• Log InLog In
• Register

TL Mafia XXXIV: Pokemafia

Post a Reply 1 2 3 4 Next All

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 09 2010 17:08 GMT #120 Keen /in =D

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 10 2010 04:04 GMT #290 It's going to take me a while to read all this since I just logged in to check my PM. Super new to TL. Also liked the story, it's always better when the host uses colourful language. Are we supposed to vote? I think I'll have to lurk some more before I take a wild guess. Ima be reading all yo posts brosefs.

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 10 2010 04:25 GMT #293 "And because the medic wants to find the cop so he can protect him." Medic's don't know who to protect unless they personally know the other player(s) and want to ensure they stay in the game. If the medic is a new player/ doesn't know anybody they're more likely to protect themselves (or is that not allowed?). In my opinion, we should in-actives. If only so that each active player can have at least a day or 2 of contribution and can be verbally felt up for tells/contradictions. Also because it would be funny if an inactive mafia was voted out. If we do go along the lines of keeping inactives, here are my impressions so far: It seems to me that Gabriel wants to fight everybody. Honestly not a great way of uniting the townsfolk if you ask me. I'd rather keep people who aren't so difficult to talk to. You're my vote if we go along this path. Infundibulum seems to be experienced in TL mafia and so has garnered some not so avid fans. You're a blank slate to me so I have nothing against you and am quite happy to keep you in for a while longer =).

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 10 2010 04:42 GMT #298 Yeh I've read that some people here intend to vote off inactives later anyway. Which makes sense as late game inactives are more likely to be mafia and are definitely not valuable, contributing villagers. Honestly if I was a vet and mafia I would do my best to organise the town. It gives me credibility as an upstanding citizen and allow me to slay naysayers behind everyone's back. I'd be getting the best of both worlds. But definitely a vet who doesn't try to glue the people together and does the opposite is making a huge mistake. That's why I would honestly vote for gabe. Regarding the 3 votes to infundibulum (is that true?), can you please state why you're doing so, especially if it was about a previous mafia game. If it's just a personal non-mafia case just say that and I'll get it, but if he did something amazingly sinister to invoke wrath upon himself I'd really like to know.

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 10 2010 04:57 GMT #301 I'm glad you asked that insanious because I also don't know.

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 10 2010 05:04 GMT #306 Ok thanks mang. I voted #gabriel for the reasons given last page. One would assume it'd be common sense not to rub strangers the wrong way unless its for lols. Hope you had sufficient lols credits friend Gabriel.

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 10 2010 07:00 GMT #317 My reasoning for my vote is that Gabe wasn't getting along with the rest of the people on day 1 and if I had to vote then he'd be my 1st choice. Who needs in fighting right? (Except the mafia) Infund so far hasn't earned any of the votes against him as far as our discussion has progressed. And no one as of yet has made a big impression on me. And yes I'm super noob as you can tell by my post count. I really don't know anything.

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 10 2010 14:35 GMT #322 Good points raised by amber. I think it can go either way as well. If Gabe gave solid arguments that were easy to follow then I would honestly have not voted for him. It's like a vote for reason. As it stands I won't be changing my vote for this day phase but I admit it was too hasty. I think it should be emphasised that any one of us voting for gabe could be mafia too (or people voting off infund for that matter) and with 31 players it won't be that hard to get gabe out of the hot water if we want to keep him.

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 11 2010 05:19 GMT #374 I think whatever Gabe did so far pales in comparison to the outbursts we're getting recently. I'm reconsidering my vote.

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 11 2010 05:58 GMT #377 If you want to pick mafia. I can guarantee you one of us picking gabe is a mafia. Just for future reference in case I somehow die overnight somehow. I'm not paranoid or nothing.

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 11 2010 07:46 GMT #382 I'm taking what gabe said with a grain of salt. But I should do the same for everybody else. Sounds pretty rough but if gabe turns out to be a villager then people have a lot of explaining to do.

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 11 2010 13:48 GMT #400 If you guys are gunning for kenpachi, then what about jcarlsoniv? It seems like they're a couple. Also the arguments for kenpachi/zeks are compelling. I think gabe is pretty glad that others are voting for these two so I have to ignore what gabe says honestly, for now. I'm also more curious about whether kenpachi is a mafia than gabriel is. Because kenpachi seems to be more likely mafia than gabriel at this point (im putting gabe down as a quasi helpful townie for now) I will change my vote to kenpachi. Please excuse my laziness to format the capitals/potential grammar mistakes. I came back from a party just now but my will to change vote is strong.

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 11 2010 15:56 GMT #407 There wasn't much to ignore when a lot of what Gabriel said wasn't making much sense. Gabriel had to explain himself again multiple times. As I said it was a vote for reason the very first time I posted in this thread. He seemed like mafia trying to blab a bunch of nonsense to being an outspoken and inconsistent townsie. Also I don't like being called sheep. As soon as I have good reason to vote someone I vote. Colour me offended.

