EPTTeam Mini Mafia III BCE
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On January 06 2011 23:28 deconduo wrote: Everyone claims to be a cop and gives out a report, if/when the real cop dies town can then look at what the reports were. Its used in situations with a roleblocker or when theres no medic protection so that cop can't safely claim openly. The biggest disadvantage with it is that mafia can work out who the cop is quicker than normal by eliminating people who give wrong reports. He means that. I don't know what I think about the plan. I feel like it'll create more confusion than it's worth and there might not even be a cop so we're just implementing a plan that goes nowhere and ends up flooding the thread with fake "reports" and people can get away with easy lying | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On January 07 2011 17:10 TheMango wrote: since we've largely ignored this team, what does everyone think of Deconduo/Chezinu? I haven't seen anything from them except decundo trying to convince everyone to 'hypocop'. I don't get a scum tell from that necessarily, but they have been on the quiet side so far otherwise. @aidnai: as for flamwheel/orgolove, I don't agree with your analysis aidnai. Orgolove's activity has been spotty in the other game I'm in as well, and I don't see any major deviations in posting (I also do not get a scum feel from him in that game either) If I had to vote now, it would be between kingjames/aidnai (kingjames for his over the top response in trying to get subversion lynched, which was based off faulty data - aidnai for pushing for 0 discussion during night) and subversion/incognito (for obvious reasons, could be lying about being roleblocked). I'd like to hear from incognito if possible, since he's been largely MIA this game. You know, at first read through of deconduo's posts I thought he was townie but reading through it I notice that aside from the suggestion of doing hypocop, he mostly pushed for discussion but barely did any himself, mostly just answering questions. I think the post that made me think he was townie was this one: On January 06 2011 01:52 deconduo wrote: It is beneficial in a number of ways: 1. It encourages activity. People don't want to be lynched, so they will (hopefully) start posting more. 2. It gets rid of inactive townies earlier on rather than later. Mafia have no incentive to kill an inactive townie, so they live until the end of the game if they aren't lynched. You then might need to pick a mafia out of a bunch of people with less that 3 posts each, not at all helpful to town. 3. If the mafia do push the lynch to a green rather than a mafia, we still get to look at the voting patterns and the posts. For example today, who voted for BC/Beneather over other inactives, and why? Were BC/Beneather the most inactive team? but looking at it again it's pretty standard to say that stuff whether you mafia or not, there's not a lot of info in there. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
Problems: -Assuming Nemesis is really a DT, why not pick orgolove night one? why not pick me night two? -I don't believe Gmarshal et al are scum. -Doesn't explain Subversion's complete lack of interest in the game. We checked Ace first night because 1) he was semi inactive and 2) Ace is the best player in this game, to not check him would stupid. If he's alive then I don't have to suspect him when he makes it past two days. If he's dead, we'll have wasted a check but I would rather not have to worry about the alignment of Ace. Why would we pick you over Subversion? He claimed he got role blocked. That's suspicious enough for a check. That added in with the fact that he basically came in, said he got blocked and then never even joined in the conversation about the block and discussing the incident at all reeked of scum to me so we decided to check him. I'm pretty sure Mango ain't scum either so obviously you would be trying very very hard to say we're fake claiming cause you red =] | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
i dont really see what the point is of DTs checking inactives if its publicly announced. Surely then mafia will just make sure they're not inactive to avoid being detected? It's a good thing for mafia to be active, active mafia=mafia that's easy spot since they can't hide. His next few posts are just of him repeating that he's voting for BC/Beneather cause they aren't active On January 05 2011 09:00 Subversion wrote: omg, somehow completely fucked something up in the above post, sorry for the random screwed up quotes =/ also need to bold my vote ##Vote Beneather/BC Oh okay, soz, that actually makes a lot of sense. Ugh this Day 1 vote is really just.. meh. Really not much to go on. For now I'm going with: ##Vote Beneather/BC My main reasoning here is that Beneather seems reluctant to say anything without BC being here to give him advice. Seems like a scummy junior would be scared of exposing himself without a senior to run his posts by. Also, BC yet to make an appearance. and finally his last two posts are of him claiming to be roleblocked and then responding to an FoS on him. There's been no contribution or actively of his that in anyway has helped the town. Lynch his ass. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
The reason nemesis had to fake claim: Mafia wants to say subversion fake claimed role block, i.e. there isn't really a roleblocker. That means we're in a setup with 1 blue role. Where's the blue? they had to fake claim. Was hoping some team would come along and point this out, but nobody did. Still wanted to believe in ace/meapak, but I really can't now. how did that make sense lol | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On January 11 2011 14:37 aidnai wrote: making people feel bad. Not as much fun as if I had won, but maybe I learned more this way. GG everyone. my bad dude lol, wasn't trying to make you feel bad. The reason I was going grr over the fake claim is no one fake claims and then just disappears, never to talk about it. Should have been major sign when he claimed and then never showed up again, even at the end of the game when we were discussing it and I kept bringing it up. If anything, he should be the most vocal one cause fuck, he just got targetted by mafia, gotta get those fuckers back. If you were town and you got roleblocked, you wouldn't try to find out who did it? Adding in the fact that he basically said nothing all game and voted for Beneather for being inactive when he was just as inactive, was scum tells all over. Us checking him was just icing on the cake. I don't think most people could do much analysis on mango's previous things in the game cause he played a decent fake townie. He didn't say much but he was active and fuck, most people didn't say much so he fell in with those. Even I thought he wasn't mafia till the very end when he basically threw everything away to save Subversion and pin mafia role on nemesis and me. I told nemesis to play it a bit inactive and post not so much but say what he needed to say in his posts so no one would think we were blue and we were right =] too bad that also caused you to think we were mafia =/ Overall it was a good game though the midgame was semi inactive, I'd do this again lol, it's nicer than having 30 people screaming at each other (or in the case of XXXV, not due to inactivity lol). I think having the modkill but no ban would have been nice. Would have forced subversion to speak a bit more | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
| ||
