EPT
A Game of Thrones Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
| ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
| ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
Acrofales On March 21 2012 22:54 Acrofales wrote: Okay seriously WTF. I know I'm new to this game, but voting me for that reason alone makes no sense. In fact, it seems quite a scum move to cast suspicion on people right at the start of the game. Or am I going overboard and it's just a way of getting people to post at the start of the game? Either way, I'm watching you and risk.nuke. Voting off the bat seems fishy. This seems like a slight overeaction to what is essentially a nothing vote, plus making a theory which he then backs down from almost straight away: As for the rest, I've calmed down a bit, with later people talking about the random votes. It is my first game (ever) and I was hoping to live past the first day. People instavoting for me got me a bit upset. I am happy to unvote Matthew when a better candidate comes up, the ghost of High Heart is kinda cryptic when it comes to her prophecies It was more of a "if you vote for me, then I'll vote for you"-thing anyway. Seems very keen to try to suddenly make friends with everyone again eh? GreYMisT On March 22 2012 01:20 GreYMisT wrote: Guys I say we lynch Wherebugsgo, just to be certain. Sand/Syllo can you guys sign you posts? It makes it a lot easier for the rest of us to keep track of who thinks what. Xatalos, I'm interested on what you think about Wherebugsgo/littlefinger. How do you think we should go about interacting with him now that we know he is 3rd party? Also i would like to assure everyone that even though I am hosting Aperture Mafia, the science will not keep me from being active here. Seems too keen to play on the confusion around WBG. Lynching him even though it is explicitly stated that he is unlynchable? Explain to us why he is. One of these content-less scumesq posts imo. Lets hear some actual opinions on people? On the topic of Wherebugsgo, I'd love to completely ignore him if possible, though I doubt that will end up happening.... | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
| ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
I understand the need to question someone who is trying to lynch, but he was only asking for a post from Acro about his constant forwards and back with his opinions. If he wants to prove to be innocent (To the extent that is possible at this point in the game) then he should tell us what he makes of the game thusfar. | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
On March 22 2012 03:48 GreYMisT wrote: Has ON even posted? It appears not, though a lot of people have posted very little. I'm still as happy as earlier to say we should lynch a lurker if there is not enough reason to lynch a specific person, which I would say there is not, although I still would say Acro is a little suspicious, but I can't tell if he's scum or just new, or both. | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
| ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
| ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
| ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
Lets try to get him talking | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
Double # :3 | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
Vote OriginalName | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
##Vote OriginalName | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
| ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
On March 22 2012 05:32 MrZentor wrote: Hello people of Mafia! It is I, MrZentor! Anyways, I thought this started a day after it did, so I am a little late to the party. Let me tell everybody my opinion, so you can get a good read on me! First we have Acrofales overreacting to a vote that didn't have a basis. He then votes for Mattchew. Lyter defends Acrofales. Then Mattchew, bad spelling in hand, attacks Lyter for defending Acrofales I really don't like that Mattchew attacks Lyter for defending Acrofales, who I think at this point is innocent. It also seems silly that Mattchew is 100% positive that Acrofales is innocent over one nooby overreaction. If you look at Mattchew's filter, you will see he only said something slightly helpful when he was asked to; everything else is just him attacking other people without any real reason. For now, I think he is most likely to be scum. I have nothing against pushing the point, as we are yet to see a real responce for Acrofales, who I would personally like to see make a stance and give his opinion on the current ongoings. Although I do agree the way in which he "pushed his point" was pretty brash, it doesn't scream mafia to me atm. | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
On March 22 2012 18:01 Acrofales wrote: Lurkers Yes, you: Nicolas, Layabout, Zealos, Sinensis, Evantrees, Lyter and Risen. Why should we not lynch you, you're clearly not contributing anything. I've been asleep/Working for a few hours, was fairly active before. Give me 10 mins to read over the newest developments. | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
Acro: Why have you still not given some definitive thoughts? I asked a couple of pages ago and there is still nothing, are you just avoiding the question? The only people you say should be lynched atm are Lurkers, of which I am one, even though I have been fairly active. You made a point against gumshoe but haven't really elaborated or spoken of it since. I want to see you actually follow through on what you are saying. Gumshoe Alot of your posts seem completly substanceless, and make you look active, without making any strong stances. Such as Also do we want to elect a mayor? Also can we keep the Hodor's to a minimum? When he finally begins to make a case against Acro, we get this very odd quote Acrofales seeing as your lynch is getting to be pretty likely maybe you should role claim? Is this noob or scum? Not easy to tell, but some of your other posts make it seem closer to the latter. So overall, so far, my Lynch list would be: 1. Acro 2. Gumshoe | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
 | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
The reason on the sudden flip about Grey was me being overeager to have an opinion, and not consider the fact it may well be a joke. As for the copy of opinions already voiced, for me personally, if I agree with someone, I would rather elaborate on what they have said, rather than I simpler QFT or such. Though I'm not sure where I defended gumshoe? | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
| ||
| ||
