• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:10
CEST 14:10
KST 21:10
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed17Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Who will win EWC 2025? Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Soulkey Muta Micro Map? [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 647 users

Fungals, FF, Storms, and Smart-casting

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 12 13 14 Next All
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11349 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-21 07:28:29
November 21 2012 02:16 GMT
#1
Hello! I've decided to venture out from quiet blog land with this latest thread and see how it goes.

Background:
It seems that while I've been slowly putting together these videos over the last week or so, several threads have cropped up expressing a similar concerns have cropped up

A fundamental issue about forcefield -Morrow

And there were a whole bunch of Fungal threads, but this the one that pushed me to get a move on organizing my thoughts and planning this next one out:

Fixing Forcefield, Fungal Growth and Vortex -kcdc


Also from the latest Browder video, it seems that that they are leaning towards making Fungal a projectile. I think that could probably help. There may be a variety of solutions to the problem. However, I think many of these complaints speak to a far broader problem that underlies the spell system of SC2.

A major underlying problem is that the spells are simply too prevalent in SC2 game-play. Spell casters that can limit the movement on the other side are playing too great a role in SC2's battles.

Before spells were icing on the cake. We had the foundation of a much slower economy (no maxing on a few bases at 12 minutes), units that weren't a-move by design and strong defender's advantage that led to very positional game. And the spells were the icing. The moments of spectacle that stood out from the strong foundations. However, now spells are having to do the heavy lifting to make the game interesting due to an extremely fast maxing and remaxing economy/ macro mechanics and minimized defender's advantage, and sluggish unit handling.

Our cake is made mostly of icing and while icing is good, it's a bit much.

[image loading]
Pretty tasty, but we might just get sick of it.

The domination of these sorts of spells on SC2 game play is due in large part by how easy it is to cast off a whole bunch at once. Think about any spell that is a problem. From Fungals to Force fields, what if there was a way to have a whole lot less of them? Would they be so much of a problem then?

It is time to take another look at Smart Casting. Similar to my Overkill blog, I'd like to make the case that Smart Casting is not truly smart or at the very least that it is a design choice with different implications rather than it simply being the 'smarter' option.

There are many consequences intended and unintended by adding Smart Casting. I will look at three major areas.
1) Spells that do damage
2) Spells that restrict movement
3) View-ability/ Spectating.

I do have Cliff Notes spoiler underneath. There are a couple additional points that I didn't address in my videos. These I'll indicate with red.

A Plead/Caution
Please hold off on the "fighting against the game/interface" argument. Just temporarily put it aside and read the OP and if it still applies, then I guess have at it.

The reason why I want you to hold off is because spell-casters are already a conscious choice to make the game more difficult. We don't have to have spell-casters at all in an RTS. Adding spell-casters intentionally adds a unit that does NOT have have an automated attack and REQUIRES you to manually cast or it will be in-effective. We are adding difficulty to the game on purpose simply by designing spell-casters.

If you want to talk about fighting against the interface, start there. Because the question is not whether we are making the game difficult with Smart casting or not, but to what extent? And then what is the consequences on the game-play of adding so-called Smart casting vs not having it?

What is Smart-Casting?
Smart-casting disallows simultaneous casting. In BW, if you have a group of casters selected, you hit cast a spell, all will fire off their spells. If they are grouped together, the spells will go off in the same area. If they are selected when spread, the spells will go off spread out. (Magic Box casting.) If some spell casters are further behind, the spells may be staggerd. More on this in my videos.

SC2, if you have a group of casters, you cast only one will go off no matter what. You must click the ground repeatedly to get them to cast. Thus hold 'f' and spam click to get a wall of Force-Fields.

1) Damage Casters and Smart-casting.

Part 1


Summary Spoilered + Show Spoiler +

Opening Comparison:
-Nukes- If AoE damage is more easily available, the damage will necessarily be decreased per shot/spell.

Smart-casting- by design spells are more easily available. Therefore, damage is nerfed to individual spells. (See original beta EMP and Storm nerfs.) We don't keep the same spell and it's now smarter. The spell itself must be changed (nerfed) in order to be 'smart.'

