EPT
Classic2.
Dark3.
sOs4.
INnoVation5.
soO6.
Stats7.
Maru8.
TY9.
GuMiho10.
RogueCommunity Power Rank v8: IEM Katowice - Page 3
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Witege
Germany5 Posts
Classic2. Dark3. sOs4. INnoVation5. soO6. Stats7. Maru8. TY9. GuMiho10. Rogue | ||
|
Drfilip
Sweden592 Posts
| ||
|
Penev
28536 Posts
Classic2. Dark3. soO4. INnoVation5. sOs6. Stats7. Maru8. TY9. GuMiho10. TrapOn February 27 2018 05:34 Drfilip wrote: So, I think a lot of people need to change their ranks now. Not all favourites made it through today. Not that everyone even had that opportunity in the first place, but now we know some of those who won't be playing group stages. Should they? I still think Stats is top 10 material even after his loss | ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37103 Posts
soO2. Dark3. Classic4. INnoVation5. sOs6. Maru7. TY8. GuMiho9. Stats10. Zest | ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On February 27 2018 06:13 Seeker wrote: 1. soO2. Dark3. Classic4. INnoVation5. sOs6. Maru7. TY8. GuMiho9. Stats10. ZestThe 30k post in the community PR, respect! | ||
|
CannedCornn
3 Posts
Classic2. sOs3. soO4. Dark5 INnoVation6. TY7. GuMiho8. Zest9. Stats10. Impact | ||
|
Drfilip
Sweden592 Posts
On February 27 2018 05:40 Penev wrote: 1. Classic2. Dark3. soO4. INnoVation5. sOs6. Stats7. Maru8. TY9. GuMiho10. TrapShould they? I still think + Show Spoiler + Stats Since the dead-line is tomorrow and you are to submit your players in IEM, I thought that you should only include players that are still in the IEM at the dead-line. An analogy: it seems strange to me to say that INnoVation is the best player in the code S. He is knocked out now, but he was participating earlier. At the moment + Show Spoiler + Stats | ||
|
sneakyfox
8217 Posts
Dark2. Classic3. INnoVation4. sOs5. TY6. soO7. Stats8. Impact9. Zest10. Solar | ||
|
Azhrak
Finland1198 Posts
INnoVation2. Classic3. Dark4. soO5. TY6. sOs7. GuMiho8. Serral9. Rogue10. Elazer | ||
|
Musicus
Germany23579 Posts
 . | ||
|
Penev
28536 Posts
On February 27 2018 18:27 Drfilip wrote: Since the dead-line is tomorrow and you are to submit your players in IEM, I thought that you should only include players that are still in the IEM at the dead-line. An analogy: it seems strange to me to say that INnoVation is the best player in the code S. He is knocked out now, but he was participating earlier. At the moment + Show Spoiler + Stats The deadline should have been before the whole tournament. The OP, The_Red_Viper, really dropped the ball this time | ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On February 27 2018 20:27 Penev wrote: The deadline should have been before the whole tournament. The OP, The_Red_Viper, really dropped the ball this time It maybe should have been, but i really wanted to do it after gsl ro16 is done for example. Now people can include the resuls of the open brackets for their list as well if they want to, which is only one aspect though and i don't agree with "he is out he cannot be the in a PR for the event anymore". The best player definitely could lose before with bad luck, etc. | ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
Classic2. Dark3. sOs4. soO5. Maru6. INnoVation 7. Zest8. Scarlett9. Stats10. TY | ||
|
Mun_Su
France2063 Posts
On February 25 2018 03:23 Mun_Su wrote: 1. INnoVation2. Classic3. Dark4. sOs5. soO6. TY7. Zest8. Solar9. GuMiho10. SerralI updated mine, Stats is now out. I also took Rogue out. I bring in Solar and Zest, they impressed me. My new list is now updated. I will be joy if Classic and INno face each other in the final | ||
|
Drfilip
Sweden592 Posts
On February 27 2018 23:18 The_Red_Viper wrote: It maybe should have been, but i really wanted to do it after gsl ro16 is done for example. Now people can include the resuls of the open brackets for their list as well if they want to, which is only one aspect though and i don't agree with "he is out he cannot be the in a PR for the event anymore". The best player definitely could lose before with bad luck, etc. I thought you set the dead-line this late in order for people to read the TL staff PR before making up their own mind, not for them to include the results of the open bracket. Also, I like your sentiment regarding good players being knocked out. Losing a couple of games doesn't mean that they are losing their touch. No player has a 100% win rate. Byun was close with his 30+ straight wins in 2016, not a single game lost in official matches. A 70% win rate is awesome. A 71% win rate was possible for losers in the open bracket. 1-2 loss in the first round. 2-0 wins until losers' bracket final. 1-2 loss to be knocked out. 10-4 game record and still losing. + Show Spoiler + Bunny had a 9-4 record and Scarlett had a 9-5 record while losing. 69% and 64% respectively. Compare that to the qualified players from the losers' bracket (winners' bracket had only 3 matches): Ryung 8-4 67% True 8-6 57% SpeCial 9-4 69% Neeb 10-4 71% Bunny and Scarlett were quite close to these players in win percentage. Mean for Bunny and Scarlett: 67% Mean for Ryung, True, SpeCial and Neeb: 66% True had so many 2-1 series. He made the mean of advancing players go below the mean of these two non-advancing players. | ||
|
D-light
Finland7364 Posts
Classic2. Dark 3. sOs4. INnoVation5. Maru6. TY7. GuMiho8. Serral9. Zest10. Solar | ||
|
leublix
493 Posts
Maru2. Classic3. Dark4. INnoVation5. TY6. sOs7. Zest8. Solar9. Serral10. GuMiho | ||
|
| ||
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
C L A S S I C Writers > Community | ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
It's also not completely worthless either way because strictly speaking the event starts tomorrow (though ideally i would have liked it to have been out before the open qualifiers as well) The problem with the community PR is that i have to give people enough time to make up their mind, otherwise i get like 10 lists. Again, this is no competition either | ||
| ||
