|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
B.I.G. was just temp banned for 30 days by Nyovne.
That account was created on 2010-08-14 21:13:10 and had 637 posts.
Reason: Since you seem determined to keep trolling, maybe a 30 day stay under that cold and windy bridge will make you think again before going for that reply button in the future. I have my doubts but a mod can hope.
Very glad that he's gotten banned, I've seen a few of his posts around and they've all been really douchey.
|
jdseemoreglass was just temp banned for 2 days by micronesia. That account was created on 2010-07-23 07:33:10 and had 1235 posts. Reason: Show nested quote +On June 22 2011 10:39 jdseemoreglass wrote: + Show Spoiler +On June 22 2011 10:16 BlackJack wrote: + Show Spoiler +On June 22 2011 10:10 jdseemoreglass wrote:
One day mankind will solve death. If we just have enough of other people's money and we have scientific progress we can achieve immortality for everyone. Of course it won't happen in America, because we are backwards and get everything wrong and should learn from the other countries how to behave.
There is no reason for a person to die of cancer or any other deadly disease. Every time I hear about someone dying in the news, or taking great pains to try and survive as long as possible, I question where the system failed them. We've got a lot of ignorant capitalists here who believe in things like natural selection and think it's normal for people to die. Well it's not. We just haven't advanced politically far enough to end death, like many countries have ended poverty.
I just hope America isn't beat to solving mortality by a nation like Cuba or North Korea. That would be very embarrassing considering how many economic advantages we have.
Are you trolling or do you really believe what you write down? I hope it's the former What makes you think I'm trolling? Maybe I didn't explain what I meant very clearly. Let me try and rephrase the argument... There are many, many people who have died, right? I mean I hear about it all the time in the news and in history and stuff. And yet, at the same time, there are tons of people alive and living. Clearly that means that death isn't really necessary, or else we would all be dead. So how come some people die and so many other people haven't died? Well clearly it's because there is an unequal distribution of wealth. If all of the people who died had the same exact health care as the people who are alive, then no one would be dead. So to cure mortality, all we have to do is take the health care from the richest people and apply it to the poorest people. This is pretty much common sense. But our voters and politicians are so dumb they don't see this logic. People are really very immoral because they refuse to give up their money, essentially they want other people to die for their own greed. If it wasn't for greed we could have cured death a long time ago. Keep your ridiculous bulls*** out of discussion threads.
You have to admire that his brain is capable of such weird logic. It is so illogical that it almost makes sense. Some kind of idiot-savant thing going on here.
Death can't be necessary because people are alive? That's going to stick with me. Probably not in the way he intended but hey at least his point got across...
Or did it...
Edit:
The funny thing about that thread is ProXi created a profile in February to write this
"I'm the man in this mother fucker."
That takes some patience...
|
What the fuck..
Seldom do I use that phrase with full force.
If it wasn't for greed we could have cured death a long time ago.
What. The. Fuck.
+ Show Spoiler + Seriously. What the fuck. My brain just stroked off trying to save me from thinking too hard about that post.
|
Jdseemoreglass is no stranger to temp. bans. A large shame because I think he is a generally nice guy, just very misguided to say the least.
|
arthurrr157 was just temp banned for 30 days by H.
That account was created on 2010-11-04 02:30:30 and had 42 posts.
Reason: Don't make terrible OPs in the forum. on the other hand was no great surprise.
|
On June 22 2011 13:20 Torte de Lini wrote:
Jdseemoreglass is no stranger to temp. bans. A large shame because I think he is a generally nice guy, just very misguided to say the least.
After reading that quote, this is really understated.
|
On June 22 2011 12:51 Probulous wrote:Show nested quote +jdseemoreglass was just temp banned for 2 days by micronesia. That account was created on 2010-07-23 07:33:10 and had 1235 posts. Reason: On June 22 2011 10:39 jdseemoreglass wrote: + Show Spoiler +On June 22 2011 10:16 BlackJack wrote: + Show Spoiler +On June 22 2011 10:10 jdseemoreglass wrote:
One day mankind will solve death. If we just have enough of other people's money and we have scientific progress we can achieve immortality for everyone. Of course it won't happen in America, because we are backwards and get everything wrong and should learn from the other countries how to behave.
There is no reason for a person to die of cancer or any other deadly disease. Every time I hear about someone dying in the news, or taking great pains to try and survive as long as possible, I question where the system failed them. We've got a lot of ignorant capitalists here who believe in things like natural selection and think it's normal for people to die. Well it's not. We just haven't advanced politically far enough to end death, like many countries have ended poverty.