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 12 2010 05:22 GMT #462 = /. Massive sigh. So kenpachi was voted out because: He was a pikachu who acted like mafia. Why would you even do that? Gah. The mafia know who's on their team right? You're the reason why we can't have nice things Kenpachi. He was a pikachu who made out to be mafia by mafia who knew he's always acted suss consistently in every game. I am so disappoint.

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 12 2010 09:19 GMT #475 I regret changing my vote to kenpachi. As a direct result we have to keep gabe for another night/day's worth of discussion. God help us all. Mafia please kill him or me. Kthx.

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 12 2010 16:10 GMT #479 Zeks and kenpachi, but kenpachi and jcarl seemed to back eachother up and focus attention on gabriel. In fact I thought if kenpachi turned out to be mafia, then jcarl would also be mafia so it was a sort of 2 for 1. People did put good arguments for zeks but because I didn't notice him much I didn't think about him, which I suppose makes the arguments against him stronger. Feel free to look at what I've said. I've mostly just been looking at what people have been saying and then briefly looked at 'analyses' of what people said if you want to save yourself some time.

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 12 2010 23:35 GMT #512 DarthThienAn On December 10 2010 23:35 Brocket wrote: Good points raised by amber. I think it can go either way as well. If Gabe gave solid arguments that were easy to follow then I would honestly have not voted for him. It's like a vote for reason. As it stands I won't be changing my vote for this day phase but I admit it was too hasty. I think it should be emphasised that any one of us voting for gabe could be mafia too (or people voting off infund for that matter) and with 31 players it won't be that hard to get gabe out of the hot water if we want to keep him. On December 11 2010 22:51 Brocket wrote: ##unvote gabriel ##vote kenpachi herpdederp.. If you look, you'll notice the 1st post was made on the 10th, the second post on the 11th. I said "as it stands". There has been a lot of discussion between both days and it changed my opinion. Get with the program dude. And I said Gabriel's outbursts in the first few hours wasn't as bad as some of the others I've read since. I don't know what you're seeing but if you read your post again and exclude your obnoxious comments it follows a logical order. Also you omitted some other posts in between too to help take them out of context . Please, please analyse what I say more. It's very entertaining since I haven't received so much attention before. So thanks for that, although your comments are rubbish. And if you don't like my "newbie card" deal with it. I'm sub 100 posts but I can tell when people are being condescending because of their enormous e-peen. Cool cool?

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 13 2010 00:04 GMT #514 @ LSB: Honestly the zeks/kenpachi arguments were pretty solid. Gabriel just came off as inconsistent and a little hard to follow but not as bad. The arguments against gabriel weren't as good as I first thought hence my change in vote. I'm a little suss of everybody because I don't know you well enough to see tells. This is my first time playing mafia in a forum and since I can't see your facial expressions I'm not very used to reading into every post to the letter so my general perception to tell who's scum is poor. The only thing I actively know how to do competently is to pay attention to people defending themselves from suspicion (and I'm one of those people) which usually ends in deflecting attention onto someone else or just saying they don't care/have nothing to hide. I'm more of the latter type. If I do see something strange I will say so even if it sounds like I 'contributed nothing' by repeating what got said already.

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 13 2010 08:15 GMT #538 I was reading through the roles again. I get why there was only voltorb because electrode only gets to place 1 voltorb per night or switches 1 voltorb per night (not both). But what seems odd to me is the rule that if mew is checked by alakazam, mew will appear as alakazam. What's the point of that if there is only 1 alakazam in the game? I kind of get that gengar can appear as alakazam too. I guess that's a given that gengar will always choose to apper as alakazam.. to appear as mew? Honestly I would have just made it mew appears as mew, and gengar can appear as mew.

Brocket Australia192 Posts December 13 2010 09:48 GMT #544 He's funny and scary at the same time. Tree hugger was an obvious choice for mafia to hit. Experienced players that dole out helpful advice or substantiated/logical opinions that sway votes need to be removed from the game so the townies become less productive. I don't know about the other two, I guess since kenpachi was a town then it followed that jcarl was town which confuses me as to why mafia would hit him (ken and jcarl were buddying up on gabe early day 1). Also I'm not a smurf. DoctorHelvectica can attest to that because I haven't sent him a PM like smurfs are meant to. Didn't he explicitly ask smurfs to tell him so? So my q's are both silly and genuine. When you said that my q 'the mafia know who eachother are right?' was too silly, it was meant to be rhetorical. As in, if Kenpachi knew that mafia's already knew each other then why would he act like mafia. I honestly still don't understand why he acted the way he did unless he wanted to act out for the lols and attention and get voted asap.

1 2 3 4 Next All

Please log in or register to reply.