14 2012 17:43 GMT

#611

Oh man, I completely missed the wincon in the daypost the first time around. Apologies!

Anyway, this really is turning out to be bastard mafia. I don't really feel like there's anything I can really accomplish and I'm pretty sure the lynch doesn't even matter that much at this point :/ Honestly, I'm just kind of holding out that something crazy happens day 3 that really shakes things up.

Eiii

United States2566 Posts

April 14 2012 23:17 GMT

#637

On April 15 2012 03:07 Drazerk wrote:

Show nested quote +

Full role claim

Your protection targets and roles

Now!

Sure. I'm survivor (gasp) who wins if any of me, sbrubbles, jackal, greymist, or bluelightz are alive at the end of the game. Also, there's someone who *can't* be alive at the end, too, but I don't want to reveal who that is!

someone update the chart it's about to get hairy

Eiii

United States2566 Posts

April 15 2012 00:04 GMT

#642

I don't need to kill someone at all! It's just that someone has to die.

Which, given that the game ends when there are only three people left, isn't a requirement I'm super concerned about.

Eiii

United States2566 Posts

April 15 2012 01:06 GMT

#648

Fun fact: we don't have evidence of anything *except* survivors, blues, and SKs this game. I'm pretty sure there isn't a town, and the game end condition seems to support that. What's your win condition again, draz? You mentioned something about having to keep GM alive-- which happens to be one of my win conditions, too! It kind of seems like we're as close to being on the same team as possible, so why are you so eager to kill me?

Eiii

United States2566 Posts

April 15 2012 01:30 GMT

#650

On April 15 2012 10:10 johnnywup wrote:

Show nested quote +

Obviously, but in this game you don't really win with town even if you're town, you win if you're the last 3, if I understand correctly. So what's the difference between killing town and killing survivors?

Nah, everyone seems to have separate win conditions-- some of which involve making sure a certain person (or persons) is or isn't in those final three!

Eiii

United States2566 Posts

April 16 2012 08:43 GMT

#692

of course I'm sheeping, the way for me (and probably most people) to win in this game is to just kind of sit back and make sure enough of the wrong people don't die so that I can win. So far, none of the lynch targets have been on my list-o-friends. So I voted them to their lynch.

You want to pretend there's a town and vote for whoever looks scummy or whatever? Go for it, there's a good chance I'll happily vote for them too.