Four Implications/ Consequences:

1) Smart-casting, not necessarily easier (or not easy enough for that casual player).
a) We've simply raised the bar for how many storms must be cast in order to get a similar swing in the battle. The spell has been diluted from a few powerful spells to many weaker spells due to smart-casting. The casting requirement has actually gone up to get equivalent game changing damage. It might be somewhat easier, but probably not for the sort of player that couldn't be bothered to get off one or two storms in BW.

b) Also some incentive lost to learn how to cast spells because individually the damage spells don't feel powerful. Learning how to storm faster is addicting in BW because they're so powerful.

2) Diminished Decision Making
-Change from high impact damage, concentrated in limited areas to spells evenly distributed on the screen/ army.
-Fewer spells cast overall, need to make the few count.
-Uneven unit movement (BW) creates targets. Uniform unit movement (SC2) where you place the spell on the army doesn't matter so much. Just place lots of them.

3) Diminished Harassment Potential
-Storm drops/ harassment requires highly concentrated spells in specific locations. With smart-casting, the spell is balanced around the spell easily saturating the entire screen.
-Therefore, storm drops don't work as well as in BW. (This is one of the harass units/ non-deathball units that Blizzard is searching for and it's right under their noses.)
-Yes there is some players that harass, but it's not as prevalent.
-Possibly further issues on how easily warp-prisms can be sniped. Not entirely sure, but smart-casting is a major cause I would argue.



Part 2


Summary Spoilered + Show Spoiler +

4) Mundane Spell-casting
-Anything in LR should be taken with a grain of salt, but as a whole people are far less in awe of spells and can be even derisive of caster hype over good spell casting. People know about the spam clicking.
-Smart-casting spell difficulty is a fairly linear increase.
-Without spell-casting, the difficulty is exponential. The excitement is comparably exponential because many, many spells casted is a rare, special event.
-Spells also retain their damage and are therefore all the more exciting.

Final Thoughts
-4 Story House Analogy
- Wire-frame casting, Clone casting, and Magic Box casting.
-Smart-casting is actually slower than Magic Box casting which is simultaneous casting. (aka it is a feature that actually gets in the way of the better players.) I suppose the closest you can get is shift-click casting, but it's still sequential casting.

Spells on Defence
-I actually am starting to think that non-smart-casting allows damage spells to be better for defence. It is far better on defence to have a couple AoE damage spells that immediately knocks out a cluster of the raiders rather than equally damaging the entire raiding force, but killing nothing outright.

It is the same reason why target firing is so effective and why you want to pull back damaged units. Damaging 10 units equally that continue firing is less strong than killing two units completely so there is only 8 firing back. Damaged units do as much units as full health damage, so it is better to kill a few than damage all, but kill none. Smart-casting units are balanced around how easy it is to get off all the spells in a hurry so the individual spell damage is less and it is harder to kill units outright.

Without smart-casting, I'm starting to think, spell-casters would actually operate better outside of the deathball and be able to hold their own behind defensive positions in outlying expansions.


2) Spells that Restrict Unit Movement



Summary Spoilered + Show Spoiler +

-Unit Design- microbility is limited. (See this blog A-Move By Design if you're unsure what I mean. I now have a tldr version.) In short. The issue is burst damage and how quickly a unit can transition from attacking and moving.
-Therefore, to make units interesting, spells and abilities are added to even greater numbers of units.

-Spells/Abilities in Question: Fungal, Forcefield, Graviton Beam, Time Warp, Concussive Shell, and Vortex (although Vortex is unique.)
-BW has same sorts of spells, but they do not dominate the game-play near as much because it's harder to use.

-Smart casting creates a compositional imbalance for these sorts of spells where they have too great an impact on the game-play

- Who Controls Your Army? These spells are primarily about you controlling your opponent's units rather than you control your own units better while I control my units better. The more dominant these sorts of spells are in game-play, the more frustrating the game becomes. Too much control of your units goes to your opponent.

