EPTPick Their Power Mafia 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On July 18 2011 20:26 deconduo wrote: There may be another secret alignment. Not sure if anyone has noticed, but this was an addition from the previous game to the OP. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On July 25 2011 11:56 Mig wrote: Yea I assume no one else can use the wand. I just say give it back to sandroba. I normally think double lynches for town are insanely good but considering mafia can pick when they want to roleblock. I would rather not risk it. What makes you think mafia has a roleblocker? Seems pretty unlikely to me. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On July 25 2011 12:00 OriginalName wrote: Would anyone object to me giving the wand to Mig for now? I would. For all we know, Mig could give it back to his scum partner who is capable of using it. On July 25 2011 11:59 Mig wrote: Why is it unlikely? Last ptp there were several rbing roles. Are you sure about that? It just seems unlikely enough that we shouldn't based our plans around the assumption. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On July 25 2011 20:57 sandroba wrote: Foolishness is right. Let's lynch kita, he been useless and been subtly pushing suspicion into everyone with his question. ##Vote: Kitaman27 On July 25 2011 09:36 sandroba wrote: if you are pushing hard a lynch for a lynch based on shoody evidence I'll tunnel you into oblivion. *cough cough* On July 25 2011 21:07 syllogism wrote: I concur on kitaman, he hasn't expressed his opinion on the main topic of the day while asking questions which pretty much only serve to make EVERYONE involved look suspicious On July 25 2011 11:03 kitaman27 wrote: Is it safe to assume that all roles were assigned separate from alignment? Or do we have another host created rivalry like last game with the batman and joker? Two questions were about the set-up. I never passed them off as an attempt at a contribution. Sandroba gave away a kp an hour into the game to a guy named Voldermort. Nobody found that weird? (I'm not saying Sandroba is scum, I'm just questioning why he would ever do something so rash) Mig shot down a town controlled kp plan because of the possible presence of a roleblocker. I found that unlikely and stated so. Like it or not, Jackal posted his pm's from hosts and as unfair as it is, its pretty likely that he is town. Saying that the scum have access to town win conditions is probably damage control, but that kind of speculation takes away from the spirit of the game I suppose . Lunch time is over so I won't be able to post more until I get home, but to jump on me because I'm "useless" a few hours into the game is rather silly. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
There are three people who have mentioned I've been trying to make others look suspicious by questioning them (You disappoint me Wiggles). Hate to break to you guys, but I can't question someone for being suspicious if they're not suspicious in the first place. I asked Sandroba why he was giving his kp away so readily. That's a valid question. The only reason I'm not pushing it further and willing to think he is just a misguided townie is because he was the first person to identify Jackal's town win condition. From what the town is saying, you would think I'm a propaganda spewing machine. Lets take a look at our dead scum. On July 25 2011 23:20 Tackster wrote: I suggest YM, heist and kita as possible targets On July 25 2011 23:24 Tackster wrote: Oh and to explain my target choices: YM - That vig shot was just awful and to cover yourself with 'mafia would never do this' is pure drivel Heist - You seemed too into the item game from the start and seemed to be breadcrumbing you had an item or were harry (not scummy but close to lying IMO) kita - this has been explained at length. Lurk much? On July 26 2011 00:28 Tackster wrote: Suspects: Kitaman Jackal heist sandroba YM (dead) Cool, I'm apparently his top suspect. (omg bus! -_-) Last game scum tried to bandwagon me day one because of my "uselessness" and then ended up shooting me day two when I attacked half their team. I fail to see how my contribution is any different from half the other players. I'm not lurking, I'm posting when I'm available. I'm not putting any effort into trying to blend in. That's what scum do. People are just repeating my name a bunch of times without providing valid reasoning. If push comes to shove, I'll take an alignment check, but I would much rather see it used on someone else as a confirmed scum is much more useful than a confirmed town. I'll post in a little bit on who I would prefer it to be. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On July 26 2011 08:04 sandroba wrote: Yo kita, since you are here, are you willing to take THE TEST? By test, I assume you refer to the alignment check? I'll take it only if I'm forced to. Obviously, I'm going to push for someone else so it wouldn't be wasted, but I'll assume that's what you would expect everyone to say. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On July 26 2011 08:11 sandroba wrote: Well, I really think you are scum and a lot of people share my opinion. In your position, the best thing you can do if you are really town is to do the check, so we can move to someone else and hope ss gets shot at night or something, so you are confirmed. Is there anything I could say otherwise that could change your mind? I honestly don't see how you see me as scummy. The only logical argument you can make is that I haven't caught scum yet, but no one has. I'm not trying to push a scum agenda. You haven't even bothered to make an argument because there isn't one. If I can't convince town to use it on others, I'll take the test if when I pass, town agrees to let me select the lynch  | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
The OP says no posts restrictions are allowed in roles. Either 1) An exception to the rules was made for your role 2) You've created your own post restriction. If its the first, claim that you do indeed have a post restriction and if that is false, your role creator can counter claim that you are lying. If its the second, you are distracting town. Who cares what you are saying when you're posts are full of progamer names! lolz | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On July 26 2011 08:23 chaos13 wrote: I completely agree with you. Kita is asking us to completely give up the democracy of voting and let a single player decide who to lynch That's not the point though. When I pass the check then I would be practically confirmed town, unless there are multiple people lying about his role or I have a godfather type role, which my role creator can confirm is not true. On day one, I would much rather have a confirmed town decide my fate than a wishy-washy town filled with scum and third party agendas. In truth, nobody is going to go with it so I probably shouldn't have brought it up. I'll post who I want lynched or checked later on. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On July 26 2011 08:24 Foolishness wrote: Your skill of reading between the lines (and the thread for that matter) is pretty  BogusHumor me and tell me the reasoning anyways? | ||
| ||
