Plot twist:
is the pbu stephen strange, is the mod dormamu?
or have i got it the wrong way around?

| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
fluidrone
France1478 Posts
June 18 2018 13:16 GMT
#59861
Plot twist: is the pbu stephen strange, is the mod dormamu? or have i got it the wrong way around? ![]() | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
June 18 2018 13:52 GMT
#59862
On June 18 2018 20:14 evilfatsh1t wrote: the reason implies he didnt confirm fortnitebattlepass was right! moderation is an ego-driven machine of belittlement and inconsistency with only as much transparency as the mods choose User was warned for this post edit: come on guys, that was clearly a joke. | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
June 18 2018 16:23 GMT
#59863
| ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
June 18 2018 17:07 GMT
#59864
On June 18 2018 22:52 ticklishmusic wrote: edit: come on guys, that was clearly a joke. aint no such thing on the web | ||
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37043 Posts
June 18 2018 17:43 GMT
#59865
On June 19 2018 01:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote: The post above is just...really mod (whoever it was) really? Someone has a thin skin and a lack of a sense of humour. Judging by what the mod wrote when he sent that warning, I'm assuming the mod was also joking as well. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
June 18 2018 17:52 GMT
#59866
On June 19 2018 02:43 Seeker wrote: Show nested quote + On June 19 2018 01:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote: The post above is just...really mod (whoever it was) really? Someone has a thin skin and a lack of a sense of humour. Judging by what the mod wrote when he sent that warning, I'm assuming the mod was also joking as well. BigFan? | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
June 18 2018 17:56 GMT
#59867
On June 19 2018 02:43 Seeker wrote: Show nested quote + On June 19 2018 01:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote: The post above is just...really mod (whoever it was) really? Someone has a thin skin and a lack of a sense of humour. Judging by what the mod wrote when he sent that warning, I'm assuming the mod was also joking as well. actually, i have a question on this - i've always assumed all warnings/ bans were created more or less equal (i guess banbets are an exception), ie there aren't really any "joke" warnings/ bans. is that right, or no? | ||
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37043 Posts
June 18 2018 18:00 GMT
#59868
On June 19 2018 02:56 ticklishmusic wrote: Show nested quote + On June 19 2018 02:43 Seeker wrote: On June 19 2018 01:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote: The post above is just...really mod (whoever it was) really? Someone has a thin skin and a lack of a sense of humour. Judging by what the mod wrote when he sent that warning, I'm assuming the mod was also joking as well. actually, i have a question on this - i've always assumed all warnings/ bans were created more or less equal (i guess banbets are an exception), ie there aren't really any "joke" warnings/ bans. is that right, or no? If a warning we give you was meant to be taken as a joke, then we go into your mod notes, and edit that warning message to reflect that so that when any other mod comes into your mod notes to see your mod history, they know not to count that particular one against you. In this case, the mod used a , so I automatically know not to take that warning seriously. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
June 18 2018 18:05 GMT
#59869
On June 19 2018 03:00 Seeker wrote: Show nested quote + On June 19 2018 02:56 ticklishmusic wrote: On June 19 2018 02:43 Seeker wrote: On June 19 2018 01:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote: The post above is just...really mod (whoever it was) really? Someone has a thin skin and a lack of a sense of humour. Judging by what the mod wrote when he sent that warning, I'm assuming the mod was also joking as well. actually, i have a question on this - i've always assumed all warnings/ bans were created more or less equal (i guess banbets are an exception), ie there aren't really any "joke" warnings/ bans. is that right, or no? If a warning we give you was meant to be taken as a joke, then we go into your mod notes, and edit that warning message to reflect that so that when any other mod comes into your mod notes to see your mod history, they know not to count that particular one against you. In this case, the mod used a , so I automatically know not to take that warning seriously.cool. i appreciate the clarification. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18112 Posts
June 18 2018 18:06 GMT
#59870