-Spell Domination is the Problem The spells themselves may not be bad, but smart-casting makes it too dominant regardless of whether the game has balanced with this in mind. I mean, I guess SC2 could turn into just a game of Casters preventing each others armies from moving. But I feel this would ultimately be dissatisfying.

Concussive Shell
I never really talked about the marauder, but a passive slow ability is no good in my opinion. It directly impacts the other players ability to micro without gaining any appreciable micro by the Terran. Yes it's easier to stutter step that way, but a far superior method is to play with burst damage, and the delay between attacking and moving again. This allows the Terran unit to micro better, but allows their opponent to continue micro-ing. Passive slow abilities diminishes micro in one of the worst possible way. Think about it this way- stalker vs marine micro in the early game. How can the Terran counter? Just upgrade a spell and buy your way past the micro war and you can now trap retreating stalkers with a slow. Not much additional micro required.


3) Smart-casting and Spectating


I used annotations to clarify a couple points.

Summary Spoilered + Show Spoiler +

I briefly mentioned WoW and MOBA games in the problem of clutter. Here it is expanded.

WoW example:
Blizzcon 2011 Tourney

There's a lot of spells going down, but it's difficult to discern the individual parts of the battle beyond that there are a lot of spells.

League of Legends example

Specifically Team Fights. I say this as someone who plays League of Legends, but Team Fights are very cluttered due to the number of spells and abilities going down. When I first started, I'd actually lose track of where my character was. Maybe for that reason I, to this day, prefer ranged units that stay on the periphery of the battle. You can tell that spells are going down, but if you sit down and are a casual or have never played, Team Fights are going to look extremely confusing. 30:40 is another Team Fight

In both cases, you can learn what's going on. But it's not as easy to just pick up watching due to the amount of stuff going on. It's just a bit overwhelming.

-Spells are good, but add extra information. Therefore diminishing returns for every extra spells we add.
-We could probably add 10 attack-retreat type micro for every 1 spell simply in regards to clarity.
-Important for spectating- that spells are obvious what they do, rather than have weird buffs and debuffs. (Devourers and Consume.)

-The number of spells in BW is deceptive as many were not used frequently. This is actually a good thing for view-ability/ clarity. (I used BW spells as non-examples!!!)
-Adding more spells to make things more interesting, combined with smart-casting leads to a very cluttered viewing experience.

-Spells that look very similar- Protoss Bubbles (The Disco race according to ) -FF, Graviton, Time Warp, Guardian Shield.
-FF, Corruption, and Blinding Cloud- all green spells. Corruption in particular is VERY hard to see. And Corruption spell is very difficult to tell what it does differently from other spells just by watching the screen and having no prior knowledge. Fungal and Storm require no prior knowledge to tell what the spell does.

Storm Comparison
I forgot to compare these in my video.
[image loading]
A further thing that adds to the clutter is simply the opaqueness of Psionic Storm. Old as Beta critique. But you simply cannot tell what is underneath. It's a minor issue, but it does contribute to the clutter given how many can be thrown down in a hurry.


Side note on Vortex - I mentioned Vortex is a different category and it really is.
+ Show Spoiler +
The mothership' problem is not smart-casting. Its problem is it is TOO rare and TOO powerful. This is nothing new as it goes back to the old 'hero unit' complaint. It's bad not due to balance. It's bad because it swings the battle too much one way or the other depending on whether Vortex goes off for the Protoss or whether Neural uses it against the Protoss. Although admittedly, Zerg no longer even needs to counter Neural Vortex the Protoss. But the alternative is almost worse- the game grinding to halt as try to adjust and re-adjust to exactly the right position.

It has become a linchpin unit and its use or misuse swings the battle too far in any direction. This doesn't create an exciting situation because it actually promotes caution and passivity. The players know the power and how fast the battle can swing due to Vortex. Therefore, the engagement is delayed and they reposition. And delay again and reposition. And so on, and so on. You don't want to make a gutsy move with the mother ship. It's slow and there is only one of it and it takes a long time to rebuild and it's expensive. You want to sit there on top of your one army and play it safe and engage only when you have everything just right.

