|
Northern Ireland25932 Posts
On November 21 2013 22:53 DarkLordOlli wrote:
SH and forcefields can't even be compared. Forcefields are not free, they're an ability and can be circumvented, broken through, etc. Locusts are free units. What. You're just making the comparison because you don't like either design.
Also wth, I would never harm the wizard
Of course not, the search for the culprit continues!
It's nothing to do with the 'free units' that annoy me about the SH. They are part of it mind.
It's that it's so clearly they looked at the Lurker, didn't just include the Lurker (with some tweaks for SC2) and made something like the lurker, intended to fulfil similar roles that just doesn't.
1 or 2 swarm hosts should be able to be burrowed in expos, on ramps and act as deterrents for things like Zealot runbys, but they don't do anything at all in such small numbers. What do you get when a unit is slow, has high DPS potential, high range and is only good when it hits a critical mass, and needs babysat? A unit that far from encouraging space control in strategic locations, with small numbers of SH in defensive positions, is FAR better used with the turtle/static D combination.
That they spawn units isn't a big deal vP, but is a bit of a pain for Terran as they set off mines and tank siege tank splash etc, but that's not inherently bad I guess.
|
On November 21 2013 23:34 Wombat_NI wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2013 22:53 DarkLordOlli wrote:
SH and forcefields can't even be compared. Forcefields are not free, they're an ability and can be circumvented, broken through, etc. Locusts are free units. What. You're just making the comparison because you don't like either design.
Also wth, I would never harm the wizard Of course not, the search for the culprit continues! It's nothing to do with the 'free units' that annoy me about the SH. They are part of it mind. It's that it's so clearly they looked at the Lurker, didn't just include the Lurker (with some tweaks for SC2) and made something like the lurker, intended to fulfil similar roles that just doesn't. 1 or 2 swarm hosts should be able to be burrowed in expos, on ramps and act as deterrents for things like Zealot runbys, but they don't do anything at all in such small numbers. What do you get when a unit is slow, has high DPS potential, high range and is only good when it hits a critical mass, and needs babysat? A unit that far from encouraging space control in strategic locations, with small numbers of SH in defensive positions, is FAR better used with the turtle/static D combination. That they spawn units isn't a big deal vP, but is a bit of a pain for Terran as they set off mines and tank siege tank splash etc, but that's not inherently bad I guess.
I think you have good points overall but Blizzard said from the get go that sh are designed to push your advantage in closing out games. They aren't designed for space control at all.
|
Hmmm that choice of incontrol, I dont get it when you have Demu/Suppy/Xeno. Even if its showmatch playing vs CJ is a good practice. And incontrol isnt rly a progamer anymore :x.
|
On November 22 2013 01:30 SinO[Ob] wrote:
Hmmm that choice of incontrol, I dont get it when you have Demu/Suppy/Xeno. Even if its showmatch playing vs CJ is a good practice. And incontrol isnt rly a progamer anymore :x.
Well it is a showmatch, and it's fun to see Incontrol playing.
|
Thank you based Coach Park
|
On November 22 2013 01:46 Bagration wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2013 01:30 SinO[Ob] wrote:
Hmmm that choice of incontrol, I dont get it when you have Demu/Suppy/Xeno. Even if its showmatch playing vs CJ is a good practice. And incontrol isnt rly a progamer anymore :x. Well it is a showmatch, and it's fun to see Incontrol playing.
Yea so fun seeing incontrol playing like a bad platinum dude. I mean If I want to see that I just go ladder and watch my replay. On this case this is just useless. Let real player plays plz. CJ dont send Effort little sister to play, it is actually Effort.
|
Canada16217 Posts
On November 22 2013 02:00 SinO[Ob] wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2013 01:46 Bagration wrote:On November 22 2013 01:30 SinO[Ob] wrote:
Hmmm that choice of incontrol, I dont get it when you have Demu/Suppy/Xeno. Even if its showmatch playing vs CJ is a good practice. And incontrol isnt rly a progamer anymore :x. Well it is a showmatch, and it's fun to see Incontrol playing. Yea so fun seeing incontrol playing like a bad platinum dude. I mean If I want to see that I just go ladder and watch my replay. On this case this is just useless. Let real player plays plz. CJ dont send Effort little sister to play, it is actually Effort.
don't exaggerate. he's better than you ever will be.
|
On November 22 2013 02:02 NovemberstOrm wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2013 02:00 SinO[Ob] wrote:On November 22 2013 01:46 Bagration wrote:On November 22 2013 01:30 SinO[Ob] wrote:
Hmmm that choice of incontrol, I dont get it when you have Demu/Suppy/Xeno. Even if its showmatch playing vs CJ is a good practice. And incontrol isnt rly a progamer anymore :x. Well it is a showmatch, and it's fun to see Incontrol playing. Yea so fun seeing incontrol playing like a bad platinum dude. I mean If I want to see that I just go ladder and watch my replay. On this case this is just useless. Let real player plays plz. CJ dont send Effort little sister to play, it is actually Effort. don't exaggerate. he's better than you ever will be.
Of course I exagerate :/, just saying theres other player that needs to level up instead of incontrol. This guy just out of progaming and more a caster now (a good one). And demu/suppy/Xeno could have a good practice in a cool showmatch with not much pressure.
|
|
|
|
|
EffOrt vs InConTroL OMG LOL I have to see this!!!
EDIT : Not because any negative reason, just they both played BW and i'd like to see how this game pans out!
|
|
|
As a player and caster, InControl is great! But, I just don't know why he was playing when there are other foreign EG players who could played. Well, I guess this was a good chance to play professionally, which he really wants to (if you check his MLG 2011 interview)
|
|
|
|
|
On November 22 2013 02:00 SinO[Ob] wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2013 01:46 Bagration wrote:On November 22 2013 01:30 SinO[Ob] wrote:
Hmmm that choice of incontrol, I dont get it when you have Demu/Suppy/Xeno. Even if its showmatch playing vs CJ is a good practice. And incontrol isnt rly a progamer anymore :x. Well it is a showmatch, and it's fun to see Incontrol playing. Yea so fun seeing incontrol playing like a bad platinum dude. I mean If I want to see that I just go ladder and watch my replay. On this case this is just useless. Let real player plays plz. CJ dont send Effort little sister to play, it is actually Effort.
AHHHH, the ignorance. I think what this guy meant to say was iNcontroL is ~top40 GM and about a thousand times better than I'll ever be. You're welcome SinO 
|
|
|
On November 22 2013 16:00 kochanfe wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2013 02:00 SinO[Ob] wrote:On November 22 2013 01:46 Bagration wrote:On November 22 2013 01:30 SinO[Ob] wrote:
Hmmm that choice of incontrol, I dont get it when you have Demu/Suppy/Xeno. Even if its showmatch playing vs CJ is a good practice. And incontrol isnt rly a progamer anymore :x. Well it is a showmatch, and it's fun to see Incontrol playing. Yea so fun seeing incontrol playing like a bad platinum dude. I mean If I want to see that I just go ladder and watch my replay. On this case this is just useless. Let real player plays plz. CJ dont send Effort little sister to play, it is actually Effort. AHHHH, the ignorance. I think what this guy meant to say was iNcontroL is ~top40 GM and about a thousand times better than I'll ever be. You're welcome SinO
Yep, sometimes it's just hard to get your message across :D
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
