now that's a sick admin decision
jesus christ, nasl probably should have run this thing. they've run large scale online qualifiers before without being this fucking stupid, right?
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Jehct
New Zealand9115 Posts
now that's a sick admin decision jesus christ, nasl probably should have run this thing. they've run large scale online qualifiers before without being this fucking stupid, right? | ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
| ||
Corrosive
Canada3741 Posts
why the fuck did they just dq him now | ||
jubil
United States2602 Posts
However, Should Diamond-leaguers et al. have an opportunity to play in this tournament? Yes, that's how new blood rises up, which is what the entire point of qualifiers is. Should MLG disqualify a contestant that uses another players ID if the original player has already played games in this tournament? Yes, and it shouldn't matter who it was that did it. | ||
![]()
Fionn
United States23455 Posts
| ||
chadissilent
Canada1187 Posts
Easiest solution? Expand the brackets to match the amount of people registered and checked in. ESL did it (as high as RO2048), why can't MLG? | ||
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
On April 22 2013 08:40 jubil wrote: Should Comm have gotten a spot to compete in the first place? Yes, he's an established progamer. However, Should Diamond-leaguers et al. have an opportunity to play in this tournament? Yes, that's how new blood rises up, which is what the entire point of qualifiers is. Should MLG disqualify a contestant that uses another players ID if the original player has already played games in this tournament? Yes, and it shouldn't matter who it was that did it. The original player did not play any games in this tournament, every game was Comm. | ||
Killmouse
Austria5700 Posts
mlg is a joke company ![]() | ||
KanoCoke
Japan863 Posts
| ||
Traceback
United States469 Posts
On April 22 2013 08:41 Dodgin wrote: Show nested quote + On April 22 2013 08:40 jubil wrote: Should Comm have gotten a spot to compete in the first place? Yes, he's an established progamer. However, Should Diamond-leaguers et al. have an opportunity to play in this tournament? Yes, that's how new blood rises up, which is what the entire point of qualifiers is. Should MLG disqualify a contestant that uses another players ID if the original player has already played games in this tournament? Yes, and it shouldn't matter who it was that did it. The original player did not play any games in this tournament, every game was Comm. Exactly, the Chinese amateur simply donated his spot in the tournament to Comm before he played any games. | ||
![]()
Fionn
United States23455 Posts
| ||
Assirra
Belgium4169 Posts
On April 22 2013 08:40 jubil wrote: Should Comm have gotten a spot to compete in the first place? Yes, he's an established progamer. However, Should Diamond-leaguers et al. have an opportunity to play in this tournament? Yes, that's how new blood rises up, which is what the entire point of qualifiers is. Should MLG disqualify a contestant that uses another players ID if the original player has already played games in this tournament? Yes, and it shouldn't matter who it was that did it. Should MLG have taken this a bit more serious instead of a quick cashgrab (hello sign in fees that got removed and everything pressed in 1day and still lacking admins)? Yes. | ||
ch33psh33p
7650 Posts
| ||
Gevna
France2332 Posts
Blizzard choosing ESL and MLG really screwed the qualifiers. Still MLG are kind to ESL, showing there are a lot of ways to fuck everything up. | ||
Eggi
478 Posts
this is actually sad as hell and I am happy I didnt waste time to play in them | ||
Benjamin99
4176 Posts
Blizzard should have seen MLG simply cant handle it and should have got NASL to help them. Personally I think the hole qualifier should be remade. Hackers and people not eligible to play kicked out many players. The hole thing is a mess | ||
Wertheron
France439 Posts
On April 22 2013 08:40 jubil wrote: Should MLG disqualify a contestant that uses another players ID if the original player has already played games in this tournament? Yes, and it shouldn't matter who it was that did it. Original Fruitbasket didn't play a game and gave his account at the beginning. Comm say that too: ![]() | ||
Thrax
Canada1755 Posts
On April 22 2013 08:40 jubil wrote: Should MLG disqualify a contestant that uses another players ID if the original player has already played games in this tournament? Yes, and it shouldn't matter who it was that did it. Only Comm has played on the account. FruitBasket did not play a single game in this tournament. | ||
![]()
ZeromuS
Canada13389 Posts
On April 22 2013 08:43 Fionn wrote: Fruitsbasket never played. He saw that Comm got shafted, gave him the spot, and Comm just played all the games under another ID. The only case you can make is that players would have prepared differently if they knew they were facing Comm instead of a random guy, but I'm pretty sure 99.9% of the people in the tournament have no fucking clue what is going on in the Chinese scene. FruitsBasket should have used his name change and made himself |||||||||||| | ||
larse
1611 Posts
Source: http://bbs.neotv.cn/data/attachment/forum/201304/21/044026usjmh8va8kccnaav.jpg http://bbs.neotv.cn/data/attachment/forum/201304/21/044034bwnzvvrb2ajlrinv.jpg | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Calm Dota 2![]() Shuttle ![]() ggaemo ![]() Soulkey ![]() Mini ![]() Larva ![]() BeSt ![]() firebathero ![]() Barracks ![]() hero ![]() [ Show more ] League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations |
OSC
WardiTV Summer Champion…
WardiTV Summer Champion…
PiGosaur Monday
WardiTV Summer Champion…
Stormgate Nexus
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
The PondCast
WardiTV Summer Champion…
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] LiuLi Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
RSL Revival
RSL Revival
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Sparkling Tuna Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Wardi Open
RotterdaM Event
|
|