EPTI think it should since they know what they are doing is wrong but are doing it on purpose to set a bold statement that they are an internet bad ass or they cannot construct what they want to say properly.
The Automated Ban List - Page 80
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
Kralic
Canada2628 Posts
I think it should since they know what they are doing is wrong but are doing it on purpose to set a bold statement that they are an internet bad ass or they cannot construct what they want to say properly. | ||
|
Avidkeystamper
United States8551 Posts
| ||
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
On June 15 2010 10:11 Avidkeystamper wrote: Gtks is banned! He sent me a few spammy PMs that I had no clue what they meant... The four PMs: Anyway i belive it has to do with the time now in seoul is midnight 3:25 in Greece 21:26 and were you are somewere 14:00 (time zone i don't know) i'm gonna wait sme days and then we will see. The think is only Snow made 3 fake attacks and figure out the next step witch was 1 fake can turn into real, as i was telling you about hehehe. But Snow figurit out by him self and witjout my help and that's the thing heh cleaver boy. I can't belive Flash can figure out a way to stop it and he may be pissed with me some peopleo wrote it back in the previus posts but there is no problem that i can;t fix i will through up everyting to him prive. Flash isn't creative? i can't belive that. Flash nick is Ypang right? he dosn't reply to me and i can't belive he couldn't figure it by know what is going on if i release this things in public we gonna have problem. And the other two were saying something about not liking an article. | ||
|
Avidkeystamper
United States8551 Posts
I'm done with this threat. | ||
|
Vancebla_
29 Posts
| ||
|
Nal_rAwr
United States2611 Posts
| ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22250 Posts
On June 15 2010 01:06 Happy.fairytail wrote: In follow-up to the above poster, is it okay to call an idiot an idiot if you do it in a funny way? =P Calling someone out while being funny/original about it is actually encouraged. | ||
intrigue
Washington, D.C9933 Posts
| ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36370 Posts
On June 15 2010 13:39 EvilTeletubby wrote: Calling someone out while being funny/original about it is actually encouraged. While this is true, if you attempt to do this and fail, you'll still get banned. "Comediens" beware. | ||
|
schiznak
Australia258 Posts
I got banned for quoting someone trying to say that fastest maps take far more skill than low money maps and saying "inb4 excrement-storm" Someone in a thread a few minutes later writes "inb4 shitstorm" and nothing happens, am I to believe that using watered down swearwords was the cause for my ban? also, 2 week ban for what i said is hardly necessary. 1 day ban was hardly necessary. Giving me a warning would be pushing it. In summation, I like kennigit one notch less than i did before. | ||
|
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
On June 15 2010 15:17 schiznak wrote: I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this, but w/e I got banned for quoting someone trying to say that fastest maps take far more skill than low money maps and saying "inb4 excrement-storm" Someone in a thread a few minutes later writes "inb4 shitstorm" and nothing happens, am I to believe that using watered down swearwords was the cause for my ban? also, 2 week ban for what i said is hardly necessary. 1 day ban was hardly necessary. Giving me a warning would be pushing it. In summation, I like kennigit one notch less than i did before. Nah... 2 weeks might be long but that sort of crap posting is really frowned on. Why would you even feel the need to post that? Nobody laughs and it just pisses people off... It's the same with people writing "first" and all that jazz... If someone got away with it... thats not the mods fault unless they specifically skipped it... and even then with this reporting system it's likely now that it will get caught and reported to a mod. | ||
|
schiznak
Australia258 Posts
On June 15 2010 15:24 meeple wrote: Nah... 2 weeks might be long but that sort of crap posting is really frowned on. Why would you even feel the need to post that? Nobody laughs and it just pisses people off... It's the same with people writing "first" and all that jazz... If someone got away with it... thats not the mods fault unless they specifically skipped it... and even then with this reporting system it's likely now that it will get caught and reported to a mod. So i had had changed it to something along the lines of "I predict that subsequent posts following mine will be primarily angry posts attempting to refute the above assertion" i would have been all good? | ||
zatic
Zurich15312 Posts