On June 19 2018 03:00 Seeker wrote: Show nested quote + On June 19 2018 02:56 ticklishmusic wrote: On June 19 2018 02:43 Seeker wrote: On June 19 2018 01:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote: The post above is just...really mod (whoever it was) really? Someone has a thin skin and a lack of a sense of humour. Judging by what the mod wrote when he sent that warning, I'm assuming the mod was also joking as well. actually, i have a question on this - i've always assumed all warnings/ bans were created more or less equal (i guess banbets are an exception), ie there aren't really any "joke" warnings/ bans. is that right, or no? If a warning we give you was meant to be taken as a joke, then we go into your mod notes, and edit that warning message to reflect that so that when any other mod comes into your mod notes to see your mod history, they know not to count that particular one against you. In this case, the mod used a , so I automatically know not to take that warning seriously.Ok, but us users can't see modnotes, so all we get is a "user was warned for this post", and then we get sad, because we think some mod went full Romanian. | ||
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37043 Posts
June 18 2018 18:11 GMT
#59871
On June 19 2018 03:06 Acrofales wrote: Show nested quote + On June 19 2018 03:00 Seeker wrote: On June 19 2018 02:56 ticklishmusic wrote: On June 19 2018 02:43 Seeker wrote: On June 19 2018 01:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote: The post above is just...really mod (whoever it was) really? Someone has a thin skin and a lack of a sense of humour. Judging by what the mod wrote when he sent that warning, I'm assuming the mod was also joking as well. actually, i have a question on this - i've always assumed all warnings/ bans were created more or less equal (i guess banbets are an exception), ie there aren't really any "joke" warnings/ bans. is that right, or no? If a warning we give you was meant to be taken as a joke, then we go into your mod notes, and edit that warning message to reflect that so that when any other mod comes into your mod notes to see your mod history, they know not to count that particular one against you. In this case, the mod used a , so I automatically know not to take that warning seriously.Ok, but us users can't see modnotes, so all we get is a "user was warned for this post", and then we get sad, because we think some mod went full Romanian. Well, whenever we send a warning, we always attach a statement explaining why you got that warning. So, there are 2 scenarios here: 1) You get a warning message and the statement seems serious. But later, the mod goes into your mod note and edits that message to reflect that it was a joke. Mods can see that it was a joke but the user will never know it was a joke until the mod personally clarifies it. 2) You get a warning message and the statement is clearly meant to be taken as a joke. There is no need for the mod to go into your mod note and do any additional edits because the initial statement is already not to be taken seriously. In ticklish's case, it was scenario 2. | ||
|
Sent.
Poland9245 Posts
June 18 2018 18:16 GMT
#59872
| ||
|
KwarK
United States43210 Posts
June 18 2018 18:45 GMT
#59873
On June 19 2018 03:16 Sent. wrote: What if someone has lots of type 2 mod notes? Do you take that into account when temp banning the guy for something else? Joke warnings aren’t warnings. They have no impact. | ||
|
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
June 18 2018 22:30 GMT
#59874
On June 19 2018 01:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote: The post above is just...really mod (whoever it was) really? Someone has a thin skin and a lack of a sense of humour. or maybe, just maybe you are lacking a sense of humour? Did you even read the warning? It should've been pretty obvious that it was a joke warning. Well, at least I got ABL going again Much like both Seeker and Kwark mentioned, joke warnings are pretty obvious and don't count towards any future actions. | ||
|
brian
United States9629 Posts
June 18 2018 22:31 GMT
#59875
On June 19 2018 07:30 BigFan wrote: Show nested quote + On June 19 2018 01:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote: The post above is just...really mod (whoever it was) really? Someone has a thin skin and a lack of a sense of humour. or maybe, just maybe you are lacking a sense of humour? Did you even read the warning? It should've been pretty obvious that it was a joke warning. Well, at least I got ABL going again Much like both Seeker and Kwark mentioned, joke warnings are pretty obvious and don't count towards any future actions.us normies can’t read other people’s warnings. much as i’d like to. | ||
|
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
June 18 2018 22:35 GMT
#59876
