EPTGreece vs England finals would be REALLY FUNNY.
I dont think Greece and England can be in the final, they are on the same side of the bracket if I remember correctly.
Ukraine vs England - Group D Matchday 3 - Page 13
| Forum Index > UEFA Euro 2012 |
|
Ancient-Hunter
Korea (South)142 Posts
I dont think Greece and England can be in the final, they are on the same side of the bracket if I remember correctly. | ||
|
Candadar
2049 Posts
On June 20 2012 10:10 turdburgler wrote: the best bit is that even if the goal had been allowed, england still would of finished top and france still would of come second because head to head and goal difference. This is silly to think like. There's a major difference of momentum and attitude when you tie a game compared to when you are down 0-1, know you need two to move on and saw your team robbed of a goal. | ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
| ||
|
Reasonable
Ukraine1432 Posts
| ||
|
SixSongs
Poland1455 Posts
| ||
GTR
51698 Posts
| ||
|
KiNGxXx
7928 Posts
On June 20 2012 08:38 FindMeInKenya wrote: What a clear robbery!!!! That was an obvious offside...... Gosh!!!! I hate them refs!!! It was offside! Look at 18 seconds: So please stop talking about robbery and stuff. | ||
|
rjh
United Kingdom8 Posts
Offside. | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
Keep calm and carry on! | ||
|
BlueSpace
Germany2182 Posts
| ||
|
KiNGxXx
7928 Posts
 And we only need cameras to check if it's a goal or not. But please nothing more. No video review like NFL or something. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
Oh well, England is 2012's Greece I guess | ||
|
Shottaz
United Kingdom414 Posts
If the ref wants it, quick replay from '5th' official, yes or no, 10-20 seconds max. How has this not been implemented yet... | ||
|
graan
Germany589 Posts
On June 20 2012 18:41 Shottaz wrote: I'm trying so hard to enjoy football, but the poor decisions really kill it for me. If the ref wants it, quick replay from '5th' official, yes or no, 10-20 seconds max. How has this not been implemented yet... replay for everything would change the hole sport, i can understand they are not realy considering this. but puting two more man on the side which can make the same human mistakes then the other 3 ref already on the pitch - that makes no sense at all, get the goal camera, only for goal or not decisions - thats realy easy to do but those oldtimers at uefa/fifa wont do anything. We can hope they see now that their way to overcome ger-eng from 2010 didnt work and they will get the damn camera. | ||
|
SgtCoDFish
United Kingdom1520 Posts
On June 20 2012 16:12 Reasonable wrote: That second goal made me really fucking angry. If I was on that stadium, I'd beat the shit out of somebody. That's why I don't go to such events. Ukraine still showed a good game, pity they couldn't get another one in. Jesus christ, you'd beat someone up over a football game? Really? Hell, over a goal that was scored after a clear offside? You really struggle to live up to your username by the sounds of it. | ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
On June 20 2012 20:34 graan wrote: replay for everything would change the hole sport, i can understand they are not realy considering this. but puting two more man on the side which can make the same human mistakes then the other 3 ref already on the pitch - that makes no sense at all, get the goal camera, only for goal or not decisions - thats realy easy to do but those oldtimers at uefa/fifa wont do anything. We can hope they see now that their way to overcome ger-eng from 2010 didnt work and they will get the damn camera. the whole argument against replay refs is that it will ruin the flow of the game because of the 1 min delay. but at the moment players spend so long arguing with the ref about every call that it would actually speed things up | ||
|
GarethGore
United Kingdom59 Posts
On the game though, England did alright, Ukraine i think looked the most dangerous team even more so than France did agaisnt them. The "stolen goal" wasn't stolen since he was offside when the ball was played so it shouldn't have even got that far. though that sucks for Ukraine. On the France game Sweden outclassed them all game long. They were so much better at going for it as they had nothing to loose. France just looked bad for so long. | ||
|
CursedRich
United Kingdom737 Posts
On June 20 2012 11:02 Candadar wrote: This is silly to think like. There's a major difference of momentum and attitude when you tie a game compared to when you are down 0-1, know you need two to move on and saw your team robbed of a goal. Its even more silly to think that even if it had been allowed that the game would have changed in some way, truth is you've no idea what would have happened and nor does anyone else, the goal was offside and wasn't awarded, you then play until the next whistle, end of | ||
|
Greg_J
China4409 Posts
On June 20 2012 21:10 GarethGore wrote: It wouldnt ruin the flow it would stop bullshit decisions. It takes maybe 30 secs to watch a clip and be like oh that was offside/was a goal etc then allow it. It would make the game flow quicker as how many games have been destroyed by blatently wrong calls. It takes next to no time to get a replay up and on the big screen the ref could use that to view it. Failing that have a system where they do in rugby where it goes to a different official off field to view the video. Football is one of the only sports that doesnt use technology to aide officials. It has to change asap. On the game though, England did alright, Ukraine i think looked the most dangerous team even more so than France did agaisnt them. The "stolen goal" wasn't stolen since he was offside when the ball was played so it shouldn't have even got that far. though that sucks for Ukraine. On the France game Sweden outclassed them all game long. They were so much better at going for it as they had nothing to loose. France just looked bad for so long. It should be done just like in the cricket for an LBW call. It takes like 20-30 seconds the crowd get to see the replay on the screen so they can talk about it too and the right call will be reached. It wouldn't disrupt the game any more than a substitution. Goal line technology and the current system of having a guy stand there are just not needed. Just go watch the replay and then make the right decision. | ||
|
GarethGore
United Kingdom59 Posts
| ||
| ||
