EPT[GSL] Code S S1 Ro32 Groups Announced - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
WGT-Baal
France3494 Posts
| ||
Inflicted
Australia18228 Posts
aLive's TvZ has looked good and he beat Bbyong in PL & SSL qualis Dark's ZvT is great but his ZvZ is probably worse than Losira's Bbyong hasn't been too great in LotV but he's good at preparation | ||
|
esdf
Croatia736 Posts
| ||
|
ShizzK
3 Posts
| ||
|
SmykuToronto
Poland269 Posts
| ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
| ||
|
ejozl
Denmark3504 Posts
 | ||
|
Cyanocyst
2222 Posts
| ||
|
Empirimancer
Canada1024 Posts
| ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37095 Posts
| ||
nimdil
Poland3764 Posts
| ||
|
JonnySC2
Germany119 Posts
Stork has a really good shot in his group. Would love to see him in the Ro16. | ||
|
Vortun
42 Posts
| ||
|
RKC
2848 Posts
On February 11 2016 22:02 opisska wrote: Yeah, surely, A and H are groups of death ... the death of common sense when it comes to evaluating TL players on TL. Yeah, seriously, so much TL and emotional bias. Taeja and HerO haven't proven themselves yet in LotV and were in the wilderness in 2015. DRG is another sentimental favourite that isn't top-notch. Group B and G are arguably deadlier. Dark and aLive are all proven players in LotV. herO and Dream haven't lost much of their momentum from HoTS 2015 (as opposed to, say, Inno). Losira and Leenock have been rather impressive too. I said 'arguably', because I can still understand people voting objectively for Groups A and H. But such lopsided results? Meh... nothing but bias. (Between the 4 groups, I would rate the deadliness in such order: G-B-H-A) Not being bitter here, just that this reaffirms my belief that the opinions of TL writers and posters (expressed here and elsewhere) can lack objectivity. Then again, it's no different from any sports fan community. It's normal to be bias | ||
BisuDagger
Bisutopia19367 Posts
 Cure != SpeedThis one is messing with me. How is one man so amazing that he gets two team rosters and to code S spots? | ||
|
zealotstim
United States455 Posts
| ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On February 12 2016 00:43 zealotstim wrote: Just wondering how group a is considered a group of death when rogue and zest are massive favorites to make it out. I always thought group of death was supposed to be at least hard to predict in its result. All the Taeja fanboys voting apparently | ||
|
Elentos
55581 Posts
On February 12 2016 00:41 BisuDagger wrote: Cure != SpeedThis one is messing with me. How is one man so amazing that he gets two team rosters and to code S spots? Cure = Speed != SpeeDMvP | ||
|
alukarD
Mexico396 Posts
| ||
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
On February 12 2016 00:05 RKC wrote: Yeah, seriously, so much TL and emotional bias. Taeja and HerO haven't proven themselves yet in LotV and were in the wilderness in 2015. DRG is another sentimental favourite that isn't top-notch. Group B and G are arguably deadlier. Dark and aLive are all proven players in LotV. herO and Dream haven't lost much of their momentum from HoTS 2015 (as opposed to, say, Inno). Losira and Leenock have been rather impressive too. I said 'arguably', because I can still understand people voting objectively for Groups A and H. But such lopsided results? Meh... nothing but bias. (Between the 4 groups, I would rate the deadliness in such order: G-B-H-A) Not being bitter here, just that this reaffirms my belief that the opinions of TL writers and posters (expressed here and elsewhere) can lack objectivity. Then again, it's no different from any sports fan community. It's normal to be bias This whole "TL writers Liquid bias" thing is so nonsensical it's incredible. I'm the only one on our sc2 writing staff that's actually a Liquid fan, and I dare you to find an article of mine that lacks objectivity in favor of TL. | ||
| ||
