|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
your Country52797 Posts
I'm sort of joking. I've definitely heard of those shows but I've never watched them 
|
As great as those are, I still havent seen a comedy I enjoyed more than Yes, Minister/Yes, Prime Minister
|
On June 30 2016 10:04 Jealous wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2016 08:45 IAmWithStupid wrote:On June 30 2016 00:21 LDaVinci wrote:
Is there any way you guys can perma ban the Russian guy on the top whose post seems to be very offensive toward women ?
Unless "quality wife material" is not offensive in english/american then I have a problem of language barrier.
Unless talking about a StarCraft player only as wife potential has suddenly become perfectly fine.
The post has been reported already probably by dozens of people. I, as a guy, find it offensive. I can imagine for the players. Lol, triggered! What if I told you, I don't even play StarCraft, but I love watching it. It is my passion. On the other note, I really love cooking, it is my second passion and I see no problem being in the kitchen (yet another offensive joke, if you know what I mean). If my wife was a SC player and I could make some delicious meal for her while she is playing and then, just for example, watch Code S together, I would call it a big success in life. I would be happy. What is offensive in that?! Chill, mate! *adjusts glasses* Okay listen here you cis male scum, saying things like "wife material" means that you are qualifying the woman in regards to her value as a mate for a man, implying that she has no value if she were not "wife material" and that only a thirsty male such as yourself can determine whether or not she is worthy of your attention which by the way no one asked for, also what if the "wife" you are looking at is a lesbian or trans or asexual or sexually fluid? *scoff* How dare you push your black-and-white zero-sum worldview of sexuality on unsuspecting innocent women simply because of the gender they were born with, heellloooo this is 2016. Go read a book you ignorant misogynist! DOWN WITH MEN! ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/wnIaRyJ.gif) User was temp banned for this post.
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES49505 Posts
his presence in other threads will be missed.
|
Man he's playing in our mafia game right now...
|
Pretty ridiculous to complain about that in the first place though. Maybe i should complain about people objectifying Zest.
|
I thought backseat moderating was supposedly an offense too...
|
On June 30 2016 12:44 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2016 10:04 Jealous wrote:On June 30 2016 08:45 IAmWithStupid wrote:On June 30 2016 00:21 LDaVinci wrote:
Is there any way you guys can perma ban the Russian guy on the top whose post seems to be very offensive toward women ?
Unless "quality wife material" is not offensive in english/american then I have a problem of language barrier.
Unless talking about a StarCraft player only as wife potential has suddenly become perfectly fine.
The post has been reported already probably by dozens of people. I, as a guy, find it offensive. I can imagine for the players. Lol, triggered! What if I told you, I don't even play StarCraft, but I love watching it. It is my passion. On the other note, I really love cooking, it is my second passion and I see no problem being in the kitchen (yet another offensive joke, if you know what I mean). If my wife was a SC player and I could make some delicious meal for her while she is playing and then, just for example, watch Code S together, I would call it a big success in life. I would be happy. What is offensive in that?! Chill, mate! *adjusts glasses* Okay listen here you cis male scum, saying things like "wife material" means that you are qualifying the woman in regards to her value as a mate for a man, implying that she has no value if she were not "wife material" and that only a thirsty male such as yourself can determine whether or not she is worthy of your attention which by the way no one asked for, also what if the "wife" you are looking at is a lesbian or trans or asexual or sexually fluid? *scoff* How dare you push your black-and-white zero-sum worldview of sexuality on unsuspecting innocent women simply because of the gender they were born with, heellloooo this is 2016. Go read a book you ignorant misogynist! DOWN WITH MEN! User was temp banned for this post.
He is already unbanned... man. I sure did not feel those 30 days at all. Time moves so fast here on TL.
|
On June 30 2016 17:08 Wrath wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2016 12:44 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On June 30 2016 10:04 Jealous wrote:On June 30 2016 08:45 IAmWithStupid wrote:On June 30 2016 00:21 LDaVinci wrote:
Is there any way you guys can perma ban the Russian guy on the top whose post seems to be very offensive toward women ?
Unless "quality wife material" is not offensive in english/american then I have a problem of language barrier.
Unless talking about a StarCraft player only as wife potential has suddenly become perfectly fine.
The post has been reported already probably by dozens of people. I, as a guy, find it offensive. I can imagine for the players. Lol, triggered! What if I told you, I don't even play StarCraft, but I love watching it. It is my passion. On the other note, I really love cooking, it is my second passion and I see no problem being in the kitchen (yet another offensive joke, if you know what I mean). If my wife was a SC player and I could make some delicious meal for her while she is playing and then, just for example, watch Code S together, I would call it a big success in life. I would be happy. What is offensive in that?! Chill, mate! *adjusts glasses* Okay listen here you cis male scum, saying things like "wife material" means that you are qualifying the woman in regards to her value as a mate for a man, implying that she has no value if she were not "wife material" and that only a thirsty male such as yourself can determine whether or not she is worthy of your attention which by the way no one asked for, also what if the "wife" you are looking at is a lesbian or trans or asexual or sexually fluid? *scoff* How dare you push your black-and-white zero-sum worldview of sexuality on unsuspecting innocent women simply because of the gender they were born with, heellloooo this is 2016. Go read a book you ignorant misogynist! DOWN WITH MEN! User was temp banned for this post. He is already unbanned... man. I sure did not feel those 30 days at all. Time moves so fast here on TL.