Similarly, as Zerg, you don't want to make a gutsy move. The Vortex could swallow up half your army (or 2-3 Broodlords that Zerg is better at spreading) and have a bunch of Archons thrown into the toilet. So they sit there behind Broodlord-Infestor cautiously poking around, adjusting and re-adjusting their line. The game comes to a grinding halt with a big stand-off.

It's not ballsy unit and it doesn't promote ballsy play. It's a slow unit that promotes passivity. Hero units have no place and Starcraft and should be stricken out or cut apart and divided into multiple ships with with limited power. I'm glad to see Browder wants to nerf it to oblivion, because this unit needs to disappear and fast.


Conclusion:


There are many threads that have recently appeared that critique the dominant role that Fungals and FF's are having on the game-play This critique has little to do with balance and more to do with spell-casters playing too large a role in the battles. They need to be toned down somehow so that they units go back to being a support unit that is unique and not core army composition.

There may be several solutions to this problem.

However, I believe getting rid of smart-cast would go a long way to solving this issue. Smart-casting was added with good intentions: too make spell-casting easier. However, the intended and unintended consequences are such that I don't think it is actually 'smart.'

Adding spell-casters to a game is by design, intentional difficulty. There are good reasons to keep spell-casting difficult and rare(r).

1) Smart-casting dilutes damage spells.
i) It spreads out the damage on the assumption that more will be cast. This doesn't necessarily make it all that easy for that casual player we are concerned about. It's easier to cast more, but we also moved the bar so they must cast more. We dropped the damage so the individual spell is less satisfying.
ii) Individual spell placement is less important as they are more spread over a wider area.
iii) This impacts damage casters as harass units because harassment requires rapid damage in concentrated areas. Not spread out over the screen.
iv) And we turn spell casting into a mundane affair rather than a spectacular event.

2) Smart-casting makes locking down armies far to easy.
i) This type of spell/ ability is not bad on its own, but smart-casting allows the spell a too dominant position.
ii) It becomes more about controlling your enemy's units rather than you controlling your own units better. (Better attack-retreat micro would alleviate this need for so many spells.)
iii) The greater role these sorts of spells have on the game-play, the more frustrating the game becomes to play. Otherwise it becomes a game of Casters preventing each others armies from moving.


3) Smart-casting (and adding more and more spells) means that it is much more likely that the screen becomes far too cluttered with many different spells.
-I would argue this is one of the reasons that WoW arenas and MOBA team battles are not as good a viewing experience.
-SC2 is pushing into this zone with the number of spells and the frequency they are used.
-Certain spells are not very obvious what they do and are therefore not good for spectating.
-Making similar looking spells is also not ideal.

Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
November 21 2012 02:23 GMT
#2
Well written, though I still don't 100% know what smart casting is, beyond that it makes casting spells easier, somehow. However, I am becoming tired of development threads and deep inner workings of the SC2 interface. They just lead to an endless line of kids who never played BW claiming that the game should be more like BW, even though they would be terrible at BW.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11349 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-21 02:32:56
November 21 2012 02:31 GMT
#3
Ah right, I had not thought to include what smart-casting is. Thanks for the reminder.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
Sabu113
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States11047 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-21 03:02:42
November 21 2012 02:47 GMT
#4
I love your series of threads on these subjects. I mean this in the best way, but occasionally they read more as why BW was great rather than how SC2 needs to change.

Spells are generally less valuable and consequently less interesting because they are easily used and balanced because you feasibly spam 8 HTs. The research for storm finishing is less dramatic because storm isnt necessarily going to help you be aggressive or land some dramatic game changing/saving harass for 300 gas.

The problem is that you can't have Bio in the same game that a few skillfully deployed spells can be dropped. The increased radius would dramatically increase the usefulness of storm/templar in a game that already doesn't really see masses of high templar running about. Dodging storms is just too iffy an issue for units with half the health of BW hydras(*~).

