• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:06
CEST 18:06
KST 01:06
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters9[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 244
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism8Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?123Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over3New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!46
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism SC4ALL: II Winner will earn a spot at HSC 30! SC4ALL II: StarCraft 2 Player Announcement 7/8 Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) 2026 GSTL Announcement Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 540 Dodge This
Brood War
General
Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon? [D] Brainstorming a balance patch for Brood war Terran or Protoss BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3 [ASL22] Ro16 Group B [ASL22] Ro16 Group A BWCL Season 65 Announcement
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread EVE Corporation Diablo IV [Maplestory Hardcore] Let's Play~!! General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Virtual Romance, Real-Life C…
TrAiDoS
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7419 users

Scouting vs. Random analysis

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 Next All
Oracle
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Canada411 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-10 01:19:12
April 20 2010 20:49 GMT
#1
Preamble:

As far as the search goes, there hasn't been a clear answer to this question: when do I scout against random?

I provide here a small analysis which, not necessarily says anything groundbreaking, but shows the implications in terms of mineral advantage when you scout.
Note: for these calculations we assume that the random player scouts after 10

Proof:
+ Show Spoiler +

Scenario: You send one of your first 6 SCVs to scout

Let us assume that for the first 10~ scvs, your mineral income per minute per scv can be represented as this:

g(n) = k*n

where k is an arbitrary value of the average income each scv makes per second. depending on the type of speed you play SC on, it is around 2/3.

Of course, as soon you add in more than 10 scvs, this function needs a piecewise-representation, as the return diminishes the more scvs you have. Furthermore, this function assumes there is a linear relationship of the amount of minerals recieved for the first 10 scvs, which does create a margin of error, but it is not that bad.

Thus, we say that:

[image loading]


Now, when you scout, you are effectively down by one scv, let us define the income of the opponent as

[image loading]


If we assume that both players continuously pump scvs for the first 10 supply, we can say that the number of SCVs with respect to time (in minutes) can be modelled by the function:

[image loading]


That is to say, number of SCVs for the first 100 seconds of the game can be calculated by floor(time / 20).
Because it takes 20 seconds to build an scv. I put a restriction of 100 seconds because in 100 seconds 5 scvs are produced, which brings our total count of SCVs to 11. However, one will be surely sent to build a structure by then, which fulfills our restriction of a maximum of 10 scvs mining the minerals at a time.

which we can substitute:

[image loading]


Now that we have the rate of income at time t of each player, we can integrate and find the total amount of money each player has gotten (from the new scvs), with respect to time

Thus now we can approximate the accumlated minerals gathered (by the new scvs) for the first 100 seconds can be modelled like this for each player.

[image loading]



We can find the advantage of Player 1's total minerals over Player 2's total minerals if player two starts off with 1 less scv (scout) by

[image loading]


If we plot this graph, we can see how big of an advantage, that your opponent has over you, if you sent one of your first 6 SCVs out right away. For these plots we will assume K = 4/6 minerals per second

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Thus if player two sends one of his initial six scvs to scout, by the 100 second mark, player one will have a 200/3 mineral advantage over player one.

This indeed makes sense, seeing as if the opponent has an extra scv over me for 100 seconds, and the scv gains an average of 4/6 minerals a second, he should have 4/6 * 100 minerals over me. This case is proven true.

But now we want to know, what happens if I send the 7th scv instead of the 6th? Or the 8th? Or the 9th?

Then we can model MY income by:

[image loading]


Where x is the time for which I sent my scouting SCV out. If it my 7th SCV, this is 20 seconds into the game. 8th SCV, 40 seconds in. Etc.

This makes sense because my income and my opponents income are exactly the same (note the f(x) part) up until i send my scout out (at time x). Then my mineral income diverges from my opponents, and I have the g(t) function which implies i have 1 less scv thereafter.

This creates the relationship of my total gathered minerals versus the total gathered minerals of my opponent. obviously, the later i send my scout out, the closer my mineral income is to his:

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Now for the real stuff; I want to know 100 seconds in, how much each of these options costs me, so I can draw some sort of application.

My opponents final income will always be the best case scenario, lets say f(100) in this case. I want to know how much greater his income will be over me depending on when I send my SCV scout out.

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


There you have it; If i send one of my first 6 SCV scouts i will be at a defecit of 200/3 minerals by the 100 second mark. And so on...



Observations:
This creates the table:

[image loading]

From the 100 second point and onwards, my opponent suffers diminishing returns, and thus his advantage will slowly converge to zero.

Note: this is assuming your opponent does NOT send a scout until at least 11 scvs have been produced. (Which is usually the case when you play vs random)


personally, since im terran, scouting at 7 catches two bases before I decide whether or not i want to tech/mass/FE. At a loss of 40 minerals, doesnt seem like a bad idea.

More implications:

Question:
On April 21 2010 06:35 puckthecat wrote:
The key with this will be how it affects your gathering enough minerals to make essential early structures and still maintain constant worker production. If you have to delay or cut a worker in order to make a Depot or Barracks, the ultimate costs will be more significant than what's shown above.