On June 19 2018 07:31 brian wrote: Show nested quote + On June 19 2018 07:30 BigFan wrote: On June 19 2018 01:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote: The post above is just...really mod (whoever it was) really? Someone has a thin skin and a lack of a sense of humour. or maybe, just maybe you are lacking a sense of humour? Did you even read the warning? It should've been pretty obvious that it was a joke warning. Well, at least I got ABL going again Much like both Seeker and Kwark mentioned, joke warnings are pretty obvious and don't count towards any future actions.us normies can’t read other people’s warnings. much as i’d like to. ah dang, thought there was a warning list for some reason, my bad. Guess that was a banling thing only then. Only other thing is that ticklishmusic could probably have shared the warning or reacted more to it if he thought it was serious. As for the warning, without revealing much, it was mostly a tongue in cheek joke which was easily identifiable. edit: this also means that going forth, I shall issue more bans than warnings! ![]() | ||
|
micronesia
United States24740 Posts
June 18 2018 22:42 GMT
#59877
+ Show Spoiler + Mod Notes for micronesia: ![]() | ||
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37043 Posts
June 19 2018 01:15 GMT
#59878
On June 19 2018 07:35 BigFan wrote: Show nested quote + On June 19 2018 07:31 brian wrote: On June 19 2018 07:30 BigFan wrote: On June 19 2018 01:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote: The post above is just...really mod (whoever it was) really? Someone has a thin skin and a lack of a sense of humour. or maybe, just maybe you are lacking a sense of humour? Did you even read the warning? It should've been pretty obvious that it was a joke warning. Well, at least I got ABL going again Much like both Seeker and Kwark mentioned, joke warnings are pretty obvious and don't count towards any future actions.us normies can’t read other people’s warnings. much as i’d like to. ah dang, thought there was a warning list for some reason, my bad. Guess that was a banling thing only then. Only other thing is that ticklishmusic could probably have shared the warning or reacted more to it if he thought it was serious. As for the warning, without revealing much, it was mostly a tongue in cheek joke which was easily identifiable. edit: this also means that going forth, I shall issue more bans than warnings! ![]() Why are you including a link that non-staff members can't even see? | ||
|
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
June 19 2018 01:33 GMT
#59879
On June 19 2018 10:15 Seeker wrote: Show nested quote + On June 19 2018 07:35 BigFan wrote: On June 19 2018 07:31 brian wrote: On June 19 2018 07:30 BigFan wrote: On June 19 2018 01:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote: The post above is just...really mod (whoever it was) really? Someone has a thin skin and a lack of a sense of humour. or maybe, just maybe you are lacking a sense of humour? Did you even read the warning? It should've been pretty obvious that it was a joke warning. Well, at least I got ABL going again Much like both Seeker and Kwark mentioned, joke warnings are pretty obvious and don't count towards any future actions.us normies can’t read other people’s warnings. much as i’d like to. ah dang, thought there was a warning list for some reason, my bad. Guess that was a banling thing only then. Only other thing is that ticklishmusic could probably have shared the warning or reacted more to it if he thought it was serious. As for the warning, without revealing much, it was mostly a tongue in cheek joke which was easily identifiable. edit: this also means that going forth, I shall issue more bans than warnings! ![]() Why are you including a link that non-staff members can't even see? What does thou speak of? ![]() | ||
|
FO-nTTaX
Johto4954 Posts
June 19 2018 09:31 GMT
#59880
| ||
| ||
StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH240 StarCraft: Brood War• LUISG • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel • sooper7s League of Legends Other Games |
|
WardiTV Korean Royale
OSC
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Kung Fu Cup
Classic vs Solar
herO vs Cure
Reynor vs GuMiho
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
RSL Revival
Solar vs Zoun
MaxPax vs Bunny
Kung Fu Cup
WardiTV Korean Royale
[ Show More ] PiGosaur Monday
RSL Revival
Classic vs Creator
Cure vs TriGGeR
Kung Fu Cup
CranKy Ducklings
RSL Revival
herO vs Gerald
ByuN vs SHIN
Kung Fu Cup
BSL 21
Tarson vs Julia
Doodle vs OldBoy
eOnzErG vs WolFix
StRyKeR vs Aeternum
Sparkling Tuna Cup
RSL Revival
Reynor vs sOs
Maru vs Ryung
Kung Fu Cup
WardiTV Korean Royale
BSL 21
JDConan vs Semih
Dragon vs Dienmax
Tech vs NewOcean
TerrOr vs Artosis
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
|
|
|