England vs Sweden - Group D Matchday 2 - Page 15
Forum Index > UEFA Euro 2012 |
JoelB
Germany311 Posts
| ||
Hetairoi
Sweden508 Posts
Hamren is not a well qualified enough to coach a national team. He might just be as bad as Lagerbäck. | ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
On June 16 2012 05:55 Aeroplaneoverthesea wrote: Shitty football but we did play a bit once Milner fucked off and we got Walcott on. Shame we can't drop Glenn Johnsen for Richards but hey ho. 4 points from France/Sweden is a really good result I'd say and now we have Rooney back we should look a lot less useless next game. I just hope he picks Rooney/Welbeck not Rooney/Carroll. Phil Jones is an option as well. He's amazingly versatile so I don't know why he's not played | ||
Sonic Death Monkey
Sweden991 Posts
On June 16 2012 05:52 zul wrote: by now the swedes can be happy the score isn`t already 4:2. england having great chances in the end. Yeah, I'm real hapy we're out of the tournament losing with 3-2 instead of 4-2, it makes all the difference :p | ||
EdouarKiLL
Russian Federation112 Posts
![]() | ||
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On June 16 2012 05:57 JoelB wrote: who ever gets second in this group: you have my pity ... you could as well go home after the group stage if the alternative is facing spain in the round of 8 :D I dont know, England can turtle really well. They have nearly 50 years of peoples prayers getting jammed up the heaven pipeline, somethings got to give, surely ? | ||
Caphe
Vietnam10817 Posts
And now Rooney can play, I wonder who will be taken out for a place of Rooney | ||
bardtown
England2313 Posts
| ||
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On June 16 2012 05:59 Caphe wrote: England deserve to win this game, the 2nd half is crazy. That goal from Welbeck is one of this euro's best up to this point. He always got some much flair in him. And now Rooney can play, I wonder who will be taken out for a place of Rooney Caroll, He can head it and he can smash it once in a while but meh, Welbeck is just a far better option. | ||
Sonic Death Monkey
Sweden991 Posts
| ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
On June 16 2012 05:59 Caphe wrote: England deserve to win this game, the 2nd half is crazy. That goal from Welbeck is one of this euro's best up to this point. He always got some much flair in him. And now Rooney can play, I wonder who will be taken out for a place of Rooney Should be Carroll, will probably be Welbeck | ||
Aeroplaneoverthesea
United Kingdom1977 Posts
On June 16 2012 05:57 Hassybaby wrote: Phil Jones is an option as well. He's amazingly versatile so I don't know why he's not played I'm a United fan so I've seen a lot of Phil Jones. Jones is a talented player and in the future I think he'll be a starter for England either in midfield or at centre back. Right now though he's extremely naive positionally and given he's against Yarmalenko (Ukraine's best player) I think I'd prefer Johnson. For all Johnson's endless lapses in concentration and bad positioning he's a least very, very quick so can make up for it. Jones's isn't that quick and right back is probably his worst position (so much so we play Rafael, Fabio and Smalling ahead of him at full back). Jones's isn't ready for this stage yet imo. | ||
Aeroplaneoverthesea
United Kingdom1977 Posts
On June 16 2012 05:57 JoelB wrote: who ever gets second in this group: you have my pity ... you could as well go home after the group stage if the alternative is facing spain in the round of 8 :D Italy and Croatia both look really good too so it won't be easy for 1st place either. | ||
JoelB
Germany311 Posts
On June 16 2012 05:59 Rebs wrote: I dont know, England can turtle really well. They have nearly 50 years of peoples prayers getting jammed up the heaven pipeline, somethings got to give, surely ? turtle you will, if you want it or not ... the only chance is to destroy their game, frustrate them and play pressing like there is no tomorrow. | ||
Storchen
Sweden4385 Posts
![]() | ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
On June 16 2012 06:02 Aeroplaneoverthesea wrote: I'm a United fan so I've seen a lot of Phil Jones. Jones is a talented player and in the future I think he'll be a starter for England either in midfield or at centre back. Right now though he's extremely naive positionally and given he's against Yarmalenko (Ukraine's best player) I think I'd prefer Johnson. For all Johnson's endless lapses in concentration and bad positioning he's a least very, very quick so can make up for it. Jones's isn't that quick and right back is probably his worst position (so much so we play Rafael, Fabio and Smalling ahead of him at full back). Jones's isn't ready for this stage yet imo. I'm also a United fan (yay :D) I agree. I think Jones works better as a holding midfielder. But I think he'll most definitely be an option if they need it. I dunno, I thought Johnson played really well that game :3 | ||
SnowyPsilocybin
United Kingdom265 Posts
| ||
Aeroplaneoverthesea
United Kingdom1977 Posts
On June 16 2012 06:05 Hassybaby wrote: I'm also a United fan (yay :D) I agree. I think Jones works better as a holding midfielder. But I think he'll most definitely be an option if they need it. I dunno, I thought Johnson played really well that game :3 He played Mellberg onside for their first. He was marking (or rather not marking) Mellberg for their second. He let their left back Ollson come inside him for the Kallstrom chance which he should have scored. He was completely at fault for both their goals. | ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
"nope, we're waaaaaay too bad right now" | ||
Hittegods
Stockholm4640 Posts
On June 16 2012 06:01 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: Hard to tell how good/bad Hamren is. The players to his disposal was quite bad compared to the last decade imo. I wouldn't mind giving him another shot. Pretty easy to tell how bad/naive he is. | ||
| ||