[T][M]Experimental Haunted Mafia

On August 04 2011 11:39 redFF wrote:
I'm thinking this could get And then were none style, cool!

So I've been playing on mafiascum and at mafiascum they ask questions at the start of the game, so i put this one forward to all the other players.

What are your intentions this game?

On August 05 2011 01:09 Curu wrote:
The amount of lunatics increased. Enraged at the perceived insult, Syllogism ripped off the zombie Amber[LighT]'s arm and stuffed it in Amber's mouth, ensuring Amber's continued silence as the zombie munched happily on his own undead flesh.

Trotske, the insecure hermaphrodite, nervously stammered its input before retreating back into its own corner, afraid to be ridiculed by its peers.

Coagulation smoothly reassured his companions of his good intentions, wearing an oily smile that never touched his eyes. Despite his reassurances, the wickedly curved sickle with I AM DEATH splotched across it in the blood of fifty virgins subtly proclaimed that his intentions were anything but good.

Meapak_Ziphh, the stinky uneducated hobo, introduced himself much to the chagrin of all assembled.

bumatlarge, more commonly known as Bruce Wayne, say quietly in his seat carefully observing the gathered people.

And finally Palmar, the snakery snake snake, drew himself up as he hissed at the crowd,

"Sssssssss join my cultsssssssssssssssssssss," he proclaimed, pulling out a piece of wrinkled parchment with terms on it. "Firsssssssssssssssssssssssst to kill the detecctivessssssssssssss getssssssssssss one week paid leave."

What horrors are in store for the brave and faithful Curu? Will he be eaten by the zombie Amber, beaten to death by the lunatic kitaman, seduced by the disturbingly attractive hermaphrodite Trotske? Or, much more likely, will he meet his end at the hands of the oily incarnation of pure evil, Coagulation? Only time will tell........

On August 05 2011 22:35 Mig wrote:


I was not speculating on the role set-up from nothing.


This combined with there being a n0 where no townies have claimed to have had to do anything to do makes it seem to me that recruiter is the most likely setup.

The part about meapak being the one selected is speculation but he makes the most logical sense to me. Regardless there is nothing wrong with speculating on the setup at the beginning of day 1.

On August 06 2011 02:50 Coagulation wrote:
##vote Trotske

On August 06 2011 03:45 Varpulis wrote:
Meta argument: bad. You can play really well one game and really terribly the next, but if your behavior is the same, and your arguments follow the same logic, i'll call you town as easily in the second as in the first.

Lynch based on behavior in the game, and actions with scum motivations, not because he hasn't filled his quota.

Trotske who do you think is scummy?

On August 06 2011 09:15 redFF wrote:

explain

On August 06 2011 10:45 Amber[LighT] wrote:
You're voting coag bc you fear he won't post at all or because you legit think his play is scummy? Either scenario is trumped by the idea that his meta involves him doing nothing until about day 3 regardless of his alignment. Unless you think he's a threat to the "town" I don't think he's the best lynch target.

I always find it fascinating to see how the pregame chat changes as soon as day starts. With that said I really think palmar is the best lynch candidate as of right now. His pregame cult thing kinda got me nervous. It's a good cover up to hang backon later in the game.


#vote: Palmar

On August 06 2011 11:21 Coagulation wrote:


if you say so.

I voted trotske cause of the stupid breadcrumbs he was oblivious about. I dont see anyone scummier. I noticed alot of people ignored the question tho and Its probably a good idea to keep an eye on them also.

On August 06 2011 12:08 Mig wrote:


So why didn't you post that reason at the time of your vote? And trotske has done plenty of suspicious things since then. Last page he said red was the scummiest person yet voted curu. Every time someone asks troske his opinion he lists a different person he is suspicious of. But instead of bringing any of these points up you lurk not posting then only show up once someone votes for you. If you actually thought trotske was still the scummiest you could have made a case to actual push him for a lynch but you chose not to.

On August 06 2011 13:03 redFF wrote:

and then you immediately voted someone else. What gives?