On June 30 2016 18:16 Jer99 wrote:
Is there pizza involved?
Is there pizza involved?
FO shizzle bro
+ Show Spoiler +
see what I did there?
Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
![]()
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50119 Posts
June 30 2016 09:32 GMT
#55281
On June 30 2016 18:16 Jer99 wrote: Is there pizza involved? FO shizzle bro + Show Spoiler + see what I did there? | ||
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
June 30 2016 09:53 GMT
#55282
| ||
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
June 30 2016 09:53 GMT
#55283
On June 30 2016 18:29 Cascade wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2016 17:59 OtherWorld wrote: On June 30 2016 17:48 Cascade wrote: On June 30 2016 15:19 OtherWorld wrote: I thought backseat moderating was supposedly an offense too... Are you implying that they should ban for backseat moderating? Isn't that backseat moration? ![]() Wait, am I...? Have we had this discussion before? Actually, it's similar to the chain of "your post isn't helping" you often see. ![]() You know what I'm talking about: - A post some negative one-liner in a thread. - B calls out the one-liner saying that it's not improving the thread. - A points out that B's post wasn't helpful either. - C suggest that A should get out of the thread. - D posts a one-liner in the same vein as A, obviously without having read any of A, B or C's posts. - C freaks out with a long angry post at D not reading the thread and being wrong, risking a ban. - B posts a one-liner face palm at the state of the thread and the forum in general. - E writes a long detailed post in reply to C's rant, going almost entirely off-topic. - F replies to E, and they get stuck in an independent exchange of walls of text that no one reads, except E and F, if even them. - someone posts a short question related to the original topic, but no further replies. - Thread dies out, original topic forgotten as the exchange between E and F draws out until even they get tired of it. - E and F hook up in an erotic chat room. In essence you commit the crime you are calling out by calling it out. Note that, unlike in the original post, I didn't explicitely say that poster X should be banned ; I just pointed out the fact that he commited an offense to TL's rules. Thus I'm not backseat moderating : there's a difference between saying "he stole an apple" and "he should be whipped ten times for stealing that apple". What you DID say was "I thought stealing an apple was supposedly an offense too...", which I'd say is a passive-aggressive way to call for punishment. But yes, not a literal request for it. At that point I didn't either though, as it was just an emote, and it has a question mark on the sign anyway. ![]() So which one of you is E and which one is F? | ||
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
June 30 2016 09:53 GMT
#55284
On June 30 2016 18:53 opisska wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2016 18:29 Cascade wrote: On June 30 2016 17:59 OtherWorld wrote: On June 30 2016 17:48 Cascade wrote: On June 30 2016 15:19 OtherWorld wrote: I thought backseat moderating was supposedly an offense too... Are you implying that they should ban for backseat moderating? Isn't that backseat moration? ![]() Wait, am I...? Have we had this discussion before? Actually, it's similar to the chain of "your post isn't helping" you often see. ![]() You know what I'm talking about: - A post some negative one-liner in a thread. - B calls out the one-liner saying that it's not improving the thread. - A points out that B's post wasn't helpful either. - C suggest that A should get out of the thread. - D posts a one-liner in the same vein as A, obviously without having read any of A, B or C's posts. - C freaks out with a long angry post at D not reading the thread and being wrong, risking a ban. - B posts a one-liner face palm at the state of the thread and the forum in general. - E writes a long detailed post in reply to C's rant, going almost entirely off-topic. - F replies to E, and they get stuck in an independent exchange of walls of text that no one reads, except E and F, if even them. - someone posts a short question related to the original topic, but no further replies. - Thread dies out, original topic forgotten as the exchange between E and F draws out until even they get tired of it. - E and F hook up in an erotic chat room. In essence you commit the crime you are calling out by calling it out. Note that, unlike in the original post, I didn't explicitely say that poster X should be banned ; I just pointed out the fact that he commited an offense to TL's rules. Thus I'm not backseat moderating : there's a difference between saying "he stole an apple" and "he should be whipped ten times for stealing that apple". What you DID say was "I thought stealing an apple was supposedly an offense too...", which I'd say is a passive-aggressive way to call for punishment. But yes, not a literal request for it. At that point I didn't either though, as it was just an emote, and it has a question mark on the sign anyway. ![]() So which one of you is E and which one is F? I'll be whichever you want me to be. ![]() | ||
NinjaToss
Austria1383 Posts
June 30 2016 10:01 GMT
#55285
| ||
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
June 30 2016 10:19 GMT
#55286
| ||
![]()
FO-nTTaX
Johto4933 Posts
June 30 2016 11:14 GMT
#55287
Well, if it was erotic, there must have been pizza involved xD | ||
![]()
Jer99
Canada8157 Posts
June 30 2016 11:53 GMT
#55288
