EPTMy first game!
Newbie Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
My first game! | ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
Cupcakes for you guys  Just spent like 2 hours reading all the various material. Far more in depth than the real life version (which I have played a varient of) lol. | ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
| ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
On October 28 2011 10:26 Cyber_Cheese wrote: + Show Spoiler + This could be a good time to run through the use of colour. On October 28 2011 09:00 IMABUNNEH wrote: Is the day/night cycles in real time, so 1 per real life day? Couldn't find it posted anywhere, either I'm blind, stupid, or a bit of both perhaps :D Questions about the setup/game should be asked in green, like this. Kita, you have access to the sacred blue text, why don't you use it more liberally? So the mods can easily see it while looking through the game. It doesn't have to be a mod that On October 24 2011 00:35 kitaman27 wrote: Posting: Mod Font: This is mod font. It is reserved for moderators. Please do not use it. Question Font: This is question font. Use it to ask the moderators questions about the rules. Please do us a favor and read the rules before you ask anything. Red can be used as much as you want, but is best reserved for the things you want to draw attention to. When using colour use bold over the coloured words, or they look piddly like this... Isn't this better? Oh and just as a general thing, use the search function on page 1 if you have a question at the very least, believe me it saved me from asking quite a few dumb questions so far ^_^ Thanks  Also can't believe I missed that super obvious part in the first post. Must pay more attention from now on! | ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
| ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
| ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
| ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
Anyway I can't believe all those bronies died D= I~ don't know if I want to live in a place where someone would hurt ponies  | ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
You're a bunneh, you're probably next after bronies. | ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
| ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
Either toads or risk.nuke definately look a bit dodgy. Both of the posts struck me as quite aggressive in turning it into finger pointing. I don't think getting all up in peoples' grills immediately is what we want. It's just going to get innocent people on the defensive from the start. Drem has so far poked at someone randomly as a "joke" and then at myself for not getting immediately aggressive. Who's next, risk.nuke for BEING aggressive? :p I don't think finger pointing every 6 posts at a different person is going to help us. I doubt someone with almost no activity at this point is likely to be scum though. So even though Skrammen hasn't said anything,I'd rule him out for the time being and look at the "half-active" posters. risk.nuke and hacklebeast are both pretty aggressive in getting people to turn on someone so early. | ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
On October 31 2011 01:27 risk.nuke wrote: Getting in peoples faces is precisly what we want. How else do you expect to catch scum? When people are all aggro at each other, that's the best time to watch for slips right? That's what I'd have thought anyway. So I'm watching them more closely. Even if that was what you thought, why were you so quick to tell everyone what you thought toad ment. He wasn't about to get lynched.. If that's what he thought when he wrote it he wouldn't had have any problems telling us that himself, if he's scum he might had given a scumslip. 2 people coming to each others' defense early on in the game isn't something I'd have expected either. Interpreting someone else's words to make them seem "nicer" than they were stated... | ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
There was no coming to each others' defense, as he has said nothing in my defense. Hmm good point, that'll teach me to reread better. We still haven't heard from Skrammen though, and I still think Toad is dodgy. Since other than telling people they should post more posts, he hasn't really said anything. | ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
On October 31 2011 05:36 Drem903 wrote: Zanfada also has not posted at all since his initial accusation, so he should also be one to consider for now. Yeah. Maybe they were just trying to get the ball rolling, or maybe they were trying to start people recieving flak early on. I'd go out on a limb and put odds on at least one of them being scum. Still have a day before having to vote at least to gauge that one more though. | ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
| ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
On October 31 2011 05:40 Skrammen wrote: And just a head's up: Since we have people from both sides of the pond in this game there is bound to be somewhat of a delay in answers and people might be working or sleeping when some discussions takes place. We should be somewhat tolerant of this, but obviously 24 hours of no posting is not good. 2 posts in almost 24 hours is almost as bad as 24 hours of nothing though, and as a reference, the people on both sides of the pond (myself and Toads for Europe, for example) have multiple posts. Have you been working all Sunday or something? | ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
@IMABUNNEH even though i don't like inactives either, direct attacks seem a bit off. He is not the only one who is post very little (i only see the same 5-6 returning while reading). I didn't mean it as a direct attack, though reading it it is more aggressive than I intended. It's an attempt to get him posting SOMETHING rather than nothing, and asking him where he's been is as good as any. @all: i would to remind you all of my previously posted opinion about Zanfada. It seems to me he overcompensates the lack of simple and clear arguments by huge blocks of text. He's definately FOS from me since a little earlier. It just seems a whole lot of nothing. | ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
That kind of tomfoolery reeks of someone trying to be "too obvious" to me. I've got a couple of hours to make my vote still, but for now, FOS on Toad. | ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
Mafia can't really kill me right now, because if they do and I flip green town gets massive amounts of information from previous posts since I was a topic the last pages. Same with zanfas, that is if he turns out to be green. I think this sounds like you're already getting reasoning behind not being killed. You jump around a lot and most of your posts seem like you're going out of your way to let people know you're totally town. Other people look suspicious, but to me this looks like a balls out attempt to control the game yourself among newer players. For that reason... ##Vote Toadesstern | ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
But most interestingly, I feel the need to emphasize this again. Nobody is taking his side. Allow me. Or at least my view on it. I would say to those voting Skrammen, is inactivity the only reason? I'd have thought if he WAS scummy he'd have come out and said SOMETHING by now, rather than just toppling over without a fight. Even a new scum would try and do something to alleviate themselves wouldn't they? Voting the inactives isn't a bad choice for what was pointed out earlier (was it by Toads?), that at the very least if they AREN'T scum then they're not that helpful either. But I think the scum would have shown themselves by now. I also think the fact that he has the MOST votes is telling more of the voters than anything. Scum are more likely to team up votes right? So out of those of you who HAVE voted on him, Zanfa, Xsksc, Harbinger, Chocolate, Toad, Ciry... as I type this that's the first time I've counted 6 already?I agree we should lynch someone suspicious, but unless someone can give me a better reason than "he hasn't posted much", I can't agree to the Skrammen lynching. I still think Toad is an obvious read, though Zanfa has been awfully quiet since the blame shifted away from him. A question though: Harbinger's post history seems to be about 50% condemning Skrammen even before other people joined in, and he hasn't really relented or even looked much at anyone else. Why are you so focused on Skrammen? | ||
| ||
