EPTNewbie Mini Mafia XVIII - Page 26
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
JieXian
Malaysia4677 Posts
| ||
monk
United States8477 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On June 30 2012 15:32 Keirathi wrote: Maybe a bit premature, but is no-lynch possible in this setup at all? Say we get a unanimous no-lynch vote, can we end the day early? You may all vote for a no-lynch, but it would still take 48 hours | ||
|
JieXian
Malaysia4677 Posts
On July 01 2012 01:44 kitaman27 wrote: You may all vote for a no-lynch, but it would still take 48 hours Ok Keraithi why would you want that | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
8 people left: if we lynch a townie (5/8 chance), then mafia kills a townie, that leaves us at 6 people with 3 mafia. Game over. If we no-lynch at 8 players: mafia kills an extra townie, but we are at 7 players now. 3/7 chance to get mafia, rather than 3/8. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
I can explain more if necessary. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
All of this is with the assumption that there isn't a doc save tonight. If there is, then disregard everything I'm saying now, and we can discuss things tomorrow. 1) We no-lynch tomorrow, unless there is very, very, VERY solid evidence against someone. I don't mean hunches. I mean nearly concrete evidence. I listed in my previous post why this is beneficial, and it gives us another night of blue roles, if we have any. 2) Assuming we do no-lynch tomorrow, I propose that on the following night, everyone claims their role (and results, if applicable) absolutely as close as possible to the following night ending, preferably with just minutes or seconds to spare, so we don't give the mafia time to change their kill/role targets.. The following day will be do-or-die, so there's no point in holding back information at that point. We HAVE to get it right. I hope everyone at least gives my proposal some serious thought and discussion. I 100% believe its the best course of action for the town if we want to have any chance of winning the game. P.S: If this post is out of line or against the rules, I sincerely apologize. I couldn't find anything against it in the rules post, and I pm'd kitaman but didn't get a response before it was time to post. I saw nRgMonk ask, but no response as well. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
Day Three ![[image loading]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ZLwaeYb_8K4/TycZf3z-SqI/AAAAAAAABRE/zzWWEp0EjWg/s1600/wanted_poster.jpg) The mafia team has stolen the flavor text! $1 Million bounty for its return. MiltonKram the vanilla townie has been killed. You have 48 hours to decide the next lynch. | ||
|
Esspen
Croatia29 Posts
| ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
##Vote: No-Lynch | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
On July 01 2012 09:13 Esspen wrote: I'm confused, why would mafia kill somebody we suspected of being mafia? Wtf? Well, answering that requires that we understand what the scum were thinking. We don't, so all we can do is drive ourselves into a state of paranoia trying to metagame the people who know more than us. The best thing we can do is try to find the case where Milton being dead is beneficial to the scum. Look at his discussions, look at his thought process, look at other people's thought processes about him. Time to dive into the filters and start trying to piece things together, IMO. | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
| ||
|
monk
United States8477 Posts
P.S: If this post is out of line or against the rules, I sincerely apologize. I couldn't find anything against it in the rules post, and I pm'd kitaman but didn't get a response before it was time to post. I saw nRgMonk ask, but no response as well. You really butchered my name. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
Haha, I apologize. I noticed it after I had already posted, but it seems a bit of a waste to double-post just to fix it. It was obvious who I was talking about  | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
On June 30 2012 07:59 Miltonkram wrote: Keirathi, the question doesn't come down to "what does town lose if player X is telling the truth." It comes down to who you think is scum. The fact that you acknowledge that there is a decent case against him but you does not reflect well on your alignment. Here is why I'm voting Vivax over JingleHell: Vivax's play has been incredibly scummy, JingleHell's has not. It's that simple. On June 30 2012 08:02 Miltonkram wrote: EBWOP: "The fact that you acknowledge that there is a decent case against him but you don't vote for him does not reflect well on your alignment." Keirathi, of course, was right in the thick of a lot of the hot points of that mess, and now he's trying to discuss policy when we're in a world of trouble numerically. Milton's other suspicion mentioned at one point... On June 29 2012 10:20 Miltonkram wrote: What do you think of dNa's reasoning for his Esspen vote? Pretty scummy right? Bear in mind, even though yesterday went terribly, Milton was one of the few people really trying to consider the cases, and look at alternatives even after it started exploding. This isn't even a read, this is ONLY Milton's last couple of times saying someone looked scummy, which gives us a place to start looking. After the debacle, I'm going to be as methodical as possible to avoid a town loss because of another OMGUS shouting match. These are only highlights, please read filters and help with this, the last thing we want is for scum to poke and prod us into a horrid bandwagon. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On July 01 2012 09:30 JingleHell wrote: Keirathi, of course, was right in the thick of a lot of the hot points of that mess, and now he's trying to discuss policy when we're in a world of trouble numerically. Not sure if you realize it, but my policy discussion was *BECAUSE* of the numerical trouble we are in. | ||
|
monk
United States8477 Posts
| ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
On July 01 2012 09:34 Keirathi wrote: Not sure if you realize it, but my policy discussion was *BECAUSE* of the numerical trouble we are in. I am aware of that. There's a reason I'm trying to advocate caution, because I agree with that much of what you said. I was just giving us a starting point based on the question of why Milton would be the scum's target. It seemed like leaving the extra consideration out wouldn't help, so I made sure to put a heavy disclaimer on my post instead. The last thing I want is a shouting match again, I just want us to start breaking down posting, working on filters, and "why did Milton die" seemed like a good place to start. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On July 01 2012 09:38 NrGmonk wrote: Am I allowed to use my staff powers to help with this game? You can only use features other users have access to, such as filters  User was warned for this post | ||
| ||
