|
On November 30 2013 12:26 Rean wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2013 12:19 supersoft wrote:
My draftnumbers will be 1 and 30. I want a hero with KP... Or some kind of protection lol.
I dare you to take my numbers.
If no other townie picks my numbers, i'll either be firstpick, or if some scummer "sacrifices" himself on my numbers, we will both be lastpick.
Can we somehow organize this? I mean next one could be Mig with 2 and 30, then BC 3 and 30, then sandroba 4 and 30 etc.
Does that make sense? Technically I suppose you could, numbers are made public I believe. But good luck getting people to agree it. ##Vote: GravesHis ability serves no purpose to town at all. Is it encouraged to roleplay as the player we were assigned?
same applies for talon. I guess we should just ban out these obvious antitown heros, because lowranked scum will want to take them
|
On November 30 2013 12:26 Rean wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2013 12:19 supersoft wrote:
My draftnumbers will be 1 and 30. I want a hero with KP... Or some kind of protection lol.
I dare you to take my numbers.
If no other townie picks my numbers, i'll either be firstpick, or if some scummer "sacrifices" himself on my numbers, we will both be lastpick.
Can we somehow organize this? I mean next one could be Mig with 2 and 30, then BC 3 and 30, then sandroba 4 and 30 etc.
Does that make sense? Technically I suppose you could, numbers are made public I believe. But good luck getting people to agree it. ##Vote: GravesHis ability serves no purpose to town at all. Is it encouraged to roleplay as the player we were assigned?
Of course!
|
|
|
On November 30 2013 12:40 Mid or Feed wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2013 12:26 Rean wrote:On November 30 2013 12:19 supersoft wrote:
My draftnumbers will be 1 and 30. I want a hero with KP... Or some kind of protection lol.
I dare you to take my numbers.
If no other townie picks my numbers, i'll either be firstpick, or if some scummer "sacrifices" himself on my numbers, we will both be lastpick.
Can we somehow organize this? I mean next one could be Mig with 2 and 30, then BC 3 and 30, then sandroba 4 and 30 etc.
Does that make sense? Technically I suppose you could, numbers are made public I believe. But good luck getting people to agree it. ##Vote: GravesHis ability serves no purpose to town at all. Is it encouraged to roleplay as the player we were assigned? Of course!
In that case, I'd like to declare myself as the best player in the game and you all suck.
|
I actually don't think we should ban champs like Talon.
Yes they might be nice for mafia early on in the game by denying early checks...
But really... if you're playing a scum agenda... you're going to get busted for it.
The same way a Godfather gets busted for it.
It's 100% the same principle.
|
On November 30 2013 12:48 OdinOfPergo wrote:
I actually don't think we should ban champs like Talon.
Yes they might be nice for mafia early on in the game by denying early checks...
But really... if you're playing a scum agenda... you're going to get busted for it.
The same way a Godfather gets busted for it.
It's 100% the same principle.
You're aware that there's no way for us to known that those champs would be picked so we can't just bust them for it?
|
Alright guys... Time to raise me up. I'm definitely going to carry our team. Bans really don't matter whatsoever and I couldn't care less for them. Too bad so many of you are terrible in comparison to how teh awezome bombz I am.
##vote no bans
|
On November 30 2013 12:52 geript wrote:
Alright guys... Time to raise me up. I'm definitely going to carry our team. Bans really don't matter whatsoever and I couldn't care less for them. Too bad so many of you are terrible in comparison to how teh awezome bombz I am.
##vote no bans
You're trash compared to me.
|
On November 30 2013 12:48 OdinOfPergo wrote:
I actually don't think we should ban champs like Talon.
Yes they might be nice for mafia early on in the game by denying early checks...
But really... if you're playing a scum agenda... you're going to get busted for it.
The same way a Godfather gets busted for it.
It's 100% the same principle.
False. More info later.
|
On November 30 2013 12:53 Rean wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2013 12:52 geript wrote:
Alright guys... Time to raise me up. I'm definitely going to carry our team. Bans really don't matter whatsoever and I couldn't care less for them. Too bad so many of you are terrible in comparison to how teh awezome bombz I am.
##vote no bans You're trash compared to me.
Your mommy called. She told you to bitch up already because let's be honest, that's the worst trash talk I've ever seen. Guess you rolled scum.
|
Hello everyone, it's nice to be back. I've made a list of heroes that are pretty useless in the hands of town and pretty strong in the hands of mafia:
Amumu
Evelynn
Graves
Morgana
Nocturne
Shako
Talon
Tryndamere
Yorick
Out of these the 3 I want to face the least are Yorick, because hiding alignment is too powerful and can cause a lot of confusion; Graves because eliminating alignment reversal can make a red check reliable; Tryndamere because of possibility of mass killing.
