EPTTL Mafia XXXIX
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
| ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 04 2011 11:51 Conversion wrote: /confirm fml i picked ap week to sign up for this BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW booo  good luck with those! | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
 | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 04 2011 14:46 orgolove wrote: Is Irish a new player? Could make sense if he's new - he wouldn't want his first game end so quickly. Irish seems like he's claiming to be a pretty experienced player, what with him linking to a Mafia group outside TL that he is a member of. | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 05 2011 04:33 Kurumi wrote: Numbers? What numbers? 13 2 6 3 2 2 13? They're just to cast more suspicion on me,like hey! Random numbers MUST be something! No. I just felt like typing them. My type of posting might be connected to English being my second language (the biggest thing is repeating names which I am not comfortable with,where in Polish I need to find 2347234 possibilities to avoid typing the same thing in one,even two sentences.) It was wrong to assume my thought process will apply to everyone and I understand that mistake. Just to put some emphasis: 13 2 6 3 2 2 13 is nothing,but I might get some link if You want to make them mystical,You know. Unless you're a 13 year old girl who thinks she is "z0mG s0o0o0o0 rAnDuMB!!!@~``1", you got it. Clearest scum signal so far along with: On May 04 2011 17:19 orgolove wrote: Lies. Haunted Mafia: Insane Another (as of yet unknown) game: Lynch all liars. Lynch all liars indeed. FOS: Kurumi Redtooth | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 05 2011 08:30 Cthsazsa wrote: Excuse me? I guess I misunderstand your meaning of inactive. I thought inactive is pretty self-explanatory. They're not actively participating in this game of Mafia, as I stated right after what you made bold in my post. Why are you so quick to point fingers and call me out as scum? You totally ignored the topic of my post, and instead exaggerated a few words to make my post appear misleading and anti-town. He is quick to call you out because you claimed that lurking scum isn't a threat. I'm sure you can see how suspicious that is... | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 05 2011 09:32 Cthsazsa wrote: If you say so big guy. On May 05 2011 09:22 Cthsazsa wrote: You can quit trolling me now. On May 05 2011 09:09 Cthsazsa wrote: I bet that's very entertaining. On May 05 2011 08:42 Cthsazsa wrote: Nice conclusion there, Jackal. Very intelligent. So many of Cthsazsa's posts are wannabe aloof and flip, trying to shut down discussion. So much passive aggressiveness seems to me like you are trying way to hard to seem above suspicion. | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 05 2011 12:34 Cthsazsa wrote: What else is there to say? He's calling me scum for no real reason. Apparently he's trying to throw off everyone and get us to waste our day 1 votes. It's possible, I doubt that he wants that though. More likely he was trying to see how you react to some mild pressure. But your way overreaction and attitude makes me think that a vote for you on day 1 wouldn't be wasted at all. | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 05 2011 12:49 VarpuliS wrote: elmizzt, do you often refer to yourself in the third person? Cthsazsa, you've used the "they want us to waste our votes" twice now, I believe. I've got my eye on you. You didn't respond well to jackal's tunneling, and now you disregard the reason elmizzt voted for you. FoS I don't normally, and I don't think I did in those posts? o.O Unless you misread or I typed ambiguously. Or unless you are referring to something else. Clarify please? | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 05 2011 13:04 VarpuliS wrote: Look at this post. Cthsazsa quotes you, responds to your post by saying: Your response is in the third person, even though he was asking about you. lol. Oh, I interpreted his post as referring to and defending his responses to jackal, so in my posts "he" was referring to jackal. | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 05 2011 13:13 Cthsazsa wrote: elmizzt you didn't answer my questions. varpulis answered your question. I think it was fairly well stated. | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 05 2011 13:22 VarpuliS wrote: Ah, I see. nvm then, I get what you were talking about. It's past midnight, and I have classes tomorrow. I'm going to sleep now, I'll see you all tomorrow. nighty varp | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 06 2011 04:15 orgolove wrote: Great post. We need to look at the people who've been pointing fingers indiscriminately, like 5, 18, and 22. Hmm... I'm trying to see a pattern here between the players the reds want to coordinate against or no. Are the numbers in chronological order of the way they were speaking out against? It seems that they are in the order that they appear in the roster in the OP. Basically the order that players signed up in. | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 06 2011 04:23 orgolove wrote: I mean - in terms of the order they spoke in the thread- i.e. chaoser, in order, accused 27, 21, 1, 22, 15, 9 in the thread within the span of 1 day. Hm. Can you give me this spreadsheet? I may have some pattern recognition software that I might be able to gather, and coordinate the time of the accusatory posts with the contents to see if a particular group of players (reds) were on-line and accusing the same person at around the same point in time. oh, that's embarrassing lol. my mistake | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 06 2011 04:28 orgolove wrote: Oh wow. I didn't even realize it was chaoser himself that made the spreadsheet. Ugh. Hmm.... No, it was eternalmisfit. | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 06 2011 04:34 Kurumi wrote: That's why You're voting on me? Because I did not make a spreadsheet? I will remember that in the next game,I will make a LOT of them,You know,just to be safe. You're misinterpreting his post. He voted chaoser based on the spreadsheet, but then questioned himself when he thought that chaoser himself made the spreadsheet. At least, that's my take on it. | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 06 2011 04:30 kitaman27 wrote: Redtooth He calls chaoser out for being too safe, yet rather than calling anyone out as scum, he posts a town list. It seems as if he doesn't want to upset anyone so early in the game. I called him out earlier on a lie, not because I care that he was smurfing, but to see how he responds and he completely ignores it. The way he disappears after stirring the pot makes him look shifty, but he claims to have real life obligations, which makes it tough to tell if he is lurking or not. I haven't forgotten about redtooth's dodge of the proof that he was lying either. I'm putting in my vote for him unless he posts an explanation. | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 06 2011 06:51 Kurumi wrote: Yes,I do agree with Your analysis on birth certificate,but could You elaborate what Lol has to do with this? Do You think Lol is scum? is this language barrier or wtf? o.O | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 06 2011 06:55 Kurumi wrote: I think we shouldn't joke about Lol being scum. I know birth certificate behaved weird,but.. it does not make any sense! + Show Spoiler + It is a joke! Sorry, based on your previous posts, it seemed enough in line with them to be serious... | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 06 2011 07:04 Forumite wrote: If you are blue, now´s the time to roleclaim. Why are you arguing that day-vigilante is a good move by using probabilities you yourself think are wrong? I believe he is arguing against Chaoser by calling him out and saying that if Chaoser is really so confident (70%) then he should demand for a vig kill based on the math of the confidence Chaoser himself stated. | ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/jEcjA.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/QrdnS.png)