I requested a postponement to the ban so I could finish my current engagements on TeamLiquid. After completing the Mafia game and the 2 tournaments I'm in, i will notify MoonBear to fill my sentence.
|
On June 30 2016 17:34 Jealous wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2016 17:08 Wrath wrote:On June 30 2016 12:44 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On June 30 2016 10:04 Jealous wrote:On June 30 2016 08:45 IAmWithStupid wrote:On June 30 2016 00:21 LDaVinci wrote:
Is there any way you guys can perma ban the Russian guy on the top whose post seems to be very offensive toward women ?
Unless "quality wife material" is not offensive in english/american then I have a problem of language barrier.
Unless talking about a StarCraft player only as wife potential has suddenly become perfectly fine.
The post has been reported already probably by dozens of people. I, as a guy, find it offensive. I can imagine for the players. Lol, triggered! What if I told you, I don't even play StarCraft, but I love watching it. It is my passion. On the other note, I really love cooking, it is my second passion and I see no problem being in the kitchen (yet another offensive joke, if you know what I mean). If my wife was a SC player and I could make some delicious meal for her while she is playing and then, just for example, watch Code S together, I would call it a big success in life. I would be happy. What is offensive in that?! Chill, mate! *adjusts glasses* Okay listen here you cis male scum, saying things like "wife material" means that you are qualifying the woman in regards to her value as a mate for a man, implying that she has no value if she were not "wife material" and that only a thirsty male such as yourself can determine whether or not she is worthy of your attention which by the way no one asked for, also what if the "wife" you are looking at is a lesbian or trans or asexual or sexually fluid? *scoff* How dare you push your black-and-white zero-sum worldview of sexuality on unsuspecting innocent women simply because of the gender they were born with, heellloooo this is 2016. Go read a book you ignorant misogynist! DOWN WITH MEN! User was temp banned for this post. He is already unbanned... man. I sure did not feel those 30 days at all. Time moves so fast here on TL. I requested a postponement to the ban so I could finish my current engagements on TeamLiquid. After completing the Mafia game and the 2 tournaments I'm in, i will notify MoonBear to fill my sentence.
That seems reasonable.
|
On June 30 2016 17:34 Jealous wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2016 17:08 Wrath wrote:On June 30 2016 12:44 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On June 30 2016 10:04 Jealous wrote:On June 30 2016 08:45 IAmWithStupid wrote:On June 30 2016 00:21 LDaVinci wrote:
Is there any way you guys can perma ban the Russian guy on the top whose post seems to be very offensive toward women ?
Unless "quality wife material" is not offensive in english/american then I have a problem of language barrier.
Unless talking about a StarCraft player only as wife potential has suddenly become perfectly fine.
The post has been reported already probably by dozens of people. I, as a guy, find it offensive. I can imagine for the players. Lol, triggered! What if I told you, I don't even play StarCraft, but I love watching it. It is my passion. On the other note, I really love cooking, it is my second passion and I see no problem being in the kitchen (yet another offensive joke, if you know what I mean). If my wife was a SC player and I could make some delicious meal for her while she is playing and then, just for example, watch Code S together, I would call it a big success in life. I would be happy. What is offensive in that?! Chill, mate! *adjusts glasses* Okay listen here you cis male scum, saying things like "wife material" means that you are qualifying the woman in regards to her value as a mate for a man, implying that she has no value if she were not "wife material" and that only a thirsty male such as yourself can determine whether or not she is worthy of your attention which by the way no one asked for, also what if the "wife" you are looking at is a lesbian or trans or asexual or sexually fluid? *scoff* How dare you push your black-and-white zero-sum worldview of sexuality on unsuspecting innocent women simply because of the gender they were born with, heellloooo this is 2016. Go read a book you ignorant misogynist! DOWN WITH MEN! User was temp banned for this post. He is already unbanned... man. I sure did not feel those 30 days at all. Time moves so fast here on TL. I requested a postponement to the ban so I could finish my current engagements on TeamLiquid. After completing the Mafia game and the 2 tournaments I'm in, i will notify MoonBear to fill my sentence.
Ah, that makes sense. I apologize then.
|
On June 30 2016 15:19 OtherWorld wrote:
I thought backseat moderating was supposedly an offense too...
Are you implying that they should ban for backseat moderating? Isn't that backseat moration?
Wait, am I...? Have we had this discussion before?
Actually, it's similar to the chain of "your post isn't helping" you often see. 
You know what I'm talking about:
- A post some negative one-liner in a thread.
