EPT
TL Mafia XXVIII - Page 43
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Subversion
South Africa3627 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
5]BrownBear (Divinek, Amber[LighT], ~OpZ~, rastaban, Tricode) *note, rastaban wrote Vote BrownBear in Bold but didn't have ## in front, does that count? 5]Subversion (tree.hugger, bumatlarge, DarthThienAn, Jayme, chaoser) 6]DarthThienAn (d3_crescentia, Pyrrhuloxia, Misder, XeliN, zeks, Subversion) 3]chaoser (Pandain, youngminii, SouthRawrea) 3]Abstain (BrownBear, LaXerCannon, SiNiquity) People Yet to Vote: lakrismamma, Infundibulum, BloodyC0bbler, Citi.zen, protactinium, roffles Double Lunch iNfuNdiBuLuM | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
Vote Count: 6] DarthThienAn (d3_crescentia, misder, Pyrrhuloxia, XeliN, zeks, Subversion) 5] Subversion (tree.hugger, bumatlarge, darththienan, jayme) 5] Brownbear (Divinek, amber[LighT], tricode, ~opz~) 2] chaoser (pandain, youngminii) Abstain: (brownbear, chaoser, SiNiquity) not voting and in risk of modkill: iNfuNdiBuLuM, lakrismamma, rastaban, SouthRawrea, LaxerCannon, BloodyC0bbler, Citi.zen, protactinium, Roffles double lynch: 1/15 iNfuNdiBuLuM | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
i'm going to bed. don't kill each other while i'm gone | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
| ||
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
As for BrownBear, I dunno really. His defense arguments seem townie enough, but I'm still wary of his vote, read, then no change on the vote tactic from Day 1. Aside from DTA's antics, I think we're on the wrong path here, but that's just a hunch. | ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
On July 21 2010 01:59 rastaban wrote: vote BrownBear The mafia are in bad shape, screwing up and only getting 1 hit night one probably has them worried. Town still has 2 medics and vets so the best thing that could happen is for them is to narrow down who the vets are. Mafia still has the suicide bomber as well so role claiming is going to remain a terrible idea until we can lynch him since he can take out the person and the medic protecting him. Remember BrownBear was nearly modkilled but got back in time. If I was to guess it seems that BB has become too busy to play, the mafia could have decided that since he looks like he is going to be lynched, and would possibly be modkilled use him draw out any blues possible. So as was said a little above, what ever you do DON'T ROLECLAIM EVEN IF YOU ARE A VET. If you look at the posting records, BB had a lot of people already thinking about lynching him for the inactivity and bad play day 1, after this he starts demanding roleclaims for vets, it just seems desperate. If it is due to the lack of hash marks the OP makes no mention of it and basically says any format is valid: 2. You must clearly declare your vote ie: 'I vote for X'. "vote: name" whatever. bold it. I don't think we should go for a double vote yet, it will work best for us if we save it until later in the game when needed or at least until we have DT's confirming roles. As for my vote, I still like BB for this one though Darth is action's are starting make me wonder. For the time being I will keep my vote here and my eyes on Darth. P.S. Grats Qatol, now tell me how I am suppose to pronounce that name | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
|
citi.zen
2509 Posts
On July 21 2010 20:33 zeks wrote: Since I didn't bold and my vote didn't count: ##Vote DarthThienAn Oh yeah, thanks for reminding me a bout that post. ## vote zeks | ||
|
citi.zen
2509 Posts
| ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
On July 21 2010 12:38 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: #vote for double lynch i'm not convinced about any of the lynch candidates so far, so i'll wait on that. Just wanted to clarify why we should NOT double lynch. Right now we still are not so sure on our leads, we want to have more evidence before pulling out the big guns like this. If both were townies we could really end up shooting ourselves in the foot., It is far more effective once we have some knowledge from the DTs, so if they have some lists when revealed we can target groups of them if needed. Lets wait for some more DT checks before we consider using this, so far we have only had 1 night of checks. We have only had 2 deaths total so we are in a good position and should avoid hasty maneuvers like this. | ||
|
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
Re: DTA - I should thank pyrr for doing a really thorough analysis here. I do think it's possible the mafia took that gambit of not killing DTA to make him appear more red (see Foolish's quote... "if the mafia don't kill you tonight you're red" [that was paraphrased]). So, I want to see how he responds to Pyrr's accusation before I decide if I want to vote for him. The pressures pretty strong already. ANd i gotta say i'm all but convinced on this one. On July 21 2010 14:27 youngminii wrote: My suspicion on infindouwioej4l5k23wtgjfxvpcohinkium is still here, it's just a lot smaller than everything else going on right now. It's "Infundibulum." | ||
|