On June 15 2010 15:28 schiznak wrote: So i had had changed it to something along the lines of "I predict that subsequent posts following mine will be primarily angry posts attempting to refute the above assertion" i would have been all good? Yes. The other guy in the thread you were banned for was most likely just overlooked. I sure would have banned him as well. | ||
|
seppolevne
Canada1681 Posts
| ||
|
Invictus
Singapore2697 Posts
| ||
|
schiznak
Australia258 Posts
On June 15 2010 16:38 seppolevne wrote: But it's not like that post adds much to the discussion either. Same with "this is the first reply to the thread", "I am posting before this thread is closed as it is not up to standard" and other such nonsense. I see your point | ||
|
NeoLearner
Belgium1847 Posts
On June 15 2010 16:44 streamofhonour wrote: vancebla was the most worthy ban, his posting history is so terrible i can't use words to describe it -.- QFT  Still not sure if he was doing it on purpose or if he was just plain dense... | ||
|
clickrush
Switzerland3257 Posts
On June 15 2010 19:49 NeoLearner wrote: QFT Still not sure if he was doing it on purpose or if he was just plain dense...this posts are pure entertainment. everytime you look up a post you think "ok the next one cant be any dumber". | ||
|
InfiniteIce
United States794 Posts
On June 15 2010 15:17 schiznak wrote: I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this, but w/e I got banned for quoting someone trying to say that fastest maps take far more skill than low money maps and saying "inb4 excrement-storm" Someone in a thread a few minutes later writes "inb4 shitstorm" and nothing happens, am I to believe that using watered down swearwords was the cause for my ban? also, 2 week ban for what i said is hardly necessary. 1 day ban was hardly necessary. Giving me a warning would be pushing it. In summation, I like kennigit one notch less than i did before. You don't need to predict anything. I mean hey, I enjoy shitposting once in a while just as much as the next guy, but there's another, anonymous forum for that. My understanding (I am not a moderator on this forum and do not wish to imply otherwise. This is simply common sense...) is that perhaps had you posted some valid response with either concrete reasoning or at least something more than a one-line shitpost, perhaps detailing your thoughts and response to the post you actually quoted (Do you agree that 'Fastest' maps actually take more skill? No? Yes? WHY? Do you think the majority of users will disagree with you? Then, inb4shitstorm.), you can probably get away with the inb4chan-esque comments. Not that they add anything relevant to your discussions whatsoever, but if you're going to be a smart-ass, then don't be a dumbass about it. (Get it?) + Show Spoiler + In summation, how many notches is he at now? Lol. Personally, Ken has some of the best bans, I think. Sorry for double spoiler, but the spoiler below contains double-nested quotes, don't want to break the page... + Show Spoiler [Long quote re: user 'Competent&#…] + On June 13 2010 09:36 intrigue wrote: lol @ this guy an analogy of what happened here: you get all sassy with your older brother because your parents are like right there and you know he won't hit you in front of them. your mom turns around and punches you in the face. i think these people expect that by saying stuff like this that 1. they're protecting themselves or 2. moderators will feel stupid and 'predicted' if they do ban them, but in reality 1. is not true at all and 2. we just post (verbatim) "LMAO" and "ROFL" in the staff ban discussion thread. In response to that, I'll just leave this here. I just found the TL.Net commandments again, some things I had already forgotten in my admittedly short time here, everybody could use a reminder on the rules I think, myself included. TL.Net Ten CommandmentsDon't be a drama queen martyr. TeamLiquid isn't colonial America or Tianamen Square. You do not need to preemptively declare "I'm going to be banned for this..." or "ban me, I don't care." Our Moderators ban for good reasons. If they read someone acting like a martyr, they'll simply treat it as a request to be banned. PS, I love the automated ban list. (I don't love it so much that I would like to be on it though)...it truly makes me a little giggly. <3 PPS to the lovely Moderators: Are there ban statistics? I'm curious as to who has the biggest, ballsiest b&hammer in the land... Can a Mod ban another Mod (or can some mods ban some other mods?) Just curious.. | ||
Manifesto7
Osaka27118 Posts
On June 15 2010 16:38 seppolevne wrote: But it's not like that post adds much to the discussion either. Same with "this is the first reply to the thread", "I am posting before this thread is closed as it is not up to standard" and other such nonsense. Why are you worrying about the fine line of what is / isn't acceptable? Just post the best you can. That way you would never have a problem and you don't have to worry about it. You can't compare yourself because "so and so" didn't get banned. You are responsible for your own actions. Make the best of yourself. | ||
| ||
