EPTTL Mafia XXVIII
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On July 17 2010 11:32 Pandain wrote: Vote: Pandain 4. You cannot vote for yourself or anyone dead or outside the game. | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
and i would think in any mafia game ever you're not allowed to edit | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On July 18 2010 04:30 Pandain wrote: So how do we know whos mafia? well personally i just use my mafia detecting hacks, you should probably read through a previous game or something if you have no idea what is going on | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
So the only way to get substance out of these people is to call them out and pressure vote them. | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
 | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On July 18 2010 06:20 BloodyC0bbler wrote: You then still have to decide who RNG's the name off said list, but not a bad idea. Also gives a better chance at hitting a red. well since you cant trust any one person to use a rng maybe we could get a bunch of people to use one and whoever gets the most votes randomly generated on them? lol i dont know how much different that would be from just normally voting or if the reds could influence that just the same but yeah. | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On July 18 2010 08:03 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: RNG lynch is dumb because you have more of a chance to land on a townie, and then he could be a helpful townie. if we lynch an inactive we're killing someone who probably would not have helped us anyway however, i don't want to lynch someone that would just get modkilled since that's obviously a waste. Bill, how many votes can someone miss before they get zapped? you can only miss one vote then you diez | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On July 18 2010 10:13 SiNiquity wrote: :rolleyes: inactive jumps into the game [after a mafia PM'd him to start posting and get off the inactive list, mm?], says nothing, and votes to kill a contributor. I'm not sure I like it. The inactives will get modkilled, no one gets lynched, the mafia kills 2 more people, and then we're back at square one, no? seeing as we're going on no information the odds arent in towns favour to hit a random person without any information to back that hit. The reds are going to kill 2 town anyways, might as well not give them good odds of getting another one for free. ##vote abstain | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On July 18 2010 10:43 Misder wrote: ##Vote: hyperbola Sketchy to me. He says hes active, but says he only posted because he does want to be killed. And hyperbola's reason to lynch SiNiquity is horrible lol. I was actually going to abstain, but hyperbola's post annoyed me lol. I actually have to really agree now that this has been pointed out. This is his first and only post, and it is posted in a manner to perhaps put himself just above the threshold of inactivity. And he then votes for someone for contributing and trying to help the town too much. Not to mention the post he's quoting as his 'reason' for voting is the very one that points out his own activity. Perhaps we can then put some more pressure on his inactive ass to give us any more substance. ##unvote ##vote hyperbola | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On July 18 2010 12:30 tree.hugger wrote: And this bandwagon against Hyperbola is just dumb. ## Vote Laxercannon why is it dumb | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On July 18 2010 13:45 tree.hugger wrote: The reason it was introduced in the first place what completely ridiculous. Nothing smart about any of it. We should lynch people for good reasons, not dumb ones. I'm still looking for more nominations for people to lynch. I think those three are a good start. Time to pick one, yes? How about I PM five people a list of the candidates in order, and then someone in the thread will choose a number from 1-3? but WHY was it ridiculous, WHY was it not smart, WHY were the reasons dumb. You might as well have not posted as there was no substance to what you just said | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
I dont feel he really defended himself well at all | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
sure it could likely be a bad townie just throwing around baseless accusations but it could also be a retarded red just doing something without thinking. So im kinda worried that either BC doesnt know how to read or he's playing very sketchy to me and overly defending someone with two posts who has made them both pretty poorly? and then tree hugger goes on again to say we had no reason blah blah i could say we have a reason and look i didnt post any substance either. i gave valid justification for my vote, which has probably more backing than most votes in this thread. He's the best target for me since he's been just active enough to be considered not inactive and his initial posts were retarded, i usually find that to be good enough for the RVS. i think that even if he ends up town based on the quality and lack of his posts so far it'd be better for town if he died anyway, i havent seen to much in the light of better candidates yet but when you guys vote for people ill be sure to not quote the reason and say you had no reason too  | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On July 19 2010 01:33 Pandain wrote: Well I think BC is just being cautios, that's all. I mean he did bring up a good point(intentionally or unintentionally) in that Opz could very well be more mafia-esque than Hyperbola. However, now one of the reasons I am sticking with Hyperbola is that I don't want Darth hanged lol i agree with the sentiment. It just irritates me when people blatantly demonstrate they havent read the thread. Unless they are saying my reasons are so poor they might as well be no reasons! Which i firmly dont believe, especially in the RVS like what the fuck, how sure can you be of anything with such little information? the thing with opz is at least he is posting, it is clear we will be able to get plenty out of him. So it will become clearer as time goes on if we can get useful analysis out of him. Hyperbola straight up told me he's 'quiet' which is NO good in a game like this. So i think that's more than enough reason to pile on top of what already was said to make him more red like to me for today. unless he actually comes out and starts posting more which is really what im hoping for | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On July 19 2010 02:06 Hyperbola wrote: Alright guys take a breather... sheesh. Especially you Divinek: You seem pretty adamant about accusing me for like a quick post I made a while back. Look dude, I'll spill the beans, my post against Sinequity wasn't serious. I still can't believe you haven't caught on to that by now. I accuse him for making a long post just for fun and I also didn't feel like abstaining. I also like being quiet and examining things behind the lines. What you're gonna crucify me every game for not posting often? I'm keeping my vote on Sinequity as a placeholder, mmkay? cool. You realize it can be hard to interpret jokes through text, and my first assumption is to assume you're retarded cause that is often the safer assumption based on the vast populace of the internet. And you're damn right im going to crucify you for not posting often! how else will people get any info. Place holder votes are also lol when half the time they always seem to stay on that placeholder... | ||
| ||