In fact beyond the infestor I don't know if that's an issue. Forcefields just by design are a razors edge. Manual cast is not going to stop ramp shennanigans. It will reduce the usefulness of the spell in more open areas though even with a concievable buff in size.

So if you're going to play a bio-strong game I think you have to go with the smart-cast blanket the screen style storm. Otherwise a lot of these spells designed around easy use just don't make sense and the risk/reward ratio will go out of skew.

Also we talk about casual friendly games. Smart cast gateways definitely has made sc2 a lot more fun for me to take "seriously" than the few games I botched on iccup. Viewing spectacle aside, if we're caring about the fanbase, things like hotkeyable storm puts the 5 hour a week low apm guy playing at a semi-competitive level where the play apes pro-play enough to be interesting and not weird.

I think a side takeaway from this thread would be changing the game yet borrowing certain artifacts from BW. HT design seems out of line with sc2 in terms of cost and utility.

edit: sorry for the edit, didn't phrase my original sentiments well.
Biomine is a drunken chick who is on industrial strength amphetamines and would just grab your dick and jerk it as hard and violently as she could while screaming 'OMG FUCK ME', because she saw it in a Sasha Grey video ...-Wombat_Ni
M.R. McThundercrotch
Profile Joined June 2012
United States265 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-21 02:54:29
November 21 2012 02:49 GMT
#5
There is another way to address these problems without removing "smart" casting: greatly limit the availability of spells and spell casters by increasing energy costs and caster resource costs. Now, you would only get a few Storms; so, you had better make them count.

This shifts the difficulty from a raw mechanical skill to accuracy and decision making. I think this is probably a design preference, though it seems like StarCraft 2 is trying to move away from pure mechanical difficulty; so, this solution might be more likely.

Personally, I prefer accuracy over mechanics, but then my mechanics are terrible.
On June 30 2012 01:42 iNcontroL wrote: Fuck a lot of you. Fuck you forever.
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11349 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-21 03:20:34
November 21 2012 02:56 GMT
#6
You could address it by limiting the energy. That takes out a lot of spells from the game. But I think that flattens the skill difference top to bottom even more. Certainly there would be a greater importance on the individual cast. But it now becomes even easier for the top level players to get off all the storms. Therefore storms are even more of a hum-drum affair minus the accuracy part.

Part of the excitement of non-'smart'-casting is there is no such hard cap. There is a lot of potential spells, but it is impossible for a player to be fast enough to get them all off. Therefore the spells are balanced on the assumption that they won't all get off. But then, if a fast enough player comes along- the results are spectacular.

Higher energy cost deals with the clutter, but not necessarily with the fun/skill factor of trying to get more and more of these seemingly OP spells off.

The most extreme example of what I'm talking about is of course the mothership. There is only one of it and only 2? Vortexes at max energy. Therefore the accuracy of those Vortexes are paramount. We've limited the number of spells by energy cost (and unit numbers) But this doesn't quite lead to the excitement of the Jangbi storms.

How much difference would you really see between Hero's Vortex compared to a Bronze league Vortex? Probably its effectiveness is going to be more contingent on their opponent clumping up rather than a most excellent Vortex of pro-league levels.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
November 21 2012 02:59 GMT
#7
making the interface worse, making units dumber, is NEVER a good way to balance things; it just annoys people; whatever benefits it might allegedly yield; the drawbacks are far worse. find another way.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11349 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-21 03:05:42
November 21 2012 03:02 GMT
#8
On November 21 2012 11:59 zlefin wrote:
making the interface worse, making units dumber, is NEVER a good way to balance things; it just annoys people; whatever benefits it might allegedly yield; the drawbacks are far worse. find another way.

Did you read or watch anything in the OP?

Spell-casters are by design a more difficult unit, therefore 'worse interface, making units dumber.' Given that spell casters are designed to be difficult, to what extent should they difficult? What are the draw-backs in terms of game-play that you get when you don't have spell-casting? I've listed a great number of benefits.

