Kaspersky New Year's StarCraft II Invitational - Page 17
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
MrCon
France29748 Posts
| ||
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
Sadly for Naama he is playing MC who never loses against terran. | ||
MrCon
France29748 Posts
On December 28 2010 09:07 On_Slaught wrote: GSL3 winner v Dreamhack winner. Sadly for Naama he is playing MC who never loses against terran. Yeah, MC is a big favortie here, but Naama can be very surprising and he has a strong vP, usualy biomech based, something we don't see a lot from korean. I think either way we'll have some good game from them. | ||
Zeon0
Austria2995 Posts
| ||
duckland
Poland150 Posts
| ||
mnck
Denmark1518 Posts
| ||
razy
Russian Federation899 Posts
Added group D results and replay pack to the OP post as well as Playoffs grid (under the spoiler). On December 28 2010 09:21 Zeon0 wrote: bo3 or bo5? Check out the grid i've added ^^ Quarters and third place match - bo3, semis - bo5, finals - bo7 | ||
AmiPolizeiFunk
Germany804 Posts
| ||
razy
Russian Federation899 Posts
![]() | ||
Goliath-sc
France44 Posts
I'm not sure he has a strong PvT even if he have beaten Mana in dreamhack | ||
razy
Russian Federation899 Posts
| ||
TheLight
Australia410 Posts
![]() | ||
razy
Russian Federation899 Posts
On December 28 2010 15:38 TheLight wrote: Do the quarterfinals start at 23.00 KST as in the tourney tracker or at 17.00 KST? Don't want to miss this ![]() believe the tourney tracker and the schedule in the OP. The time which is on the grid picture is Moscow GMT+3 forgot to fix that after copy-pasting from gg.ru ^^ | ||
shaunnn
Ireland1230 Posts
strelok>zenio mc>naama mana>ret not really sure about sjow/top game but strelok and mana have been playing too good recently to be beaten imo, and the mc game is kinda a given but it would amazing to see a shock result | ||
Creegz
Canada354 Posts
| ||
razy
Russian Federation899 Posts
On December 28 2010 16:19 Creegz wrote: Little confused...Naama won because him and Abver and him had a series right? The wording threw me off. Also, is it just me or does the terran icon from TL resemble an AT-ST from Star Wars? naama and abver both had 2W1L counts, but because naama won abver in their series he is the one who advances in playoffs. On December 28 2010 03:19 Piski wrote: Well he sorta did x) But I don't know what happened then. I just watched that he won but not that it was only 1-0. Kinda weird if the rules are changed in the middle of the tournament. Though maybe only wins matter. Before this match MaNa was 4-0 and Dimaga 3-3 so if Dimaga wins 2-1 it will go to 5-2 to MaNa and 5-4 to Dimaga. And because it's 5W tie Dimaga would advance because he won their series. sorry for being late about answering this but afaik they started playing the 3rd series before admins actually came in to say that they didn't need to ^^ Changing rules is indeed too bad to do that during the tourney but they didn't do that ![]() actually check post http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=179171¤tpage=17#339 | ||
duckland
Poland150 Posts
when they start ? | ||
razy
Russian Federation899 Posts
On December 28 2010 18:38 duckland wrote: can someone put EU timing for this today? when they start ? man, please, look at my first post, there is a freaking schedule in 4 different timezones >___< Also it will show up if u click on it in the tl calendar... | ||
GG.Lonely
Russian Federation27 Posts
sorry for being late about answering this but afaik they started playing the 3rd series before admins actually came in to say that they didn't need to ^^ Changing rules is indeed too bad to do that during the tourney ![]() Nothing was changed there. Rules say: TIE In case of two or more players have the same win/loss ratio at the end of the group stage the following criteria should be used: 1. Win/loss ratio among tied players 2. Map difference among tied players 3. Overall map difference 4. If all previous criteria haven't determined group winner, a tiebreaker among tied players should be played. All matches for tiebreaker are best of one. So, even if Darkforce would've won against Sjow with a 2-1 score, there was no way to get out of the group for anyone but Sjow because of the 2nd criterion: Sjow would've had +1 map difference, Darkforce +0 and kas -1. | ||
razy
Russian Federation899 Posts
On December 28 2010 18:58 GG.Lonely wrote: Nothing was changed there. Rules say: TIE In case of two or more players have the same win/loss ratio at the end of the group stage the following criteria should be used: 1. Win/loss ratio among tied players 2. Map difference among tied players 3. Overall map difference 4. If all previous criteria haven't determined group winner, a tiebreaker among tied players should be played. All matches for tiebreaker are best of one. So, even if Darkforce would've won against Sjow with a 2-1 score, there was no way to get out of the group for anyone but Sjow because of the 2nd criterion: Sjow would've had +1 map difference, Darkforce +0 and kas -1. i didn't actually say that you've changed the rules O_o Just didn't know the 2nd criteria that's why thought that they've accidentally played 2 last games >_< sorry, my mistake | ||
| ||