| Forum Index > Tech Support |
|
Qntc.YuMe
United States792 Posts
or http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824160054 Both are same contrast ratio and size. But most importantly, what monitor is better in a sense for gaming? I havent quite figured it out so someone please help. I understand there are 120 hz monitors but those are not completely necessary for sc2 and it costs quite alot. | ||
|
surraymb
Austria114 Posts
I use a 120 euro cheap benq 22" monitor and it's great. The only reason for getting a better monitor would be stuff like 3D gaming or requiring better viewing angles and color for photo editing and stuff. | ||
Chill
Calgary26004 Posts
| ||
|
Qntc.YuMe
United States792 Posts
On February 19 2011 06:36 Chill wrote: I think this is more appropriate in a hardware forum than TL, but I'll move it to tech support. Ah sorry. | ||
|
Termit
Sweden3466 Posts
So just pick the one you like the most. | ||
|
Qntc.YuMe
United States792 Posts
On February 20 2011 02:53 Termit wrote: The great thing with RTS is that you can play on almost any screen. Every 22-24'' screen out there with 60+ hz and decent MS is fine. The optimal is a 16: 9 aspect ratio screen as you get more view with that but it's all about personal preference. Some like 4:3 CRT better than widescreen lcd etc. So just pick the one you like the most. everyone tells me 16:10 is better for gaming. Why is that so? What makes 16  better in gaming? | ||
|
Herpadurr
Monaco151 Posts
On February 20 2011 04:24 DreamRaider wrote: everyone tells me 16:10 is better for gaming. Why is that so? What makes 16 better in gaming?That is highly dependent on the actual resolution the screen provides. Generally though: the more pixels, the better. With 16 by 10 at 1920*1200 pixels you get 120 more vertical pixels than with 16 by 9 at 1920*1080 (a.k.a. 1080p) pixels and in a game like Starcraft simply see more of the map. 1680*1050 however, which is also a 16 by 10 resolution, provides way less screen space with even the vertical resolution being inferior to 1080p so in this case, the 16 by 9 would be the better choice. This graphic shows what I'm talking about quite nicely, although it is a bit cluttered. | ||
|
Shockk
Germany2269 Posts
On February 20 2011 04:55 Herpadurr wrote: That is highly dependent on the actual resolution the screen provides. Generally though: the more pixels, the better. With 16 by 10 at 1920*1200 pixels you get 120 more vertical pixels than with 16 by 9 at 1920*1080 (a.k.a. 1080p) pixels and in a game like Starcraft simply see more of the map. 1680*1050 however, which is also a 16 by 10 resolution, provides way less screen space with even the vertical resolution being inferior to 1080p so in this case, the 16 by 9 would be the better choice. [...] Actually, you don't. 16 : 9 > 16 : 10 in SC2. At best, you're trading "side" pixels for "bottom" pixels. ![[image loading]](http://h-6.abload.de/img/sc2_fov36k6.gif) | ||
|
Pejorative
Norway1 Post
Get a monitor with 2 MS for better response-time. Also, be sure to read reviews which cover things like ghosting, gamma correction, color correction, etc. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
IntoTheTV X SOOP
ByuN vs Lambo
MaxPax vs Bunny
PiGosaur Cup
The PondCast
Kung Fu Cup
IntoTheTV X SOOP
SHIN vs GuMiho
Clem vs Classic
OSC
WardiTV Invitational
GSL
Epic.LAN
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