Besides- smart-casting is slower than magic-box casting. The interface denies you the possibility of casting spells simultaneously.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
M.R. McThundercrotch
Profile Joined June 2012
United States265 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-21 03:19:47
November 21 2012 03:18 GMT
#9
On November 21 2012 11:56 Falling wrote:
Higher energy cost deals with the clutter, but not necessarily with the fun/skill factor of trying to get more and more of these seemingly OP spells off.


I think it is a matter of preference - the difference between hitting that smooth rhythm of fast casting or making that one money click that turns the tide.


How much difference would you really see between Hero's Vortex compared to a Bronze league Vortex? Probably it's effectiveness is going to be more contingent on their opponent clumping up rather than a most excellent Vortex of pro-league levels.


I did not realize how it would shift the skill burden from the caster to his opponent. It may not be feasible for a player to keep his units constantly space out, but there would definitely be a greater level of skill involved attempting it than in attempting to drop the one big spell. I don't think I like that at all. You're right.
On June 30 2012 01:42 iNcontroL wrote: Fuck a lot of you. Fuck you forever.
imre
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
France9263 Posts
November 21 2012 03:36 GMT
#10
Falling's series on sc2 general, dunno what to expect. I don't know if smartcasting is the main problem but for me the fact one race has to mass a spellcaster in mid/lategame because it's the most efficient way of playing is kinda dumb. And it concerns IT's too...
Zest fanboy.
Zanno
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
United States1484 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-21 03:37:48
November 21 2012 03:37 GMT
#11
why not just increase the mechanical difficulty of the spells by shortening their mana cost and durations proportionately

for example, imagine if force fields were only 15 energy but only lasted 5 blizzard seconds

trying to juggle targeting and positioning your army correctly while juggling carving up the enemy with force field walls suddenly requires a lot more dexterity to do

i think this argument is plain and simple wrong for one reason - the spellcasting UI in starcraft 1 was actually a huge oversight caused in starcraft's beta test - spells like psi storm originally behaved very similar to blizzard in warcraft 2 where it stacked endlessly and damaged buildings

so there was a originally an actual reason to throw 12 storms at one target, same with multiple dmatrixes providing an endless shield and multiple plagues resulting in an immediate drop to 1 hp

the change to spells no longer stacking was a last minute tweak right before the game's release and they never stopped to consider the implications it had on the controls
aaaaa
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11349 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-21 03:44:26
November 21 2012 03:40 GMT
#12
An unintended feature is no problem if the features turns out to be beneficial. (For instance Street Fighter 2's combo system and Quake's Strafe-jumping.)

And yes, this would also affect Infested Terran as well. It would be a pretty big shake-up for the balance. But I think it would be worth it for all the above reasons.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
GolemMadness
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Canada11044 Posts
November 21 2012 03:48 GMT
#13
Strafe jumping in Quake 2 was sweet. Stuff like that and patrol microing vultures were a hell of a lot more fun than spamming storm and fungal all over the place.
http://na.op.gg/summoner/userName=FLABREZU
Valikyr
Profile Joined June 2010
Sweden2653 Posts
November 21 2012 03:53 GMT
#14
I think this would be a really cool solution to the problem.
Patate
Profile Joined January 2011
Canada441 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-21 04:06:44
November 21 2012 04:04 GMT
#15
I'm all for this: higher APM players should be rewarded.. the skill ceiling has to go up . Campaign coudl be smart-casting for the people who don't want an annoying interface,but multiplayer should always try to be more friendly to the ones who are faster and better.

The "sport" would also be better to watch.. it is hard to be amazed by someone's micro right now (multitask, maybe.. but not micro). I feel bad for the casters having to hype those "amazing forcefields" and those "great fungal growths".. This is nothing impressing (and we can extrapolate to SC2 as a whole).
Dead game.
justjuice
Profile Joined January 2010
New Zealand165 Posts
November 21 2012 04:09 GMT
#16
AMAZING FUNGALS SO SKILLFUL.. no
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
November 21 2012 04:44 GMT
#17
Here's the problem with removing smartcasting: Everything else will still be smart. When you make Forcefields harder to use, and Storms, EMPs and Fungals harder to hit, you're essentially making deathballs and A-moving units better and better.

