EPTLet's have a fun game and remember no foul play, nothing below the belt and Jackal needs spare timber to support all those tunnels so do help out!
Pick Their Power Mafia 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
Let's have a fun game and remember no foul play, nothing below the belt and Jackal needs spare timber to support all those tunnels so do help out! | ||
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
| ||
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
Nah - if i really wanted to distract him i'd have taken him to see bridesmaids... Now there be alot of plot holes! | ||
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
On July 25 2011 09:27 Drazerk wrote: well somebody failed at not making me overpowered... + Show Spoiler + I AM CAPTAIN PLANET By killing scum they no longer pollute the world so I can locate the missing planeteers to gain back my powers. 1 scum dead - Medic protection 3 scum dead - Night time KP 5 scum dead - Detective checks I can use all powers every night and if I die the sun mourns my death and prevents the next three night phases. LOL @ COMPLETE FAKERY Also det checks > night kills??? Not likely.. | ||
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
On July 25 2011 09:32 Curu wrote: Clearly you have not played with Drazerk yet. He has a new fake claim at the start of every cycle. Yea it's my first time with him.. I stand by that tactic (  ) | ||
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
On July 25 2011 09:47 Palmar wrote: So the content of your post is: a) let's actually not lynch liars b) I'll tunnel anyone who dares scumhunt, unless I agree with their methods/arguments. I haz been ninja'd | ||
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
On July 25 2011 09:49 sandroba wrote: a) yes, unless vigs fail to shoot them. b) no, read it better and you will see. Except that: a) forcing vig shots on liars and lurkers is like saying 'who has a kill visitors role and WANTS to be shot tonight?' b) you say you'll tunnel anyone based on shoddy evidence and then say that we can't lynch liars... what kind of amazingly accurate evidence do you expect day 1? | ||
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
b) you say you'll tunnel anyone that votes based on shoddy evidence and then say that we can't lynch liars... what kind of amazingly accurate evidence do you expect day 1? | ||
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
On July 25 2011 10:02 OriginalName wrote: Yo Potter you gotta hook up with me we gots scum to catch and all dat shitz. Is this a post restriction or has the meaning of it just completely gone over my head? | ||
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
If i had taken him to a different movie we might have wedding dresses, all sparks or green lantern rings... | ||
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
On July 25 2011 10:26 Curu wrote: This game is Harry Potter Mafia? Did I miss something wut? One idea: everyone can claim their own roles. That doesn't activate the penalty AFAIK. Then if anyone lies at all then their role creator can call them out. This allows us to coordinate everyone's powers and dissenters can be lynched. Effectively we can coordinate everyone's actions and avoid hero syndrome or people using their powers in an Anti Town way (can also somewhat cripple the Mafia's powers). The only weakness I can see is that it lets the Mafia pick and choose their targets among who has the most powerful roles. However, they already know many of the roles of Town (the ones they themselves created) so it's not all that debilitating. Thoughts? Now this is a terrible plan.... Tell the mafia EXACTLY who the power roles are... Is this your first game? | ||
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
On July 25 2011 10:30 OriginalName wrote: Not even alternate win condition, im just vanilla until i fulfill certain conditions. Excuse me but i think you need to defend your behaviour here... You've basically outed your role name, you've outed aspects of your role and your suggesting we might mass claim... all within 90 minutes of the game commencing... Are you lying your ass off, way too casual with your information or scummy scum scum? | ||
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
On July 25 2011 10:33 Curu wrote: I don't get why it helps Mafia more than Town. They already know several roles so they can pick and choose who to take out from there already. If a DT finds himself roleblocked all the time then we know who the roleblockers are and can narrow down the suspect. It's basically operating under full disclosure and I don't see how that benefits anti Town more than Town. @Tackster EVERYONE is a power role, why does that matter? @redFF Derp read the thread, deconduo just explicitly said role claiming does not activate the penalties. Well: EVERYONE is a power role, why does that matter? I didn't realise you had a role list... Last PYP i had a terrible vote effect. They already know several roles so they can pick and choose who to take out from there already. You imply it's negative they know possibly 5-8 roles but want to give them 25 to pick from. Mafia will know 25 roles and all of their mates. They can pick the killers, docs, checkers and predict what effects will be used against them. They can avoid wasting KP on bulletproofs. Town will know 25 roles and have to check 25 people.... Any pro-town secret mechanics (such as you can kill a mafia IF [condition]) will be void. Mass claim is a terrible plan... | ||
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
On July 25 2011 10:40 sandroba wrote: K ON, I'm giving you the stick. Claim your target before you use it. Sand don't give anyone the stick yet. Assuming you believe whats being said that's KP. better that KP not be in play rather than risking mafia get it. And that's only if it IS KP.. Wait for someone to check ON or some counter claims to be made. Why are people making decisions 2 hours into day 1? | ||
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
Also why are people claiming 2 hours into day 1? WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON? | ||
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
On July 25 2011 10:54 OriginalName wrote: I can gurantee that Jackal is most certainly not Fake Claiming. as other than my slight formatting errror only the Names and the bolded line were different. VERSUS This Line was nowhere near mentioned in my PM, also It just said Each item you or Harry Collects will grant the holder a Power. slip? If it 'just' said that then why do you say the entire message with descriptions of the items was the same? | ||
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
On July 25 2011 10:56 Nisani201 wrote: There is probably a Snape, and in that case we should wait the whole Harry Potter/Voldemort thing out until Snape claims. Harry and Voldy were named in the opening posts - no other characters were mentioned | ||
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
Good Job town. I'm going to bed but i can't wait to see wtf is going on tomorrow. | ||
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
Apart from that I was shocked to see that day kill! Days are 48 hours long - surely sandroba having a stick up his...attic... is not worth 3 roleclaims, a day shot and the beginnings of a bandwagon. Chaos13 seems to be the only one who's done any analysis as opposed to 'i just read everything so do what i say'. I myself haven't analysed much but seeing as I can't sleep i'll go back and try and generate a proper timeline of events... Everyone take a chill pill and wash it done with some methodone... | ||
|
Tackster
Ireland429 Posts
On July 25 2011 14:41 Curu wrote: @Wiggles It has nothing to do with randomization unless two people decided to make their roles together. dec stated he doesn't want any role organization plans or w/e so I think it's most certainly dec's creation. Then again I don't understand how they are exactly identical roles and the decision to place Hallows around, since Jackal claimed he has a Mason-type role and that was what ON's was too. The possibilities I see are: 1) Two people decided they wanted to put Harry/Voldy in the game and collaborated together to do so (against dec's urging not to) 2) Dec created two roles for people by himself (???) 3) Dec took two roles that were Mason roles and decided to add onto them himself I highly, highly doubt someone just decided to put it into their role to kill Harry Potter as he can't even know Harry Potter would be in the game. I'm almost certain this is dec's doing, and if so then what I am saying makes sense. You said you were all for lynching Jackal and now you're saying that jackals claim was well founded? If you believe jackals claim and agree both roles were mason how can you call jackal a 3rd party mason? | ||
| ||
