Not calling offside and goals are both bad, but goals should always have priority. Offsides, sometimes it can be ignored by human mistake. Goals definately not!
Ukraine vs England - Group D Matchday 3 - Page 12
Forum Index > UEFA Euro 2012 |
[X]Ken_D
United States4650 Posts
Not calling offside and goals are both bad, but goals should always have priority. Offsides, sometimes it can be ignored by human mistake. Goals definately not! | ||
sinii
England989 Posts
On June 20 2012 06:34 [X]Ken_D wrote: Very unfortunate for Ukraine. They played very beautiful today and that uncalled goal was a heart breaker. Not calling offside and goals are both bad, but goals should always have priority. Offsides, sometimes it can be ignored by human mistake. Goals definately not! That makes absolutely no sense at all lol. | ||
sinii
England989 Posts
On June 20 2012 06:31 Maenander wrote: Believe what you will, but I think England's performances just weren't particularly impressive or exciting to the neutral observer. Some nice goals against Sweden and that's about it. It's not just this tournament its been a common theme for years, England battles on while everyone posts on the internet about how much they hate England. Not that I care it's just interesting that we garner so much hate in the world. :p | ||
RvB
Netherlands6195 Posts
On June 20 2012 06:02 sharkie wrote: I have yet to hear a referee say "we need goal line technology" Don't try to make referee look like the victims here, they enjoy their total power and are one of the reasons technology is still being blocked. I'm sure they love the media attacking them with any mistake they make... | ||
Sated
England4983 Posts
| ||
chalice
United States1945 Posts
| ||
sinii
England989 Posts
On June 20 2012 06:47 chalice wrote: i'm not an expert on the concept of karma, can someone explain to me why it would make sense for the ukraine to be karmically punished for a disallowed goal between germany and england in 2010? Karma doesn't make sense, that's why 'Karma's a bitch'. | ||
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
| ||
AzureHath
Bulgaria154 Posts
| ||
Klive5ive
United Kingdom6056 Posts
Now we have 5 idiots (with the 4th official) who make the wrong decisions instead of 3! Football is years behind other sports in management. Bunch of corrupt wankers running every association. Pretty average play from England but that's all you need to win these tournaments (ask Greece). Probably a draw would've been a fairer result but that wouldn't have changed the group anyway. Italy vs England.... it's gonna be a war. | ||
JoelB
Germany311 Posts
On June 20 2012 07:02 Klive5ive wrote: What the hell is the point in that referee? Now we have 5 idiots (with the 4th official) who make the wrong decisions instead of 3! Football is years behind other sports in management. Bunch of corrupt wankers running every association. Pretty average play from England but that's all you need to win these tournaments (ask Greece). Probably a draw would've been a fairer result but that wouldn't have changed the group anyway. Italy vs England.... it's gonna be a war. Yeah ... will go into history as "The Great War of the Walls". Wizards should make a card like this: + Show Spoiler + ![]() | ||
sc4k
United Kingdom5454 Posts
| ||
elagrion
Ukraine422 Posts
On June 20 2012 05:58 sinii wrote: England are just the team people love to hate, I'm pretty used to people slagging off any success England gets it's incredibly rare you see anyone outside of the UK supporting the UK in any of these threads and people will find any reason to berate an England win. Wat? I am supporting any good English football club, except Chelsea, over any other team, except AC Milan and, obviously, Ukrainian teams. Also, in this euro, if England was in any other group I would cheer for them. But in group D its Ukraine (my country) and Sweden (huge amount of Swedish guys in Kyiv, and all of them are so nice, they just won me over ![]() AND 1-1! We played good. | ||
DragoonTT
3398 Posts
On June 20 2012 08:16 sc4k wrote: Wait what's the problem if a movement that was offside resulted in a goal that was disallowed? It gives people a reason to argue - about football, about referees, about the unfairness of life. It provides an excuse for dropping out of the tournament. And it makes for great headlines for the media. | ||
elagrion
Ukraine422 Posts
If you kill a referee, the murder will be called off. Edit: I know I am biased. I can't download reply to see if there was an offside. | ||
blapsd
England121 Posts
On June 20 2012 08:24 elagrion wrote: Wat? I am supporting any good English football club, except Chelsea, over any other team, except AC Milan and, obviously, Ukrainian teams. Also, in this euro, if England was in any other group I would cheer for them. But in group D its Ukraine (my country) and Sweden (huge amount of Swedish guys in Kyiv, and all of them are so nice, they just won me over ![]() AND 1-1! We played good. lol if you're from the country playing us I'd say its forgiveable! Its the majority of "neutrals" that are tiring. They will never realise that too many trophies have been won using this play style for it to just be "luck". Mourinho's Inter, Chelsea this year, Greece 2004 etc. I'm not saying its great to watch but its no worse than tiki-taka which everyone seems to to crazy about lately. Watching players retain the ball just outside the 18 yard box for 60 minutes is hardly my idea of entertainment either. Give me the back and forth style of the Premier League any day. | ||
FindMeInKenya
United States797 Posts
| ||
Candadar
2049 Posts
On June 20 2012 08:38 FindMeInKenya wrote: What a clear robbery!!!! That was an obvious offside...... Gosh!!!! I hate them refs!!! It was actually not so obvious. It's actually very close. It looked like an offside at first glance, but this is another reason we need fucking replay. It was close both on the offside and in the fucking goal. At least from what I've seen. FIFA is too busy taking bribes to notice though, as many would say ![]() | ||
EchoZ
Japan5041 Posts
| ||
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
On June 20 2012 08:16 sc4k wrote: Wait what's the problem if a movement that was offside resulted in a goal that was disallowed? the best bit is that even if the goal had been allowed, england still would of finished top and france still would of come second because head to head and goal difference. | ||
| ||