People need to remember every time they bring up BW: Everything was dumb. Everything. Units had bad pathing, buildings could only be individually selected, attacks would randomly miss, etc. So dumb spellcasters wasn't to balance OP spells, it just put spellcasters on par with everything else.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11349 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-21 05:00:02
November 21 2012 04:54 GMT
#18
@WolfintheSheep
I'm not sure I would say everything was dumber. In fact some stuff was demonstrably 'smarter'- moving shot and a variety of micro tricks.

I would say there was non-uniform army movement and I think that would certainly be worth looking into. (All those threads wanting to change how army movement works.) The current method of army movement is by no means the 'smartest.' I'm sure more spread out army movement could be accomplished without adding 'dumbness."

But this spell-casting thread comes on the heals of two other blogs:

A-Move By Design which indicates how to change unit behaviours to move away from Death Ball. Burst damage/ and cooldowns between attacking and moving. Basically, hold position micro, moving shot micro and the like. I was comparing how Hellion vs Vulture worked (slight delay on hellion.) And Reaver vs Collosus.

and

Levelling the Playing Field which talks about how to get better defenders advantage and therefore move away from Death Balls and more towards a positional game. Although, ultimately better defenders advantage runs hand in hand with easing off on how quickly money is accumulated and spent. (Economy and macro mechanics need to be fixed to move away from 12 min turtle to max.)

In that context, Spell-Casting is the next thing to look at. One of my videos hypothesizes that the reason for so many new abilities and spells is because of the lack of micro tricks like moving shot. It is perhaps a more minor point in my thread than it ought to be, but simply making spells harder to use is not enough I agree.

A greater focus on attack-retreat micro and a de-emphasis on unit-restricting spells would help move away from deathballs and A-moving.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
YyapSsap
Profile Joined September 2010
New Zealand1511 Posts
November 21 2012 05:46 GMT
#19
Such an excellent post. Its interesting to note that some spells in BW were actually smart castable from my memory but most damage dealing ones had to be manually done. I think the shift in emphasis to troop vs troop is what made the game more exciting where spells and abilities later in the game were kind of like the icying on the cake.

It might put casuals off, but if they get it off correctly the rewards would be huge thanks to the spells being more devastating due to this particular "handicap". I think its a win-win situation, and pros will have more legroom to show why they are pros. Many dont know why "STOOORRRMMMS" in BW is met with such an awe because to pull that off during the engagement is crazily impossible for mere mortals like us.

It would be the best solution to the spellcaster overload we have in SC2 especially when it involves infester/ghost/HT spam along with casters becoming the core composition in some armies.

Dustin needs to be informed of this.
MikeMM
Profile Joined November 2012
Russian Federation221 Posts
November 21 2012 05:59 GMT
#20
It’s really an interesting thread.
IMHO the game would have been better without smart casting.
1 2 3 4 5 12 13 14 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Epic.LAN
12:00
Epic.LAN 45 Playoffs Stage
Liquipedia
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Sea Duckling Open #136
CranKy Ducklings95
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 539
StarCraft: Brood War
Barracks 3752
actioN 2174
Larva 1315
Mini 998
Hyuk 926
Stork 539
firebathero 415
Soma 378
TY 282
Pusan 273
[ Show more ]
Last 237
Dewaltoss 149
JulyZerg 124
Hyun 124
ToSsGirL 75
Backho 73
Bonyth 53
GoRush 15
Icarus 14
SilentControl 6
Dota 2
Gorgc8851
singsing2877
XcaliburYe282
Fuzer 187
qojqva114
canceldota37
Super Smash Bros
Westballz32
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor186
Other Games
B2W.Neo1575
DeMusliM392
Lowko169
Trikslyr25
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2690
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH249
• sitaska45
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1133
Upcoming Events
CSO Contender
4h 50m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
21h 50m
Online Event
1d 3h
Esports World Cup
2 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
3 days
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
Championship of Russia 2025
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.