Proof:

+ Show Spoiler +
Lets say we don't scout until after 10;

80 seconds in you have made 4 scvs, which brings you to a total of 10. You start with 50 minerals. 4 Scvs also cost 50 minerals each. By the time your 10th scv is out, you have gained f(80) minerals.

Thus, how much minerals you have when your 10th SCV comes out is:

f(80) + 50 - 50*4 = 350/3 = 117


This means, under optimal conditions, as soon as your 10th SCV pops out, you should have 117 minerals ready to spend on the first supply depot. I can spare 17 minerals without losing any efficiency.

So if i decide to scout at 6, when my 10th scv comes out, I will have this many minerals:

b(0,80) + 50 - 4*50 = 190/3 or 64 minerals.
Thus, I am behind by 36 minerals to making my supply depot.

Currently, I have 9 SCVs mining. If my rate of income is g(t) = [(2/3)*t]*9, and g(t) = 36, then t must be 6 seconds.

I will have to wait 6 extra seconds to make my supply depot if i scout on 6.

Similarily, we can continue this for every individual variable for which SCV scout was sent.


This creates the following table:

[image loading]
nedsat
Profile Joined April 2010
27 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-20 21:03:25
April 20 2010 21:02 GMT
#2
Good reading. You did a fine job sir.
I would have thought you would lose more scouting already at 7-8.
Sentient
Profile Joined April 2010
United States437 Posts
April 20 2010 21:14 GMT
#3
Thank you, this is very useful. I'm always hesitant to send an early scout, but it seems the cost isn't as much as I thought it was.
puckthecat
Profile Joined April 2010
United States18 Posts
April 20 2010 21:35 GMT
#4
The key with this will be how it affects your gathering enough minerals to make essential early structures and still maintain constant worker production. If you have to delay or cut a worker in order to make a Depot or Barracks, the ultimate costs will be more significant than what's shown above.
Clearout
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Norway1060 Posts
April 20 2010 21:48 GMT
#5
Wow well done
really?
Oracle
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Canada411 Posts
April 20 2010 21:49 GMT
#6
On April 21 2010 06:35 puckthecat wrote:
The key with this will be how it affects your gathering enough minerals to make essential early structures and still maintain constant worker production. If you have to delay or cut a worker in order to make a Depot or Barracks, the ultimate costs will be more significant than what's shown above.


Very keen observation
Lets say we don't scout until after 10;

80 seconds in you have made 4 scvs, which brings you to a total of 10. You start with 50 minerals. 4 Scvs also cost 50 minerals each. By the time your 10th scv is out, you have gained f(80) minerals.

Thus, how much minerals you have when your 10th SCV comes out is:

f(80) + 50 - 50*4 = 350/3 = 117


This means, under optimal conditions, as soon as your 10th SCV pops out, you should have 117 minerals ready to spend on the first supply depot. I can spare 17 minerals without losing any efficiency.

So if i decide to scout at 6, when my 10th scv comes out, I will have this many minerals:

b(0,80) + 50 - 4*50 = 190/3 or 64 minerals.
I am behind by 36 minerals to making my supply depot. Currently, I have 9 SCVs mining. If my rate of income is g(t) = 2/3*t/9, and g(t) = 36, then t must be 6 seconds.

I will have to wait 6 extra seconds to make my supply depot if i scout on 6.
Stopdroproll
Profile Joined March 2010
United States101 Posts
April 20 2010 22:13 GMT
#7
Very interesting, I've always wondered how early scouting can affect minerals mining.
But at what cost?
mOnion
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States5657 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-20 22:18:50
April 20 2010 22:16 GMT
#8
awwwww I LOVE all these math wizards who are figuring all this shit out!

great read! ^__^

this is actually more interesting for scouting against players who's race you know, because then you have more of an emphasis on your economy as you already know what race your opponent is

but for random players you wanna see what you're up against asap even if it means sacking some econ.
☆★☆ 7486!!! Join the Ban mOnion Anti-Trolling Initiative! - Caller | "on a scale of machine to 10, how bad is that Zerg?" - LZgamer | you are the new tl.net bonjwa monion, congrats - Rekrul | "Cheeseburgers dynamite lilacs" - Chill
DrSmoke
Profile Joined April 2010
United States175 Posts
April 20 2010 22:18 GMT
#9
Wow holy math batman!

"The more you know..."
Osmoses
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
Sweden5302 Posts
April 20 2010 22:19 GMT
#10
Just thought I'd drop in and let you know the thread title reads "Scouting vs. Random anal" in the menu bar. Other then that, I think this information is pretty interesting, I've often found myself scewing up my builds because I forgot what race I was playing against and had to early scout.

Carry on.
Excuse me hun, but what is your name? Vivian? I woke up next to you naked and, uh, did we, um?
Oracle
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Canada411 Posts
April 20 2010 23:06 GMT
#11
On April 21 2010 07:19 Osmoses wrote:
Just thought I'd drop in and let you know the thread title reads "Scouting vs. Random anal" in the menu bar. Other then that, I think this information is pretty interesting, I've often found myself scewing up my builds because I forgot what race I was playing against and had to early scout.