What do you guys think about it?
|
On November 30 2013 12:51 Rean wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2013 12:48 OdinOfPergo wrote:
I actually don't think we should ban champs like Talon.
Yes they might be nice for mafia early on in the game by denying early checks...
But really... if you're playing a scum agenda... you're going to get busted for it.
The same way a Godfather gets busted for it.
It's 100% the same principle. You're aware that there's no way for us to known that those champs would be picked so we can't just bust them for it?
Yes. But think of a un-themed game. You are not notified that a God father, Roleblocker, etc. is in the game... However you come to realize the fact before all to long usually ye?
I mean I could be wrong but my gut instinct is to ban champs like Ahri, Amumu, Blitz, etc.
Champs that could change the order that towns actions hit.
Champs that could reduce the # of votes (IE specifically Amumu) on a scum vs town Lynch wagon could potentially be catastrophic.
Feel free to discuss. We do have 23 hours..
|
Also we should 100% get rid of Yorick.
Being delayed two phases for flip results is sooooo useful to the mafia.
Yet it's completely useless to town.
Scum know who town are.
Townies benefit from this ability in no way.
Ban this champion.
##Ban: Yorick
|
Amumu is pretty powerful too in the hands of scum, possibly we should consider him instead of tryndamere. It's hard to know tryn's threat level without a noition of damage/hp.
|
I've grown fond of you already odin : )
|
On November 30 2013 12:58 OdinOfPergo wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2013 12:51 Rean wrote:On November 30 2013 12:48 OdinOfPergo wrote:
I actually don't think we should ban champs like Talon.
Yes they might be nice for mafia early on in the game by denying early checks...
But really... if you're playing a scum agenda... you're going to get busted for it.
The same way a Godfather gets busted for it.
It's 100% the same principle. You're aware that there's no way for us to known that those champs would be picked so we can't just bust them for it? Yes. But think of a un-themed game. You are not notified that a God father, Roleblocker, etc. is in the game... However you come to realize the fact before all to long usually ye? I mean I could be wrong but my gut instinct is to ban champs like Ahri, Amumu, Blitz, etc. Champs that could change the order that towns actions hit. Champs that could reduce the # of votes (IE specifically Amumu) on a scum vs town Lynch wagon could potentially be catastrophic. Feel free to discuss. We do have 23 hours..
I get your point yeah, but it's the choice between roles that could be useful for both town and scum and roles that only benefit scum here since we only get three bans, so it seems to me it's better to eliminate champs that will never be useful for town (IMO, Graves + Talon + Yorick)
|
Yo rean I won't be able to post saturday and most of sunday, can I trust you to organize shit to make sure we get the 3 top threats agreed upon and banned instead of each of us voting randomly and ending up with pretty inefficient bans?
|
On November 30 2013 13:05 Rean wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2013 12:58 OdinOfPergo wrote:On November 30 2013 12:51 Rean wrote:On November 30 2013 12:48 OdinOfPergo wrote:
I actually don't think we should ban champs like Talon.
Yes they might be nice for mafia early on in the game by denying early checks...
But really... if you're playing a scum agenda... you're going to get busted for it.
The same way a Godfather gets busted for it.
It's 100% the same principle. You're aware that there's no way for us to known that those champs would be picked so we can't just bust them for it? Yes. But think of a un-themed game. You are not notified that a God father, Roleblocker, etc. is in the game... However you come to realize the fact before all to long usually ye? I mean I could be wrong but my gut instinct is to ban champs like Ahri, Amumu, Blitz, etc. Champs that could change the order that towns actions hit. Champs that could reduce the # of votes (IE specifically Amumu) on a scum vs town Lynch wagon could potentially be catastrophic. Feel free to discuss. We do have 23 hours.. I get your point yeah, but it's the choice between roles that could be useful for both town and scum and roles that only benefit scum here since we only get three bans, so it seems to me it's better to eliminate champs that will never be useful for town (IMO, Graves + Talon + Yorick)
Add Amumu to that list aswell, will almost never be good for town.
|
On November 30 2013 13:10 sandroba wrote:
Yo rean I won't be able to post saturday and most of sunday, can I trust you to organize shit to make sure we get the 3 top threats agreed upon and banned instead of each of us voting randomly and ending up with pretty inefficient bans?
I got this, dw. I'm good at yelling at people until they do as I say. I like yelling at people until they do as I say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