I just hope America isn't beat to solving mortality by a nation like Cuba or North Korea. That would be very embarrassing considering how many economic advantages we have.
Are you trolling or do you really believe what you write down? I hope it's the former What makes you think I'm trolling? Maybe I didn't explain what I meant very clearly. Let me try and rephrase the argument... There are many, many people who have died, right? I mean I hear about it all the time in the news and in history and stuff. And yet, at the same time, there are tons of people alive and living. Clearly that means that death isn't really necessary, or else we would all be dead. So how come some people die and so many other people haven't died? Well clearly it's because there is an unequal distribution of wealth. If all of the people who died had the same exact health care as the people who are alive, then no one would be dead. So to cure mortality, all we have to do is take the health care from the richest people and apply it to the poorest people. This is pretty much common sense. But our voters and politicians are so dumb they don't see this logic. People are really very immoral because they refuse to give up their money, essentially they want other people to die for their own greed. If it wasn't for greed we could have cured death a long time ago. You have to admire that his brain is capable of such weird logic. It is so illogical that it almost makes sense. Some kind of idiot-savant thing going on here. Death can't be necessary because people are alive? That's going to stick with me. Probably not in the way he intended but hey at least his point got across... Or did it...
In some way it makes sense to me. While death may be natural, it may be the next great thing for mankind to conquer. He didn't exactly state it in a completely understandable manner, and I get the feeling that he walked away from his computer and when he came back to writing the post he lost his train of thought, but when you break it down:
Death is natural, yet it is one of the great things for man to conquer.
He lost his train of sanity thought when he started talking about how conquering death would require research, and politicians are greedy and rich people are greedy.
In some ways, I agree with the last statement. I believe that a family, be it rich or not, can comfortably live in a decent sized house, so one rich guy having his own 5 acre personal mansion is stupid, wasteful, and immoral.
|
On June 22 2011 14:29 Kinetik_Inferno wrote:Show nested quote +On June 22 2011 12:51 Probulous wrote:jdseemoreglass was just temp banned for 2 days by micronesia. That account was created on 2010-07-23 07:33:10 and had 1235 posts. Reason: On June 22 2011 10:39 jdseemoreglass wrote: + Show Spoiler +On June 22 2011 10:16 BlackJack wrote: + Show Spoiler +On June 22 2011 10:10 jdseemoreglass wrote:
One day mankind will solve death. If we just have enough of other people's money and we have scientific progress we can achieve immortality for everyone. Of course it won't happen in America, because we are backwards and get everything wrong and should learn from the other countries how to behave.
There is no reason for a person to die of cancer or any other deadly disease. Every time I hear about someone dying in the news, or taking great pains to try and survive as long as possible, I question where the system failed them. We've got a lot of ignorant capitalists here who believe in things like natural selection and think it's normal for people to die. Well it's not. We just haven't advanced politically far enough to end death, like many countries have ended poverty.
I just hope America isn't beat to solving mortality by a nation like Cuba or North Korea. That would be very embarrassing considering how many economic advantages we have.
Are you trolling or do you really believe what you write down? I hope it's the former What makes you think I'm trolling? Maybe I didn't explain what I meant very clearly. Let me try and rephrase the argument... There are many, many people who have died, right? I mean I hear about it all the time in the news and in history and stuff. And yet, at the same time, there are tons of people alive and living. Clearly that means that death isn't really necessary, or else we would all be dead. So how come some people die and so many other people haven't died? Well clearly it's because there is an unequal distribution of wealth. If all of the people who died had the same exact health care as the people who are alive, then no one would be dead. So to cure mortality, all we have to do is take the health care from the richest people and apply it to the poorest people. This is pretty much common sense. But our voters and politicians are so dumb they don't see this logic. People are really very immoral because they refuse to give up their money, essentially they want other people to die for their own greed. If it wasn't for greed we could have cured death a long time ago. You have to admire that his brain is capable of such weird logic. It is so illogical that it almost makes sense. Some kind of idiot-savant thing going on here. Death can't be necessary because people are alive? That's going to stick with me. Probably not in the way he intended but hey at least his point got across... Or did it... In some way it makes sense to me. While death may be natural, it may be the next great thing for mankind to conquer. He didn't exactly state it in a completely understandable manner, and I get the feeling that he walked away from his computer and when he came back to writing the post he lost his train of thought, but when you break it down: Death is natural, yet it is one of the great things for man to conquer. He lost his train of sanity thought when he started talking about how conquering death would require research, and politicians are greedy and rich people are greedy. In some ways, I agree with the last statement. I believe that a family, be it rich or not, can comfortably live in a decent sized house, so one rich guy having his own 5 acre personal mansion is stupid, wasteful, and immoral.
