EPT
[Live] WESG Groups C & D
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
Olli
Austria24417 Posts
| ||
|
blunderfulguy
United States1415 Posts
| ||
|
LongShot27
United States2084 Posts
I hope those Chinese numbers are in the 6 digits | ||
|
Parrek
United States893 Posts
On January 13 2017 13:12 LongShot27 wrote: 400k tournament with a whopping 4k viewers...we are a terrible community I hope those Chinese numbers are in the 6 digits IIRC, Counterstrike was at like 12k for theirs. At least it was when I glanced. Definitely wasn't the super high number you would have expected. | ||
|
Aegwynn
Italy460 Posts
On January 13 2017 13:12 LongShot27 wrote: 400k tournament with a whopping 4k viewers...we are a terrible community I hope those Chinese numbers are in the 6 digits More like terrible production for a 400k tournament. 1- Bad play times 2- Half of the games are not even getting casted, there is no B stream 3- Stream gets half hour breaks randomly between series 4- I didn't even see a face of a player yet don't know when there will be a game on a stage. 5- There is not a proper schedule, series get played in random order, we never know which series when | ||
|
Comedy
455 Posts
On January 13 2017 13:43 Aegwynn wrote: More like terrible production for a 400k tournament. 1- Bad play times 2- Half of the games are not even getting casted, there is no B stream 3- Stream gets half hour breaks randomly between series 4- I didn't even see a face of a player yet don't know when there will be a game on a stage. 5- There is not a proper schedule, series get played in random order, we never know which series when Honestly dude, it doesn't fucking matter. All that money....it's a great oppurtunity for the players. It doesn't need to be a perfect viewing experience for that to be awesome enough in it's own right to warrent a whole lot more people than 4k turning on the stream and leaving it idle for all I care :\ | ||
|
Kevin_Sorbo
Canada3217 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On January 13 2017 14:06 Comedy wrote: Honestly dude, it doesn't fucking matter. All that money....it's a great oppurtunity for the players. It doesn't need to be a perfect viewing experience for that to be awesome enough in it's own right to warrent a whole lot more people than 4k turning on the stream and leaving it idle for all I care :\ well it's great regardless but stream numbers definitely matter to encourage sponsor participation in future tournaments | ||
|
Olli
Austria24417 Posts
On January 13 2017 14:42 Kevin_Sorbo wrote: can Scarlett access TL to browse the thread from the other side of the chinese firewall? Yes, TL isn't blocked by China | ||
|
Kevin_Sorbo
Canada3217 Posts
gogo Scarlett. Show em whos boss. | ||
|
Kevin_Sorbo
Canada3217 Posts
| ||
|
Asturas
Finland587 Posts
| ||
|
Olli
Austria24417 Posts
On January 13 2017 16:23 Asturas wrote: Who won in Neeb vs Elazer game? Liquipedia shows Neeb, stream shows Elazer. Liquipedia is correct, Neeb 2-0 Elazer | ||
|
Asturas
Finland587 Posts
Thank you! Well, I was hoping for Elazer, but I think he should come out of the group anyway  | ||
|
Sluskis
Sweden16 Posts
On January 13 2017 16:27 Asturas wrote: Thank you! Well, I was hoping for Elazer, but I think he should come out of the group anyway I dont think Elazer will make it out of the group. I think Neeb, Scarlett and iAsonu will advance Edit: I forgot about MajOr. I'd put MajOr over Elazer too atm... | ||
|
maitiky
Czech Republic54 Posts
| ||
|
ArtyK
France3143 Posts
On January 13 2017 21:29 maitiky wrote: Can anyone explain to me why is Elazer going to the Ro12 instead of MajOr? They both are 3-2 (W-L), both have map score 7-6 and MajOr defeated Elazer 2-1... so why it's not MajOr on the 3rd spot in their group? Scarlett MajOr and Elazer are tied in game won/loss, so then they look at head to head between those 3 : Scarlett 2-0 MajOr who 2-1 Elazer who beats Scarlett 2-1, that's a tie again, then we look at map scores from games between the 3 and Elazer goes through with a 3-3 vs MajOr's 2-3 | ||
|
maitiky
Czech Republic54 Posts
 On January 13 2017 21:31 ArtyK wrote: Scarlett MajOr and Elazer are tied in game won/loss, so then they look at head to head between those 3 : Scarlett 2-0 MajOr who 2-1 Elazer who beats Scarlett 2-1, that's a tie again, then we look at map scores from games between the 3 and Elazer goes through with a 3-3 vs MajOr's 2-3 Thanks!  | ||
|
tantalus
69 Posts
| ||
|
Elentos
55463 Posts
On January 13 2017 23:04 tantalus wrote: How did Showtime not advance in first when he had a better map score than TY and tied in number of sets won/lost? The first tie breaker is head-to-head and TY beat Showtime. | ||
| ||