On June 30 2016 20:14 FO-nTTaX wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2016 18:32 BLinD-RawR wrote: On June 30 2016 18:16 Jer99 wrote: Is there pizza involved? FO shizzle bro + Show Spoiler + see what I did there? Well, if it was erotic, there must have been pizza involved xD Mandatory pineapples on top | ||
brian
United States9617 Posts
June 30 2016 14:17 GMT
#55289
On June 30 2016 19:19 opisska wrote: "Will you be the F to me E" is a romantic proposal with a very specific target demographic iron enthusiasts. | ||
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
June 30 2016 15:09 GMT
#55290
On June 30 2016 23:17 brian wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2016 19:19 opisska wrote: "Will you be the F to me E" is a romantic proposal with a very specific target demographic iron enthusiasts. That is an unferrous generalization. | ||
FFW_Rude
France10201 Posts
June 30 2016 15:20 GMT
#55291
On June 30 2016 23:17 brian wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2016 19:19 opisska wrote: "Will you be the F to me E" is a romantic proposal with a very specific target demographic iron enthusiasts. I steel don't get it | ||
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
June 30 2016 15:26 GMT
#55292
On July 01 2016 00:20 FFW_Rude wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2016 23:17 brian wrote: On June 30 2016 19:19 opisska wrote: "Will you be the F to me E" is a romantic proposal with a very specific target demographic iron enthusiasts. I steel don't get it Iron-O what the old rusty posters are talking about either. | ||
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
June 30 2016 16:52 GMT
#55293
pho sho | ||
Heartland
Sweden24580 Posts
June 30 2016 17:31 GMT
#55294
On July 01 2016 00:26 Cascade wrote: Show nested quote + On July 01 2016 00:20 FFW_Rude wrote: On June 30 2016 23:17 brian wrote: On June 30 2016 19:19 opisska wrote: "Will you be the F to me E" is a romantic proposal with a very specific target demographic iron enthusiasts. I steel don't get it Iron-O what the old rusty posters are talking about either. There's too much irony in it | ||
Cricketer12
United States13974 Posts
June 30 2016 17:53 GMT
#55295
On June 30 2016 23:17 brian wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2016 19:19 opisska wrote: "Will you be the F to me E" is a romantic proposal with a very specific target demographic iron enthusiasts. I was thinking Fire Emblem but that works too... | ||
![]()
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
June 30 2016 20:29 GMT
#55296
On July 01 2016 02:31 Heartland wrote: Show nested quote + On July 01 2016 00:26 Cascade wrote: On July 01 2016 00:20 FFW_Rude wrote: On June 30 2016 23:17 brian wrote: On June 30 2016 19:19 opisska wrote: "Will you be the F to me E" is a romantic proposal with a very specific target demographic iron enthusiasts. I steel don't get it Iron-O what the old rusty posters are talking about either. There's too much irony in it What, do you want a metal? | ||
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
June 30 2016 23:06 GMT
#55297
On June 30 2016 17:48 Cascade wrote: Show nested quote + On June 30 2016 15:19 OtherWorld wrote: I thought backseat moderating was supposedly an offense too... Are you implying that they should ban for backseat moderating? Isn't that backseat moration? ![]() Wait, am I...? Have we had this discussion before? Actually, it's similar to the chain of "your post isn't helping" you often see. ![]() You know what I'm talking about: - A post some negative one-liner in a thread. - B calls out the one-liner saying that it's not improving the thread. - A points out that B's post wasn't helpful either. - C suggest that A should get out of the thread. - D posts a one-liner in the same vein as A, obviously without having read any of A, B or C's posts. - C freaks out with a long angry post at D not reading the thread and being wrong, risking a ban. - B posts a one-liner face palm at the state of the thread and the forum in general. - E writes a long detailed post in reply to C's rant, going almost entirely off-topic. - F replies to E, and they get stuck in an independent exchange of walls of text that no one reads, except E and F, if even them. - someone posts a short question related to the original topic, but no further replies. - Thread dies out, original topic forgotten as the exchange between E and F draws out until even they get tired of it. - E and F hook up in an erotic chat room. In essence you commit the crime you are calling out by calling it out. - G makes a silly pun. - H through to W joins the steadily deteriorating puns. Thread is beyond any salvation at this point. | ||
![]()
Seeker
![]()
Where dat snitch at?37023 Posts
July 01 2016 00:44 GMT
#55298
| ||
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
July 01 2016 01:14 GMT
#55299
On July 01 2016 09:44 Seeker wrote: WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO THIS THREAD?!?!!? Seems that the ABL posters ironed out a series of clever metallic puns. | ||
Cricketer12
United States13974 Posts
July 01 2016 01:54 GMT
#55300
On July 01 2016 09:44 Seeker wrote: WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO THIS THREAD?!?!!? This seems pretty standard | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • RyuSc2 StarCraft: Brood War![]() • rockletztv ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s League of Legends Other Games |
Esports World Cup
ByuN vs Zoun
SHIN vs TriGGeR
Cyan vs ShoWTimE
Rogue vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs Solar
Reynor vs Maru
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
Esports World Cup
Esports World Cup
CranKy Ducklings
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
CSO Cup
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ] Sparkling Tuna Cup
Online Event
|
|