- B calls out the one-liner saying that it's not improving the thread.
- A points out that B's post wasn't helpful either.
- C suggest that A should get out of the thread.
- D posts a one-liner in the same vein as A, obviously without having read any of A, B or C's posts.
- C freaks out with a long angry post at D not reading the thread and being wrong, risking a ban.
- B posts a one-liner face palm at the state of the thread and the forum in general.
- E writes a long detailed post in reply to C's rant, going almost entirely off-topic.
- F replies to E, and they get stuck in an independent exchange of walls of text that no one reads, except E and F, if even them.
- someone posts a short question related to the original topic, but no further replies.
- Thread dies out, original topic forgotten as the exchange between E and F draws out until even they get tired of it.
- E and F hook up in an erotic chat room.
In essence you commit the crime you are calling out by calling it out.
|
On June 30 2016 05:55 Cricketer12 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2016 03:56 ThomasjServo wrote:On June 30 2016 03:42 Cricketer12 wrote:On June 29 2016 22:35 The_Templar wrote:On June 29 2016 22:19 farvacola wrote:
Seinfeld>Friends What are those things? Templar...there is no excuse. I chalked it up to him being younger. There is a wealth of excellent references he is missing out on though. I'm like two weeks older than him, temp, there is no excuse.
One does not need excuses, but good tastes :p
|
On June 30 2016 17:48 Cascade wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2016 15:19 OtherWorld wrote:
I thought backseat moderating was supposedly an offense too... Are you implying that they should ban for backseat moderating? Isn't that backseat moration? Wait, am I...? Have we had this discussion before? Actually, it's similar to the chain of "your post isn't helping" you often see. You know what I'm talking about: - A post some negative one-liner in a thread. - B calls out the one-liner saying that it's not improving the thread. - A points out that B's post wasn't helpful either. - C suggest that A should get out of the thread. - D posts a one-liner in the same vein as A, obviously without having read any of A, B or C's posts. - C freaks out with a long angry post at D not reading the thread and being wrong, risking a ban. - B posts a one-liner face palm at the state of the thread and the forum in general. - E writes a long detailed post in reply to C's rant, going almost entirely off-topic. - F replies to E, and they get stuck in an independent exchange of walls of text that no one reads, except E and F, if even them. - someone posts a short question related to the original topic, but no further replies. - Thread dies out, original topic forgotten as the exchange between E and F draws out until even they get tired of it. - E and F hook up in an erotic chat room. In essence you commit the crime you are calling out by calling it out.
Note that, unlike in the original post, I didn't explicitely say that poster X should be banned ; I just pointed out the fact that he commited an offense to TL's rules. Thus I'm not backseat moderating : there's a difference between saying "he stole an apple" and "he should be whipped ten times for stealing that apple".
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES49505 Posts
|
- E and F hook up in an erotic chat room. ?!
|
Canada8157 Posts
|
On June 30 2016 18:03 BLinD-RawR wrote:
stoling is not a word.
indeed, English is hard for French people
|
On June 30 2016 17:59 OtherWorld wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2016 17:48 Cascade wrote:On June 30 2016 15:19 OtherWorld wrote:
I thought backseat moderating was supposedly an offense too... Are you implying that they should ban for backseat moderating? Isn't that backseat moration? Wait, am I...? Have we had this discussion before? Actually, it's similar to the chain of "your post isn't helping" you often see. You know what I'm talking about: - A post some negative one-liner in a thread. - B calls out the one-liner saying that it's not improving the thread. - A points out that B's post wasn't helpful either. - C suggest that A should get out of the thread. - D posts a one-liner in the same vein as A, obviously without having read any of A, B or C's posts. - C freaks out with a long angry post at D not reading the thread and being wrong, risking a ban. - B posts a one-liner face palm at the state of the thread and the forum in general. - E writes a long detailed post in reply to C's rant, going almost entirely off-topic. - F replies to E, and they get stuck in an independent exchange of walls of text that no one reads, except E and F, if even them. - someone posts a short question related to the original topic, but no further replies. - Thread dies out, original topic forgotten as the exchange between E and F draws out until even they get tired of it. - E and F hook up in an erotic chat room. In essence you commit the crime you are calling out by calling it out. Note that, unlike in the original post, I didn't explicitely say that poster X should be banned ; I just pointed out the fact that he commited an offense to TL's rules. Thus I'm not backseat moderating : there's a difference between saying "he stole an apple" and "he should be whipped ten times for stealing that apple".
What you DID say was "I thought stealing an apple was supposedly an offense too...", which I'd say is a passive-aggressive way to call for punishment. But yes, not a literal request for it. At that point I didn't either though, as it was just an emote, and it has a question mark on the sign anyway. Main point is that E and F get to hook up tho. And you don't want to be C.
|
On June 30 2016 18:03 BLinD-RawR wrote:
stoling is not a word.
It's a short to say 'used to had have been about to become stolen eventually', isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