Carry on.


Lol youre right

If i could edit the threads name I would, its not even named well :x
Been in a rush to move out, just jotted stuff down asap.
Husky
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3362 Posts
April 20 2010 23:08 GMT
#12
I never scout that early against random. Then again I'm really bad.

+ Show Spoiler +
I love random anal
Commentaries: youtube.com/HuskyStarcraft
No_Roo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States905 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-21 00:20:58
April 20 2010 23:39 GMT
#13
Haha, yes this was some tragic thread title truncation, was going to screenshot it on the main page but looks like every one else already noticed it.

Good thread though, nice to see the numbers.


EDIT: Reminds me of a programming class I had to take last year...
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
(US) NoRoo.fighting
junemermaid
Profile Joined September 2006
United States981 Posts
April 20 2010 23:47 GMT
#14
Don't want to be a debbie downer here, but you didn't need integrals and fancy equations to figure this out...

Regardless, cool implications and well done.
the UMP says YER OUT
zomgzergrush
Profile Joined August 2008
United States923 Posts
April 20 2010 23:53 GMT
#15
Nice read, but how does map specifics play into this? 1v1 maps, 4p maps, various scouting path distances, etc?
Bronze skipping straight to Diamond in 40 games retail release. Bnet 2.0 ladder really takes it's sweet time to think about that league placement.
Oracle
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Canada411 Posts
April 21 2010 00:15 GMT
#16
On April 21 2010 08:47 junemermaid wrote:
Don't want to be a debbie downer here, but you didn't need integrals and fancy equations to figure this out...

Regardless, cool implications and well done.

yeah there would be a couple ways.

the "easiest" would probably be empirical data, but a 30 minute write-up along with half an hour of testing would take much longer than just a 30 minute write-up

another way you can do it is by using differential equations, but thats more advanced than just integration, especially with floor calls

I realize i made it seem very complicated, truth is its just one small integration problem, then using relations between the functions to get what you want. im bad at writeups when im in a hurry.

Don't really know another way i could've made these conclusions without using these methods.

I chose my method because I thought itd be the easiest to express, and this way we get pretty graphs where we can pinpoint things and see relations

not to mention, by using functions its easier (at least for me) to see some of the connections

either way, thanks ^^
Chronopolis
Profile Joined April 2009
Canada1484 Posts
April 21 2010 00:32 GMT
#17
The word Analaysis has turned to anal in the sidebar countless times lol. @ the OP, while the mineral loss for early scout is small @ 100 seconds, if it delays a key building it will slow down the entire build by that much.
Oracle
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Canada411 Posts
April 21 2010 23:00 GMT
#18
All done moving...

Anyways, since i dont have the SC2 beta, it would be great if someone could give me some of the following information so i can make more conclusions:

Time it takes to scout each base on a map,
Ie. On lost temple, scouting close would take X time,
scouting second closest would be Y time
Scouting across would be Z time

etc.

I would also like to know for three player and two player maps (if they exist)



Erucious
Profile Joined March 2010
Norway393 Posts
April 21 2010 23:14 GMT
#19
i didnt read it all... But the math in this thread just got me REALLY hard.

<3
I'm Norwegian/Dutch. Just the awesome parts of them though :D
Amazn
Profile Joined March 2010
United States83 Posts
April 21 2010 23:32 GMT
#20
You baneling busted by brain
Let fear be your compass.
1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 6h 24m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
BRAT_OK 87
mouzHeroMarine 50
Trap 25
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 35796
Shuttle 1791
Mini 871
Soulkey 585
EffOrt 576
Soma 384
Horang2 318
Rush 265
hero 108
Dewaltoss 107
[ Show more ]
firebathero 97
910 58
Pusan 54
Mong 32
Sexy 24
Terrorterran 15
sorry 14
scan(afreeca) 7
Dota 2
qojqva4305
Dendi1717
420jenkins327
Counter-Strike
byalli1376
pashabiceps847
ScreaM688
x6flipin512
Other Games
singsing1828
Liquid`RaSZi1049
FrodaN690
mouzStarbuck361
crisheroes350
XaKoH 144
ArmadaUGS93
RotterdaM91
uThermal90
Beastyqt70
KnowMe68
Trikslyr46
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• mYiSmile141
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 24
• Azhi_Dahaki2
• FirePhoenix2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis3228
• TFBlade1091
Other Games
• Shiphtur171
Upcoming Events
OSC
6h 24m
Escore
17h 54m
IntoTheTV X SOOP
18h 54m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 17h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
2 days
Spirit vs Mixu
Clem vs TBD
RSL Revival
2 days
Serral vs Rogue
BlizzCon
3 days
IdrA vs MC
Replay Cast
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Weekly
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
GSL
4 days
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-08
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - TRS
RSL Revival: Season 6
Calamity Invitational
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: King of Kings
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.