WCS Korea Player Stats - Page 3

coverpunch

United States2093 Posts

July 01 2013 12:35 GMT

#41

Well, they say this is what the Korean e-sports media rates each player, so it is a subjective, arbitrary scale that should be used more for entertainment purposes than fact. It's the same thing that the AP takes a survey of reporters around the US and uses it to rank college football teams. As people have said, it's good filler. Not everyone can talk about their high school experiences like Tastosis.

EDIT: Here's hoping one day they take prominent foreign casters' opinions one day and aggregate them.

Maxilicious

221 Posts

July 02 2013 14:26 GMT

#42

Updated with 8 of the 16 players from Ro16.

AxionSteel

United States7754 Posts

July 02 2013 14:32 GMT

#43

Can't believe Bomber scored so poorly in macro, yet Fantasy scored so well. Can't agree with those ratings at all.

Darkhorse

United States23455 Posts

July 02 2013 14:41 GMT

#44

Popularity seems pretty skewed, but I think this rating system is fun! I like it!

asdfOu

United States2089 Posts

July 02 2013 14:44 GMT

#45

ehh the popularity part seems really off imo

archonOOid

1983 Posts

July 02 2013 14:54 GMT

#46

gief me dem cards plx, lol
Seriously I would start to pick up TCG if such cards existed for wcs Korea/GSL and the other wcs leagues. A great opportunity for merchandising and way to expand the starcraft to a new audience.

MockHamill

Sweden1798 Posts

July 02 2013 17:32 GMT

#47

Those rating categories are not very useful for predicting winners. I think just using Macro, Micro and Decision making is more useful.

MVP
Macro: 80/100
Micro: 80/100
Decision making: 90/100

Idra
Macro: 80/100
Micro: 60/10
Decision making: 50/100

Boxer:
Macro: 70/100
Micro: 90/100
Decision making: 70/100

LockeTazeline

2390 Posts

July 02 2013 18:05 GMT

#48

Lol, and then Bomber macro goes down further while Fantasy's goes up.

(I think these ratings are really cool, but some of the numbers are definitely amusing)

tili

United States1332 Posts

July 02 2013 18:11 GMT

#49

I would love to know how they specifically define each of these categories.

mongmong

Korea (South)1389 Posts

July 02 2013 18:21 GMT

#50

Heh.. i wouldnt take these stats too seriously... but Bomber macro is just way too low

lorestarcraft

United States1049 Posts

July 02 2013 18:22 GMT

#51

Madden rating for sc2? nice..

Dontkillme

Korea (South)806 Posts

July 02 2013 18:30 GMT

#52

All these number stats remind me of Pokemon

Cirqueenflex

499 Posts

July 02 2013 18:31 GMT

#53

haha Flash has lowest stat of them all. Cheese at 45. Had a good laugh, thanks OP for the weird stats put into tables

Bam Lee

2336 Posts

July 02 2013 18:36 GMT

#54

Rain is definitely a 90+ at defense :O

Wonder what strategy stands for?

.kv

United States2332 Posts

July 02 2013 18:49 GMT

#55

The stats for Rain does not do him justice lol
He deserves better than this

Paragleiber

413 Posts

July 02 2013 18:53 GMT

#56

http://terrancraft.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/wcs-player-stats-ro16-group-d.jpg?w=593&h=336
I think Losira +5 should be +15 (or one of the other numbers is wrong).

xsnac

Barbados1365 Posts

July 02 2013 18:56 GMT

#57

whats the point of this sistem if nobody has 100 in popularity ...

HolydaKing

21254 Posts

July 02 2013 19:04 GMT

#58

dont quite understand why bbyong won points and bomber lost (over all), though i didnt watch the games.

Maxilicious

221 Posts

July 02 2013 19:19 GMT

#59

On July 03 2013 03:53 Paragleiber wrote:
http://terrancraft.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/wcs-player-stats-ro16-group-d.jpg?w=593&h=336
I think Losira +5 should be +15 (or one of the other numbers is wrong).

Thanks. Updated.

v0rtex

123 Posts

July 02 2013 19:25 GMT

#60

Thanks, been looking for these. When i first heard of the OSL player stats and saw them I thought they were rubbish but they seem somewhat reputable with how the OSL Ro16 has turned out.

Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All

Please or register to reply.

WCS Korea Player Stats - Page 3

Completed

Ongoing

Upcoming