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On July 21 2010 23:19 Roffles wrote: Yawn, just gonna pitch in my two liner here and say that Subversion's slip up doesn't really strike me as a real mafia slip up, just a minor error by a newbie. As for BrownBear, I dunno really. His defense arguments seem townie enough, but I'm still wary of his vote, read, then no change on the vote tactic from Day 1. Aside from DTA's antics, I think we're on the wrong path here, but that's just a hunch. You know i agree with this, but people have been saying these exact same things for several pages now... | ||
|
Misder
United States1557 Posts
On July 21 2010 13:01 chaoser wrote: On July 21 2010 05:49 chaoser wrote: Does anyone know when day is ending? Tomorrow at 12? So far the votes have been Divinek votes for BrownBear at 13:59 DarthThienAn votes Divinek at 13.59 tree.hugger votes Subversion at 14:03 DarthThienAn unvotes Divinek, votes BrownBear at 14:34 d3_crescentia votes DarthThienAn at 14:50 Amber[LighT] votes BrownBear at 22:15 bumatlarge votes DarthThienAn at 22:59 ~OpZ~ votes BrownBear at 1:01 rastaban votes BrownBear at 1:59 Misder votes DarthThienAn at 3:18 Tricode votes BrownBear at 4:02 Pyrrhuloxia votes DarthThienAn at 4:57 bumatlarge unvotes DarthThienAn, votes Subversion at 5:25 DarthThienAn unvotes BrownBear, votes Subversion at 5:30 NEW VOTES: chaoser votes Subversion at 6:02 BrownBear abstains at 6:52 Pandain votes chaoser at 6:53 Jayme votes Subversion at 8:20 youngminii votes chaoser at 8:32 chaoser unvotes, abstains at 9:25 LaXerCannon abstains at 9:27 SouthRawrea votes for chaoser at 11:19 chaoser votes for Subversion at 12:34 hmm, let's test something. this is either going to bite me in the ass or go very well for me ##vote Subversion End result: BrownBear - 5 (Divinek, Amber[LighT], ~OpZ~, rastaban, Tricode) Subversion - 5 (tree.hugger, DarthThienAn, bumatlarge, Jayme, chaoser) DarthThienAn - 3 (d3_crescentia, Misder, Pyrrhuloxia) chaoser - 3 (Pandain, youngminii, SouthRawrea) abstain - 2 (BrownBear, LaXerCannon) People yet to vote: xelin, SiNiquity, lakrismamma, Infundibulum, Subversion, BloodyC0bbler, Citi.zen, zeks, protactinium, roffles Chaoser won't tell us what he is experimenting. Here's what I think he is doing. Remember subversion's post? + Show Spoiler + On July 21 2010 09:09 Subversion wrote: THANK YOU fucking hell. I played in ONE NIGHT of harry potter mafia, I got temp banned for some stupid joke and got replaced  This is my first game ffs, I didn't realise what I said would make it "oh gg, he's mafia lol, what a fkn moron". I was trying to be useful Seems like everyone is jumping on my voting bandwagon, I get what I said was stupid now, although I still don't really understand why its a fucknormous mistake. I was simply stating what to me, was a fairly obvious fact. It was kind of a justification for my vote to be honest. I didn't see any major mistakes, I didn't have anyone I felt REALLY deserved a vote, but I didn't wanna abstain and I thought Hyperbola was fucked anyway. So I read what he said and what others said, there didn't really seem like any better choice, so I just voted for him. Like I said, I didn't really think my vote mattered much anyway. I also had Bill up my ass saying I was gonna be modkilled if I didn't vote! I really don't want to be voted out here, I don't want to roleclaim either, but I can if necessary?? I think that chaoser is trying to get subversion to roleclaim. He voted for subversion to pressure subversion to roleclaim to defend himself. Do not roleclaim yet. This makes me very very suspicious of chaoser. I may be completely paranoid, but its scummy to me. ##Unvote DarthThienAn Vote chaoser | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
##Vote: Subversion Though I think BrownBear's analysis and plan is crappy, we can get more info is we lynch Subversion. Lynching BB just proves that we, as a town, aren't as organized as we would like to be. The Subversion discussion caught a lot of players, many more than the BB discussion. By determining Subversion's role we can pinpoint other key players who were pushing for and against the Subversion lynch. I'm willing to risk putting my name into the hat to get the town on a better path to victory. Depending on the flip, the DT's should try and look at key players involved in the Subversion dispute. | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
hungover fml -_- | ||
|
Misder
United States1557 Posts
On July 21 2010 23:48 citi.zen wrote: Oh, I could also be persuaded to vote for misder if you guys like him more than zeks. Uh... Is there a reason why I'm under suspicion? If there is, what is it? | ||
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
On July 22 2010 01:34 Amber[LighT] wrote: Unvote BrownBear ##Vote: Subversion Though I think BrownBear's analysis and plan is crappy, we can get more info is we lynch Subversion. Lynching BB just proves that we, as a town, aren't as organized as we would like to be. The Subversion discussion caught a lot of players, many more than the BB discussion. By determining Subversion's role we can pinpoint other key players who were pushing for and against the Subversion lynch. I'm willing to risk putting my name into the hat to get the town on a better path to victory. Depending on the flip, the DT's should try and look at key players involved in the Subversion dispute. Nah, I legitimately think Subversion is just a newbie who made a dumb mistake. He made a stupid blunder the last game he played, and ended up getting modkilled. However, him pulling out the newbie card himself is an alarming point to possibly take suspicion off him. Once again, I think we're going in the wrong direction. | ||
| ||