You are of course, correct. Death is only natural because we haven't found a cure yet. I guess the premise isn't a problem it is the very strange logic he tried to use to support it. People living != People living forever.
|
Human Centipede was just banned by Plexa.
That account was created on 2011-06-21 19:12:07 and had 14 posts.
Reason: Go away backho
BackHo was just banned by Plexa.
That account was created on 2008-12-27 17:24:11 and had 400 posts.
Reason: Ban dodging. Reregister and you will be IP banned.
Something about this man being completely banned is... (inhale) refreshing.
|
He's been trolling TL since I registered. I don't know how his mind works.
|
I'm glad he's banned. I hated everything he said in that Christian blog thing. I won't say more, but I was really praying for his ban, thanks a lot :3!
|
On June 21 2011 09:17 leo23 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 21 2011 09:14 Torte de Lini wrote:ROOTFayth was just temp banned for 30 days by Manifesto7.
That account was created on 2004-01-25 05:35:47 and had 1244 posts.
Reason: "well u played WOW many many hours
maybe it wasn't a brag, maybe u were ashamed and posted a link of that
my bad, I'm sorry
go practice bro you're wasting time"
-_- Fayth meets the list :3 Haha I was just reading that thread and it was really juicy!!
yep, that thread is hilarious.. Manifesto closed it, opened it few hours later with warning, but it's still the same.
My question is: should TL let players like him promote themselves here? Is there some kind of policy what is acceptable and what is not? Because from what I saw in that stream + BM thread all he's doing on ladder is trashtalking about how he won money in Blizzcon, how he gets paid to play the game and how his opponents are nobodies. Seems pretty pathetic to me.
|
On June 22 2011 20:06 ondik wrote:Show nested quote +On June 21 2011 09:17 leo23 wrote:On June 21 2011 09:14 Torte de Lini wrote:ROOTFayth was just temp banned for 30 days by Manifesto7.
That account was created on 2004-01-25 05:35:47 and had 1244 posts.
Reason: "well u played WOW many many hours
maybe it wasn't a brag, maybe u were ashamed and posted a link of that
my bad, I'm sorry
go practice bro you're wasting time"
-_- Fayth meets the list :3 Haha I was just reading that thread and it was really juicy!! yep, that thread is hilarious.. Manifesto closed it, opened it few hours later with warning, but it's still the same. My question is: should TL let players like him promote themselves here? Is there some kind of policy what is acceptable and what is not? Because from what I saw in that stream + BM thread all he's doing on ladder is trashtalking about how he won money in Blizzcon, how he gets paid to play the game and how his opponents are nobodies. Seems pretty pathetic to me.
From what I saw in the thread (briefly glanced over it to see what the fuss was about) a person like that doesn't need others to try and force him to be excluded, he seems to be willing to do that on his own with the way he acts. I'm sure the community will pass judgement - unless he gains IdrA's skill level I doubt he'll be accepted lol
Makes me wonder how old he is, then I realise I don't really care lol.
|
off topic (or is it):
u guys need to stop the ban wagon a second and go "sign up" on to the best fan club ever...
need i say more bi at ches 
|
Hey guys, I have a question:
About those study bans, they are hillarous and have their purpose, but can't you still view TL logged out? I would guess it's a more time consuming just browsing than actual posting.
Good luck to everyone with exams!
|
On June 22 2011 22:17 matko5 wrote:
Hey guys, I have a question:
About those study bans, they are hillarous and have their purpose, but can't you still view TL logged out? I would guess it's a more time consuming just browsing than actual posting.
Good luck to everyone with exams!
Yeah you can, but most people who request these bans post a lot and need to focus on studying/whatever for some time. They can still read, but when they are not able to give their opinion, it makes it less attractive to go on TL.
|
On June 22 2011 15:01 H wrote:
He's been trolling TL since I registered. I don't know how his mind works.
This was the asian super religious christian who went athiest and back again over several names here, correct??
|
On June 22 2011 13:18 Probe1 wrote:What the fuck.. Seldom do I use that phrase with full force.
This makes perfect sense if you don't take it literally and think about it in a broader sense. Probably still trolling, but true.
|
On June 22 2011 22:48 Hawk wrote:Show nested quote +On June 22 2011 15:01 H wrote:
He's been trolling TL since I registered. I don't know how his mind works. This was the asian super religious christian who went athiest and back again over several names here, correct??
Yes, that's him.
|
The way I feel when I read religion threads on TL must be how Caller feels when he reads economics threads.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
