EPTFor the record, the OP states explicitly that we can post our role PMs. If we wanna go down that road, you guys feel free...but I don't think we need to resort to noob tactics today.
iGrok's Good Clean Old-fashioned Mafia - Page 12
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
For the record, the OP states explicitly that we can post our role PMs. If we wanna go down that road, you guys feel free...but I don't think we need to resort to noob tactics today. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
gonzaw, i think your original "case" on him that he wasn't posting analysis was silly. It's too early in the game to post analysis, the first 24 hours haven't even passed yet. I saw it as you just trying to put pressure on him. The thing that made me suspicious of him was his post about his suspicions of Wiggles I am suspicious of Wiggles. Its not much at the moment, but His major post (which was fairly recent) discusses really nothing that happened recently. He states he is against a RNG lynch, but then says cases where he would be OK with it. Its this kind of indirectness that I don't want to see. while asking Palmar: Im afriad im not following this post, can you point out where MZ failed? when MZ's "fail post" is WAY WORSE than Wiggle's post: On June 11 2012 02:40 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: This post is smart. Unlike RNG, which is dumb and useful for scum seeing as all they need to do is "RNG" someone who already has a couple votes. It leaves no accountability for who gets lynched because everyone will say the same thing "I just RNG'd it." So why suspicion on wiggles and not MZ? | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On June 11 2012 10:12 VisceraEyes wrote: Calm down gonzaw. I gave you my thoughts on Radfield. I'll vote him if I think we can lynch him. Instead of asking me again for my opinions, after I've given them, why don't you tell me if you agree with me on Radfield so I know whether voting for him is going to serve a purpose? For the record, the OP states explicitly that we can post our role PMs. If we wanna go down that road, you guys feel free...but I don't think we need to resort to noob tactics today. I agree that Radfield is not being as cooperative as I'd think (he's saying "It's still too early to come to conclusions" or similar way too much). I don't agree with lynching him now though, I want to lynch Grey @chaoser: Maybe my "initial" case was me being too excited about thinking I easily caught Grey and is not a "case" per se. However, I still refer to the next responses of Grey as the "case" as well (and the points I made), and also the fact that he still hasn't posted any meaningful content yet (apart from those 3 "reads" he made) | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
@chaoser: Maybe my "initial" case was me being too excited about thinking I easily caught Grey and is not a "case" per se. However, I still refer to the next responses of Grey as the "case" as well (and the points I made), and also the fact that he still hasn't posted any meaningful content yet (apart from those 3 "reads" he made) Neither has a vast majority of the people playing? Look at Ace? Look at Brownbear? Especially the latter, he asks for more debate but then doesn't add to said debate. So why are you on greymist for something and not others? Your reasoning leads to a null read right now, not a scum read | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Grey's reaction to gonzaw WAS odd...but admittedly I didn't pick up the intended sarcasm either. | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On June 11 2012 10:34 chaoser wrote: Neither has a vast majority of the people playing? Look at Ace? Look at Brownbear? Especially the latter, he asks for more debate but then doesn't add to said debate. So why are you on greymist for something and not others? Your reasoning leads to a null read right now, not a scum read Grey has posted tons....Ace and BB haven't | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
 Or are you only attacking my accusations of Grey, but you still think Grey is scum? | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
I'm finding BrownBear a little suspicious, only because he was so eager to initiate some conversation here: On June 11 2012 03:39 BrownBear wrote: and radfield, who ninja'd me to a certain extent. so, let's spark some real discussion. chaoser, what do you have against ace this game. question mark goes here. But he never dwelled on that later and never showed up. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
Your accusation that he's not doing any analysis is at 5:56 on June 11. At that time, he had only posted 8 posts since game started. Brownbear had posted 5. I didn't realize 8 posts was "tons". I think Greymist is scummy and I also think your reasoning for voting him is shit. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Mine is equally joking, if not more so. In any case, I am very worried about Ace after rereading. Particularly his post asking for caoser to respond to something someone else said without providing us anything, as well as saying he is down for an RNG lynch and then disappearing without again, giving us anything. Ace has bounced around a bit today without polarizing or giving town anything ##Vote: Ace | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
On June 11 2012 10:12 chaoser wrote: VE, MK, what do you think of greymist's response to gonzaw's "Vanilla Towny"? Both claims are a little strange tbh. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
And your reasoning for voting ace is because "Ace has bounced around a bit today without polarizing or giving town anything"? when that is the exact same reason you gave for being suspicious of Wiggles who hasn't posted anything since then to change your mind? lol. Ok. | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On June 11 2012 11:00 chaoser wrote: Your accusation that he's not doing any analysis is at 5:56 on June 11. At that time, he had only posted 8 posts since game started. Brownbear had posted 5. I didn't realize 8 posts was "tons". I think Greymist is scummy and I also think your reasoning for voting him is shit. Did you read the post I made about him? Grey explicitly said he was eager for analysis; he implicitly said he'd be eager to start making analysis himself (if he wasn't, then that was a contradiction from him and even scummier). BB never said he'd be eager for such, for all I know he's a bored townie that doesn't care shit about anything. Grey wasn't, he was eager to get the game started and post content, but he failed to produce it. On June 11 2012 11:00 GreYMisT wrote: For the record, my reaction had a "haha" after it, Gonzaws had a <_<. Mine is equally joking, if not more so. In any case, I am very worried about Ace after rereading. Particularly his post asking for caoser to respond to something someone else said without providing us anything, as well as saying he is down for an RNG lynch and then disappearing without again, giving us anything. Ace has bounced around a bit today without polarizing or giving town anything ##Vote: Ace Really? Voting Ace? Completely ignoring everything else being discussed at all? Yeah Grey you are scum | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
On June 11 2012 11:00 GreYMisT wrote: For the record, my reaction had a "haha" after it, Gonzaws had a <_<. Mine is equally joking, if not more so. In any case, I am very worried about Ace after rereading. Particularly his post asking for caoser to respond to something someone else said without providing us anything, as well as saying he is down for an RNG lynch and then disappearing without again, giving us anything. Ace has bounced around a bit today without polarizing or giving town anything ##Vote: Ace To those people who are suspicious of Greymist, you guys just gained another member. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
On June 11 2012 11:17 VisceraEyes wrote: MZ what do you think of Radfield? wow read the thread. I outlined my suspicions in a previous post. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
| ||
