EPT<3
SC2 Power Rank - June 2013 - Page 32
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
]343[
United States10328 Posts
<3 | ||
|
forumtext
575 Posts
 | ||
|
docvoc
United States5491 Posts
On June 07 2013 10:16 ]343[ wrote: oh how I miss power rank arguments <3 These are the parts of TL that need to be highlighted in pony tales  . | ||
|
Dreamer.T
United States3584 Posts
| ||
|
Daswollvieh
5553 Posts
| ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
yrt123
Singapore1246 Posts
On June 07 2013 17:03 Dreamer.T wrote: So much for Hero ranking above MVP :D. HerO's group > Group Code B | ||
|
NovemberstOrm
Canada16217 Posts
On June 07 2013 17:03 Dreamer.T wrote: So much for Hero ranking above MVP :D. Mvp had the easier group. | ||
|
J1.au
Australia3596 Posts
| ||
|
pylonsalad
Canada649 Posts
| ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9174 Posts
HerO's Game 2 vs sOs = fucking embarrassing | ||
|
Targe
United Kingdom14103 Posts
Thanks monk, thanks others, you're a great guy. | ||
|
RKC
2848 Posts
Points to consider: - Soulkey was a beast towards the end of BW, a contender for individual leagues - Soulkey's recent SPL results are impressive - Soulkey's past GSL runs before this were rather consistent RO8 twice (almost as good as Innovation's). Also, he even 4-0 Life in one of the RO16 games. - Soulkey's overall play in the last GSL may be slightly worse than innovation, but still solid (the game against sOs was a team-kill, and should not really been looked too much into). Hence, I don't think comparing him to Seed, Sniper and Jjajki are fair at all. "And especially in the finals, it seemed as if Innovation had lost the championship rather than that Soulkey had won it" - I don't agree with this 'perception' (which I have explained many times in my previous posts). And even if it was true that Innovation had lost the championship, then this sole important factor disqualifies him from being Number 1. Ultimately, I feel that the reasons given to justify Innovation being Number 1, and Soulkey being Number 2, rather unsatisfactory. My suggestion for future PR write-ups is make it short and simple, and cut out unnecessary, controversial subjective views. Whilst PR should provoke debate, I think PR should also remain fair and reasonable in the justifications made. That said, I look forward for the next PR. | ||
|
tadL
Croatia679 Posts
| ||
|
1raxexpand
United States165 Posts
Well he wasn't supposed to be raped by forGG. And Symbol is pretty easy. But that was very funny lol | ||
monk
United States8477 Posts
On June 08 2013 01:50 RKC wrote: I think the battle for number 1 spot is debatable. I have no issue of it going to Innovation, but like some of the others here, I did not quite like the write-up on Soulkey, which I felt were rather demeaning, and unnecessary. Points to consider: - Soulkey was a beast towards the end of BW, a contender for individual leagues - Soulkey's recent SPL results are impressive - Soulkey's past GSL runs before this were rather consistent RO8 twice (almost as good as Innovation's). Also, he even 4-0 Life in one of the RO16 games. - Soulkey's overall play in the last GSL may be slightly worse than innovation, but still solid (the game against sOs was a team-kill, and should not really been looked too much into). Hence, I don't think comparing him to Seed, Sniper and Jjajki are fair at all. "And especially in the finals, it seemed as if Innovation had lost the championship rather than that Soulkey had won it" - I don't agree with this 'perception' (which I have explained many times in my previous posts). And even if it was true that Innovation had lost the championship, then this sole important factor disqualifies him from being Number 1. Ultimately, I feel that the reasons given to justify Innovation being Number 1, and Soulkey being Number 2, rather unsatisfactory. My suggestion for future PR write-ups is make it short and simple, and cut out unnecessary, controversial subjective views. Whilst PR should provoke debate, I think PR should also remain fair and reasonable in the justifications made. That said, I look forward for the next PR. Fair enough. The intent wasn't to demean Soulkey but rather to justify Innovation #1/Soulkey #2. It just didn't come out the way I intended it to. On June 08 2013 03:52 tadL wrote: In Dota ranks you have been able to rank mouz and you on 3. Why are you not able to rank Soulkey and Inovation on 1 too? Cause we(SC2 writing staff) can make the hard decisions, unlike the TL Dota writing staff. Boom, shots fired. | ||
|
RKC
2848 Posts
On June 08 2013 06:32 monk wrote: Fair enough. The intent wasn't to demean Soulkey but rather to justify Innovation #1/Soulkey #2. It just didn't come out the way I intended it to. Cause we(SC2 writing staff) can make the hard decisions, unlike the TL Dota writing staff. Boom, shots fired. Sorry to focus on the negatives, monk. Everything else was fine, and I thoroughly enjoyed it. It isn't easy stating bold predictions, and strong opinions. Keep it up! P.S. I hope it's not a ForGG v Alicia finals for WCS Global, for your sake - that would be a great headache writing the next PR lol | ||
|
bhfberserk
Canada390 Posts
GO KING OF WINGS! | ||
|
Magbane
Finland95 Posts
Also Flash is highly overrated in that power rank, he is not even close to being third best player in the starcraft 2 right now. The flash bias is so ridicilous. What is the point of this "power rank" because this is not objective analysis at all about who is the best player currently. | ||
| ||
